In recent years，The space criticism based on the process of urbanization of the capitalist society has become an important part of foreign Marxist research。In -depth research with research，Some problems still need to be clarified，Especially the relationship between urban Marxism and historical materialism。American sociologist Manuel Castells has accused Liefel Volly the theory of space production based on the criticism of daily life.，Criticizing its attempt from Marxist analysis from urban phenomena to Marxist urbanization theory，Criticism of people's survival status through daily criticism reintegrates into humanitarian context，is the theoretical orientation of historical materialism。But Edward W. Soja, another postmodern political geographic scientist and urban theorist in the United States, thinks，Because of this theory, the transformation from Marxism to Marxist spatialization from spatial analysis to Marxism is realized by this theory.，Only enabled Lieferfol to have such a profound impact on urban research and even the entire social science。Under the background of historical materialism and spatialization of materialism，Recognize the connection and difference between urban Marxism and historical materialism，Clarifying the space criticism in two contexts in concept analysis、Critical paradigm and differences in practical paths，It will continue to provide an important guidance for us to continue to promote the research of space for us。

　bet365 best casino games

Metropolitan Marxism bet365 best casino games originated from the space steering of social critical theory in the context of modern capitalist society，The gap between the reality determines that there must be differences in the space of Lefefol and Marx，Concentrated reflected in the understanding of the two people's understanding of the "city"。

First，The city identified by Lefel Voll is a modern city (URBain)，He divides history into agriculture、Three eras of industrial and urban cities，Ville (Ville) already exists in the agricultural and industry era，Urban is the unique product of the urban age，contains "constituent center、New content such as the space and building as a place of collection。Compared with，Marx's space knows the real foundation of European bet365 live casino games large industrial cities，Although it has already shown the tendency of anti -city eup to through the working revolutionary movement，But it is still misunderstood as a collection of class contradictions，Externalization representation of capitalist production relations，Therefore, it is more similar to the city in terms of nature and appearance。

2，The space identified by Liefer Volly is the space for commercialization，Generalization of goods、The commercialization of the land and the underground storage dependent on the space storage、Tamsui、Pure air and light elements have become "new rare objects"，and are regarded as the actual conditions of space commoditization。The space understood by Marx is the field of production and life，City is an inevitable result of capitalist development，But it is not the ultimate purpose of the production of capitalists。

third，Marx tends to be centralized for cities、intensive interpretation，See the concentration of production and capital as a prerequisite for bet365 live casino games large industrial cities，Gathering the space of the proof class as a prerequisite for joint operations。Liefelvol tends to make a fragmentation of space、Unpredictable interpretation，Not only does it clear the commodity and instrumentality of the space，Also connect space with power issues，The deconstruction of this space concept is at the same time as shaking time and social historical research.，It also opened a road for the logic connection of space and political economy and the logical connection of class analysis methods。

　　Differences of Space Critical Paradigm

Under the context of historical materialism，Adaptation to the development of space with the social development of the people，Material data production method is the fundamental basis for space construction，Changes in the form of ownership forms are closely related。For this，Marx has summarized in "Political Economics Criticism (1857-1858 Manuscript)": "Classical ancient history is the history of the city，But this is a city based on land ownership and agriculture; the history of Asia is a unified unity in the city and the countryside;，Then，Its further development is carried out in the opposition of cities and villages; modern [history] is rural urbanization，instead of in ancient times，Is the urban ruralization。”

Compared with，Urban Marxism is based on historical materialism "space missing fields" as preset，In the eyes of Western scholars，Historical materialism is no longer applicable to the new situation of capitalism，New cognitive pictures need to be constructed to stimulate Marxism to renew vitality。For this，Lefe Vol and Castor chose urban sociology roads，Harvey and Su Jia chose human geographic entry。Bet365 app download Lieferfol's space is pure form、Social Products、Tools Media and the Four Assumptions of Commodity Four Assumptions，Understand the city as a place for production relations，Try to build a critical paradigm provided by Marx provided by Marx provided by Marx in the "Capital" based on space political economics based on commercialized space。Castle introduces structuralism into urban research，Understand the city as the basic unit of contemporary capitalist laborers。Harvey thinks，The "time and space restoration" solution with the delay of capital circulation and the expansion of space expansion has become a new strategy for the capitalist country to alleviate the economic crisis，Therefore, it advocates geography、Environmental and natural resources such as space elements are included in historical materialism，The combination of the perspective and method of realizing Marxism through historical — geographical materialism constructs。Su Jia is committed to the postmodernization of Marxist geography，He does not agree with Harvey's practice of supplementing geographical elements into historical materialism，Instead, it is regarded as the category that is embedded in historical materialism but urgently needs to be unblocked。

In terms of methodology，Western scholars believe that dialectics is suspected of "time preference"，Try to expand it to it。Liefelh interprets space through the "three -one" way，Take space as space practice、Dialectical unity of space of space and representation of space，Break the dual opposition mode of space understanding and interpretation under the guidance of traditional dialectics。Harvey emphasizes the importance of geographical bet365 best casino games factors while adopting dialectics，Link the expansion of global unbalanced geographical development with capitalist production and capitalist non -righteousness。Su Jia tried to depict human life as society -time -space, Temporal, and spatial) 3D map scene，To construct a social -historical -triple dialectics method。He pointed out，Tripanic dialectics can prove the basic position of geographical factors in the field of justice research，The theory of justice in the past ignores the importance of geographical factors more or less，But "Geographical Unsally Easy Development，No matter what the reason is，Both the important reasons for the formation of individuals and social inequality, which leads to the non -righteousness of society and space "。

　Differences of space practice path

From Marx's eyes，The spatial problem of capitalism is the real expression of the internal defect of the capitalist production method，It fundamentally gets rid of the restraint of capital logic。The alienation state of the ending person in the space must be achieved through the change of the production method，and the proletariat is the main body of this process。So，The space understanding of historical materialism is a unity of critical and revolutionary。Compared with，Urban Marxism focuses on critical，The proletariat is no longer regarded as the subject of social history，Class Revolution is no longer understood as an effective way to discard space alienation。

Liefir Volt regards space as a condition for capitalist production relations，Space production and resettlement under the leadership of the resistance bourgeoisie is understood as the best way for proletarian resistance to capitalism。The space for critical capitalism，bet365 best casino games Harvey chose to resort to dialectical utopian ideal rather than communism。He pointed out，Utopia under the leadership of new liberalism is the retreat of utopia that loses critical function，In view of the questioning of communism，You need to choose a substitute solution -dialectical utopian to achieve resistance to the retreat。Dialectical Utopia not only requires "dialectics about space and time operation"，It also needs "rebellious architect" to play its main role。

Harvey borrowed Marx's metaphor of "the most stingy architect" in "Capital"，I believe that the labor process contains the performance of people's natural power，It also includes "A purposeful will as a purpose"，To explain the "free imagination" responsibility of the rebel architect，The "anti -rebuilding political practice" advocated by the rebels to resist the suppression of the freedom of the subject。At this time，Dialectical Utopia has replaced communism to become a solution for space problems，Rebellion architects replaced the proletariat into the subject of social history。

In short，Urban Marxism failed to give a practical space action strategy，It has not regarded the change of production methods as the only way for space liberation，Therefore, its criticism of capitalist space has never been deeply penetrated to the level of ownership。Although this choice is compatible with the cultural logic of contemporary capitalism，But it is also doomed to have differences in the space understanding in the context of historical materialism。At the same time，It is because of the two contexts in concept analysis、The above -mentioned differences in the criticism paradigm and practical path，Only to make Marxist space research present interactive fusion、mutual Bet365 lotto review observation、Open diversified theoretical landscape，Further show the fresh vitality of Marxism。

　　(Author Unit: Marxism College of China University of Political Science and Law)