The reform of the epidemic lag scientific research evaluation system reform
March 30, 2022 09:31 Source: "China Social Sciences" March 30, 2022 Total 2378 Author: Wang Junmei/Compilation

  bet365 live casino games March 28,The official website of the British "Thames Higher Education" journal is called,Under the influence of the new crown pneumonia,Scholars' interest in the reform of the scientific research evaluation system may be reduced。A recent global survey show by Ai Murui Publishing House in Britain,The academic community may lose interest in different types of academic indicators。

December 2012,Annual Meeting of the American Cell Biology Society,Editors and publishers of some academic journals put forward suggestions on the reform of the Reform Research Research Evaluation,On the basis of this, the "San Francisco Research Evaluation Declaration" (hereinafter referred to as "Declaration")。Declaration believes,Impact factor should not be the only tool and standard for evaluating the quality bet365 Play online games of scientific research。But,In this survey,70%of interviewees said that the basis for being evaluated is still journal papers and influence factor,But bet365 best casino games only 18%of the scholars in favor of abandoning influence factor。47%of interviewees said,They are willing to introduce indicators other than influencing factors as standards for measuring the quality of scientific research。But,For whether you can find a suitable alternative indicator,49%of interviewees expressed concerns。

Compared with the survey of previous years,The results of this survey show,Scholars' enthusiasm for leading changes has also been reduced。34%of interviewees said,They are open -minded to change,and this proportion in 2019 is 38%。Sally Wilson, the publishing director of Airui Deer Publishing Bet365 app download House, said,Current,The academic community is still keen to reform the scientific research evaluation system,But the epidemic has led to a certain "change fatigue",This explains why scholars lack enthusiasm for new scientific research evaluation indicators。

​​For a long time,An important indicator of the quality of research personnel research personnel,Journal influencing factor will affect their career,But the impact factor is not necessarily the best incentive method to promote scientific research and progress。Wilson thinks,The academic community should also explore a variety of types bet365 Play online games of scientific research evaluation standards,To more accurately reflect the influence of scientific researchers' work。

  (Wang Junmei/Compilation)

Editor in charge: Chen Jing
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be bet365 Play online games reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12 floor of Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026