In "Action、Reasons and Reasons "(1963) article，Davidson proposed and defended an analog interpretation theory that has an important impact on the philosophy of contemporary action。According to this theory，Action explanation is a cause and effect explanation，When we want to explain why a person does what he does，The reasons we have resorted to him。Davidson thinks，The reason for an action is that the desire that actors have when implementing this operation — belief right，This psychological pair is both the cause of action，It is also the main reason for rationalization of action，In Davidson's words, "the main reason for one action is its reason"。

Davidson Action Interpretation Theory The basics of the theory is his event theory。According to this ontology theory，Incident is the change of things in specific space -time，It is a unique item in the universe。Event can be divided into physical events and psychological events。If an event can be described in pure physical vocabulary，It is a physical event，If an event can be described in a psychological vocabulary，It is a psychological event。Action is a kind of event，The characteristic of distinguishing action from non -action events is the intention of action。Davidson thinks，Action is human physical exercise，But not all physical movements are action，Some physical exercise just happened to us that happened to us。Only when one person is the ability of his physical movement，Only when his physical movement can be described as "interested"，Physical exercise is his action。

bet365 best casino games Davidson thinks，intention is the feature that distinguish between action different from non -action events，but not the reason for action，Because of one incident, it can only be another advance event，Intention is not an event。The reason for the action is the beliefs and desires owned by the actor。Although the faith and desire itself are not events，but the state and tendency，But what they appeared in the ability of the movement is the event。The emergence of desire and faith is psychological event，Action is physical movement as a physical event，This means，Psychological events can be the cause of physical events。In "Psychological Incident" (1970),，Davidson proposed three principles about the relationship between psychological and physical incidents。First，Cause and effect principle: At least some psychological events are related to the cause and effect of physical events。2，The principle of the rules of causal relationship: Anyone who exists and effects must exist，Therefore, events related to causality are affiliated with strict decision theory。third，Psychological irregularity principles: There is no psychological event that can be based on the rigorous decision theory of prediction and explanation。

The above three principles have obvious inconsistencies。According to the previous two principles，At least certain psychological events can be predicted and explained based on the law，But the third principle denies this。Davidson proposes to solve this problem。According to this theory，Each psychological event is equivalent to a physical event。It is said that there is no psychological event that can be determined by strict decision theory of explained and predicted，It is equivalent to saying that there is bet365 live casino games no rigorous decision law covering psychological incidents，There is no psychological psychology that does not have strict decisive theories。So，What is the laws of strict determination of psychological event A and physical incident B of the cause and effect relationship? Davidson pointed out，That is strict physical laws，That is, the cause and effect law associated with the same physical event C and other physical events such as psychological event A。Davidson thinks，Through irregular one yuan theory，We can maintain the inevitability of the physical world and the cause and effect of the physical world and the psychological world，Freedom of maintaining the psychological world。From Davidson's view，This is essentially Kant's route。

I think，Davidson's irregularity theory is substantially different from the Kant route。

First，irregular one yuan theory is essentially a physicalism，Although it is not physics in the sense of restoration theory，Because it regards the entire universe, including human psychology as a physical event composed of strict physical laws。Davidson admits，As far as all events are advocating for physical incidents，irregular one -dollar theory is similar to materialism，The difference is that it rejects such an argument for materialism，That is, psychological phenomena can be given physical explanation。From the author's view，Compared with the psychological phenomenon with physical interpretation，equivalent to all individual psychological events with individual physical events can be said to be a stronger physicalism，and physics does not belong to Kant's route。

Next，No regular one -dollar theory does not leave room for freedom for morality。Freedom in Kant is a dual meaning。The freedom of Bet365 app download negative meaning is willful (Willkür，Selection ability) Independence of natural laws，Freedom in affirmative sense is the self -discipline of will，Is the cause of the law of morality。No regular one -dollar theory is just the negation freedom in the Contest sense，This kind of freedom is equivalent to "irregular"。"Promote human actions to psychological events，Use irregular instead of freedom，This is the description of my question。Of course，The connection is more closely，Because Kant believes that freedom contains irregularities。”

Davidson's Action Theory Follow the Action itself rather than the relationship between action and ethics。In his opinion，Since the relationship between action and ethics is too concerned，Research on the action itself has been interrupted after Aristotle。From the author's view，Due to the splitting theory and ethics of action，As a result of Davidson's action theory, only the facts in the field of action，Ignoring the rights of the rights。

Kant introduces the distinction between facts and rights issues while introducing epistemology，also transformed the empiricist (such as Locke) in modern epistemology, physiologische into priority philosophy。From the perspective of Kant，Experienceists can only solve (interpretation) of factual problems in the experience of empirical psychology，That is the subjective possession of the concept，It cannot solve the objective effectiveness of the concept，That is, the right to use the concept (legitimacy) of the subject in objective understanding cannot be solved，The latter can only be solved by rational critical。The fundamental difference between the experiencer and Kant's bet365 Play online games epistemology is，The former will only be regarded as the natural relationship between the Lord，and the latter believes。According to Kant's point of view，The objective effectiveness of recognition is the inevitable general validity，and generally validity is the effectiveness of all the subjects，Is the effectiveness between the subject。The Lord -Lord Relationship is not the relationship between the facts，but a right relationship; not a natural relationship，but rational relationship。Knowing not only contains nature (cause and effect) relationship，and contains rational (rights) relationship，This is an experiencer that the subject never recognized。

Davidson saw the similarity of epistemology and action theory，Because he saw the similarity of knowledge and action，、The relationship between the relationship between thought and the world。Physical world stimulates our senses，The result is a complex concept image about the physical world，By asking the image for help，How do we reason how to achieve our purpose through action。In perception，Thoughts caused by the physical world，In action，Thoughts cause changes in our physical environment。"Of course，It is said that Davidson does not consider the relationship between the subject at all.。According to his "triangular relationship" theory，Only in (at least) the triangle relationship between the two subjects and one object，It is possible to provide content for the discourse and ideas of the subject。but，He interpreted the main -guest relationship with the main relationship with the main -main relationship as the relationship between nature (stimulation -reaction) relationship，instead of the relationship between rights。

bet365 best casino games The main reason for "one action is the reason for its reason" contains a series of parallel confusion: the confusion of reasons and reasons; confusion of natural space and rational space; confusion of explanation and defense; facts and right issues and rights issues Confusion。The desire and belief of the active person can indeed be used as a subjective reason for the interpretation action，But they do not just rationalize the reason for action。Righteousness of action is to put it into a rational logic space，In the right relationship with other actors，instead of just placed in a natural space，In the causal relationship of the subjective psychological state of the entry and the active psychological state of the actor。Only rational and objective reasons can become a reason。The subjective desires of the actor should become a reasonable reason for the rationalization of action，It cannot be a natural (psychological) cause that is just subjective and effective，and must be a rational reason with objective effectiveness。or，It must meet such rights conditions，Under this condition，It can coexist with the desire of others in accordance with the general law of freedom。Similarly，The belief of the actor can be rationalized，It can not only act as a realization tool for subjective desires，and must have a critical review of the rationality of desire itself。In other words，Faith cannot just reflect the rationality of the tool，but must be based on practical rationality，The content of the faith cannot just be that the action is the subjective wishes of the actor，and must be actions at the same time that are objective and legitimate。

　bet365 Play online games

(Author Unit: Department of Philosophy of Suzhou University)