Among the thoughts in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties，Fu Shan's personality is extremely clear，He especially advocates that scholars must dominate，For history、There must be a unique look at the world。In the article "Seeing the Ancients"，Fu Shan said very heroically: "A pair of ethereal eyes，No one is not allowed to hide today，Not allowed the ancients to hide。Look at the ancients' active ...，Unbearable，But my heart is not subject to private disadvantages，Guangming Dongda，Optional at any time，Touch it，I don’t want to discuss it。”

On the issue of Scripture Relationship Theory，Fu Shan holds a kind of radical thought of "Zi Yu Shou Jing", "Scripture Source" and "Equality Scripture"。In the article "Scripture's Controversy"，He said: "The dispute between the sutra is also the last。Because the Confucian knows the name of the Six Classics，Then I think that the son is not as good as the monarch，Seeing contempt for seeing。Seek it with the word，The word "巠"。‘one’ is the sky，‘巛’ Congchuan。"Said": ‘巠，Water pulse also。‘Gong’ 焉，Divided ‘Two’ as heaven and earth，‘∣’ peeing。‘Zi’ is ‘one’ ‘‘ ‘。Ancient ‘Zi’ Word。巠、What are the people from '巛'?巛 巛 者，Water also。巛 The principle Bet365 lotto review of popular underground。"" The above -mentioned unique meaning training method，Fu Shan made a philosophical interpretation of the original meaning of the scriptures and the son，Based on this, further inference: "Confucius、Mencius does not call the Kong Jing、Meng Jing，and must be called Confucius、Mencius，It can be seen that there is a child and then the scripture "，The main angle from the scripture，I ingeniously demonstrates the principle of "Zi Yu Shou Jing"。

From the perspective of history，Fu Shan restores the scriptures and scriptures as the "king of generations"，and then cleverly denied the universal significance of scriptures and classics。He said: "The" Five Classics "'Four Books' Note，One generation king system，Non -Anwan Tongzhi also。Note sparse flood，It is not in the Houfu Institute of Confucianism，Don't know。"" That is to say，"Five Classics" and "Four Books" and comments on these works，All are reflected in the political system of the dynasty，Therefore, it is a historic text，It does not have the universality of spanning time。This is the saying of the "Five Classics History" and "Four Books' Note History" in disguise，Comments "Five Classics" and "Four Books" (belonging to the "Thirteen Classics" scriptures) and other scriptures to be restored to historic texts，Later Zhang Xuecheng、The "Six Classics History" advocated by Gong Zizhen，It is quite consistent in spiritual essence。

If you say，Wang Fuzhi of the Similarity for the sons，Especially the Buddha's heresy studies Bet365 lotto review adopted "Entry Base，Strike its，Critical inheritance inheritance in inheritance in violation of its flaws，Fu Shan on the issue of Scripture Relationship，It is precisely with the help of the sons，Especially Lao Zhuangzhi Criticized Cheng Zhu Lixue。Therefore，His and Wang Fuzhi just constitute the opposite pole on the issue of the relationship between the Scripture。In Fu Shan's manuscript，He exposed himself: "" Old "and" Zhuang "two books，It is where my life is。Wing Rotary Simpage Cantae，Be careful。If you wake up a half sentence，It is useful，Can be entered for the way。"He not only loves the book" Lao Tzu "，Taste the cloud "Don't Read" Lao Tzu "，Tongue tongue is soft。Different Dan Dan Qi Qi。Fifty after fifty，Fine Note "Lao Tzu"，and the predecessors are good at this scholar，How much tongue is expensive，The tongue is finally a soft bottom "，and highly evaluate the book "Zhuangzi"，"Zhuangzi is a book，Although it is resumed，outside the Liujing outside，For example, the sun and the moon，Inherent frequent transport。and the wind and clouds open，Ghosts change，If you must not be。Ancient and modern scribes every strange，Consult the literal，Since the weekend language，Non -reciprocating future generations can be known "。

Fu Shan uses the pre -Qin Zhuzi to learn，Special Laozhuang Studies criticized the typical form of science in the Song and Ming science，The word "ration" of science is focusing on，Think of bet365 Play online games the word "ration" what Song Ru said，It is rare among the pre -Qin sons，The meaning of the meaning of "reason" they also said is very different，and do not fit the Confucian scriptures and Confucianism thoughts in the pre -Qin period。For example，Fu Shan said: "Song Ru is entangled with 'reason' words。‘Lifa’ characters are righteous，Good words，The mouth of the Confucianist，I only feel that its voice is ridiculous。"when studying" Lao Tzu "and" Zhuangzi "text，He often said that there is no "reason" word，There is no word "sex"; although there is "reason" in the individual text of "Zhuangzi"，Never look at the word "reason" of Song Ru，"Zhuangzi，Learning Elderly also，and use the word to be dominated without being very interested "。When studying "Lao Tzu"，Fu Shan said: "" Lao Tzu "Chapter 81 Never‘ Law ’，Heye? Miao 哉!，So "Dao Jing"。The Tao is also a strong name，It is reasonable! "Through the inspection of the word" Li "in the text of" Zhuangzi "，Fu Shan comes to a very ironic conclusion: The "reason" that Song Ru said is exactly what Zhuangzi said- "Lao Tzu" Chapter 81 is unreasonable，"Zhuangzi" is reasonable。​​The principle of "Zhuangzi"，Beginning with the cow of Ding Ding，Said: ‘Yishali，Pie (should be ‘criticism’ character，Quoter Note) Big，Director 窾，Scripture is not tasted，。，Mu Miao to "Zhuangzi"。The Phase of the World Confucianism，The so -called Bet365 lotto review 觚，Cut the knife，，Gao Liang Liang，Xia Zujun 庖。"Fu Shan regards the" rationality "of Song Rucheng Zhu Yi's" reason "as a big bone that makes the blade fold，Actually it means，Cheng Zhu's "reason"，Theoretically it is a "unreasonable" big pimple，Full of irrational ingredients。Very interesting thing is，Thirty -three texts for "Zhuangzi" text，Each Fu Shan has counted the number of words，It can be seen that he carefully studied the book "Zhuangzi"。

The text quoted above can be seen，Fu Shan's criticism of typical science of classics，The academic method it uses，is the meaning of the word meaning that he is good at (concept history、History of Concept) Examination。Due to his excitement point is to criticize science，Therefore, deliberately find the word "ration" everywhere to do articles。We know，"Zhuangzi" "Inner Seven Articles" actually does not have the word "conscience"，Not only "inner seven" without，"Zhuangzi" thirty -three articles、"Lao Tzu" has no "conscience" in the eighty -one chapters。Why did Fu Shan not specifically proposed? the reason is，Reverse Zhu Li's academic position，First specifies the academic vision of Fu Shanyan to read Laozhuang's thoughts。Such a vaguely counter -rational thought，Become a "Pre -understanding" for becoming Fu Shan's study of Laozhuang Thought，Not only shows the uniqueness of the research research of Fu Shanzhuang，But it is also a large extent to a large limit. Fu Shan Bet365 lotto review research Lao Tzu、Zhuangzi's ideological vision。More，Fu Shan criticizes "Li" learning with historical restoreism methods，It has a certain meaning，But it cannot really refute the inferiority。The ancients have not said，Can you talk about future generations? therefore，Word meaning、Historical restoration method of concept，When the theoretical error of opposition science，Although it is an available method，But it is not necessarily a powerful and effective method。

Learn by Fu Shanzi，Especially his research on the attitude of studying Laozhuang's thoughts，We found，Fu Shan actually only uses the thoughts of the sons to criticize the rigidity and narrowness of science and learning，Strong ideological innovation consciousness，But as far as the sons themselves are concerned，Not the real study research。Because in the eyes of Fu Shan，The articles and thoughts of Zhuzi are just a critical tool，It has not been studied as a whole as a thought。In the development process of the theory of Scripture，Whether it is a child syndrome、Yizi Make Sutra，Still refute the sutra，These attitudes towards the scholars' learning，Although there are differences in academic direction and purpose，However, the scholars of Zhuzi as a tool，is the same。Taking the scholars as an independent academic research object，It is an academic phenomenon that appears with the complete decline of classics after the late Qing Dynasty。

　　bet365 Play online games

(The author is the School of Philosophy of Wuhan University、Professor of National College、Dean of the Institute of Civilization Dialogue of Wuhan University)