bet365 live casino games

　　Summary of content:This article explores the strengths and limitations of individualization theory，Contributions to the long -term debate of "religious secularization or religious individualization" for a long time。First，This article presents three new versions (Gabhart et al.、Knoblauhehe and Baker's individualization theory。Next，Their common point of view，is the practice that religious privatization is removed from the discussion，It was placed in "Religious Observation" in 2008 and 2013 empirical research discovery inspection。The main point of this article is，Religious transformation is not only about individual，At the same time, it is also related to collective and social problems。The conclusion is，For a very wide impact、I believe that individualization has changed the church、Social and human claims，Need to be carefully criticized。Some high degree of diversification and individualization，Empirical tests in Catholic Church and Protestant Church。The existence of Western Europe has a higher degree of religiousness than the previous assumptions，This article also provides evidence。but，Devilization is not proof，The privatization of religion has not been ruled out。Whether it is secularization or individualization theory，Too much emphasis on homogeneity，Unable to cover a high heterolysis。Small choice and religion's choice，Church's religion and individualized religion，In the same church、The same country and the same individual coexist。〔曲〕〕       

Annette Wilke，Director of the Department of Religious Research at the University of Minister, Germany。Her research interest, in addition to religious research theory and method、Cultural Interpretation，It also includes South Asian religion (especially Hinduism)、Streaming Population Study、Religion and sensation，and modern religious transfer。Recently published the discussion: "The secularization or personalization of religion?" Theoretical and empirical discovery "，"ZFR, 2013, 21(1), pp.29-76)。 email:wilkeann@uni-muenster.de