bet365 live casino games

Innovation and governance is a pair of disorderly and orderly dialectical concepts。The construction of innovative culture is not happened overnight，Not forever for all，It is necessary to constantly break the boundary to stimulate the power mechanism of innovative ecology，Therefore, new and ambitious ambitions have emerged、Culture of adaptability and creativity。

　Science and culture should be combined with governance situations

Science culture is the foundation and core of innovation culture，The appearance of the latter to some extent is the saving and governance of scientific culture in crisis，But the cultivation of governance culture has not attracted attention。Science culture is an autonomous culture，Whether it is based on truth -based episodes，It is still the utilitarian goal of benefiting the society，All are the maintenance of this tradition。but but，Since the 20th century，Due to the exponential growth of the science itself and the extent to a certain degree of moral responsibility exemption，Make it fall into the dilemma of retreat and the public question，Start with the practical needs of external society，Continuously expand its own level，Seeking new development motivation，This has an innovative cultural problem that appeared in the middle of the 20th century。The founder of the concept of "post -conventional science" Jerome Ravetz believes，Although science can adapt to the profound change of social structure，The transformation from science to large science or comprehensive science occurred，But this transformation endangers the informal quality control arrangement of basic science，This Bet365 lotto review leads to degeneration and decay of practice。Reasons for the reason，After the science is embedded in social order，In the process of constantly breaking the border，In the seamless network woven by government, industry, research，Instead, the loss of the border between the community and the absence of the responsible subject，Return to the disorderly development stage。Ordering is the structural feature of innovation，But drive innovation in the "disorderly" social system，It will only cause the opposite effect。

Combination of science and governance situations，The further construction of the innovative culture indicates a new direction。Dested，Scientific standardization issues are already a "governance" problem。"Governance" is a different or even conflict of mutual conflict.，Based on this, take the continuous process of joint operations。Scientific objective claims to turn to the "enlarged interest community"，The issue of rationality of science has become a public issue，or even a political game，This is also the current international community's climate protocol、Transconduction、Different reasons for nuclear energy and civilian use。So，Governance will provide adaptability for the "quality standard" that replace the "truth" standard、Democratic guidance framework，Solving scientific and technological disputes。Another，The revival of basic research is the most prominent feature of global scientific development in recent years，This is also an important opportunity to propose innovative cultural issues in the new era。

　Exploring the innovative culture of Chinese characteristics in the new era

Western innovation, represented by Joseph Alois Schumpeter，Its innovative logic follows a basic science、Linear driver mode between the paradigm between technical application and economic transformation，Can't talk about a positive impact Bet365 lotto review on the reform of the global economy and institutional mechanism。The innovation -driven strategy promoted by the Chinese government，In essence, it is an innovative mechanism as a power engine for economic growth，and embedded in the global sustainable development trajectory，and scientific autonomy being reorganized is the key to drive this mechanism，This is already different from the innovative paradigm of traditional West。

Social governance of the issue of people's livelihood as the duration，Diagnosis of technological development and application of technology development and application，Cultivate innovative genes that adapt to local natives by guiding the autonomy of science，This is the logical starting point and value orientation of building a new era of innovative culture with Chinese characteristics。Compared to Western countries，Chinese traditional culture pays attention to the use of the world、Minwei Bangben，The cause of closely related interests with the public can better stimulate the enthusiasm of the community's overall thinking。In the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the issue of people's livelihood was promoted to the national governance level，This is also the direction of the main contradictions in the new era。Around the cause of people's livelihood，Employment、Education、Medical、Environment、Poverty alleviation、The governance of practical problems such as security constitutes a framework for technological innovation in my country，It is also conducive to mobilizing the enthusiasm of enterprises to engage in basic research and the extensive participation of the public。Therefore，This innovative path of "people's livelihood problem → technical development → scientific autonomy" subverts the "scientific autonomy → technical development → profit growth point" bet365 live casino games framework of Xiong Bishi。Of course，The collaboration between democratic innovation and diverse subjects requires new cultural forms to guide。

　Constructing a new cultural form

Current，"Innovation -Governance" collaborative symbiosis、Institutional arrangements for effective operation are not perfect，Before starting this new type of cultural form, the construction of this new cultural form，We think there are three key points in the following。

First，"Innovation -Governance" cultural form should be committed to forming a clear community of psychological responsibility allocation framework。This is reflected in specific laws and regulations，It also involves the constraints of moral ethics。The generation of any one cultural form and the main body of the construct。Culture is relative to the community，Value that depends on the establishment of the community、A collection of specifications and practical methods，However, the boundary arrangement of the community also has the division of "static" and "dynamic"。Science and culture as an autonomous culture，It is relative to the scientist community，There is a high entry threshold，This is the static community boundary。Innovative culture corresponds to the dynamic innovation community。Innovative community is not only available now，In the 19th century, it was performed as a coordinated model of technology and industry based on interests。After World War II，This form is more common，The structure and method of synergy are also more complicated，​​There is a government -led，There are also industry or research institutions led。The formation of an innovative community in history is flexible、Variable access mechanisms，This is of course conducive to optimization of resource allocation and practical efficiency，But once the subject is withdrawn or the project ends，The community bet365 Play online games here will not exist，Then the power and responsibility of the innovative subject cannot be traced back。Therefore，Dynamic community border still needs to maintain an orderly multi -dimensional framework，To bear the adverse consequences of innovation，Otherwise, it is difficult to be truly cultivated in any new type of culture。

Second，In the new "innovation -governance" cultural form，Innovation and governance is a two -way mechanism that drives future social structural transformation。Governance itself is an innovation of the "Control and Command" paradigm，This mechanism exists in the adaptation process with the actual situation，Therefore, the democratization emphasized with the Innovation、Multi -level、Local characteristics and other characteristics are common，This has a "bold innovation，After -the -time governance "of the feasibility of time and space fracture。In real cases，A new round of scientific and technological revolution is prompted to transform global cities to "smart cities"，There is a general cognitive deviation here，It is believed that artificial intelligence is an effective means of urban governance，As everyone knows, any technical innovation itself and its intervention in the new ecology need to be matched with a governance framework，This has become the biggest obstacle to the failure of most cities。Urban governance is extremely complicated，Multi -dimensional ecological systems of various institutions and stakeholders are often disturbed by conflict of interests。Therefore，The wisdom of the city requires an appropriate governance system to connect all the prototype subject (structure and organization、Character and responsibility、Technology and data、Legislative and Policy)，Allow knowledge transfer promotion decision -making，In order to maximize social, economic and environmental bet365 live casino games performance。In this process，The innovation mechanism is also happening，All prototype subjects have the possibility of being reshaped。

third，The construction of the cultural form of "Innovation -Governance" can be embedded in the social experimental ecosystem in the "small habitat" form，Preditable test。Small habitats are more basic than other ecological positions，is the collection of "Aboriginal people" and their activities;，As a model that discusses the law of evolution，Its theoretical principles abandon abstraction，Emphasize the specific rules of use (KNow-How)，The significance of the specification is not to be proven to be generally effective，Instead of whether it can be implemented in the action on specific occasions。Therefore，This silent practice can be used as an effective measure to prevent uncertainty。The innovative culture we cultivates now includes technology、System、Policy、Management、A systematic innovation mechanism including values, etc.，In essence, it is condensing new standard space，and technological innovation has played a series of functions from point to face。but but，The scientific cause of the post -conventional era needs to "intervene" directly，Uncertainty encountered、irreversible、Unpredictable allegations have been confirmed as the fundamental characteristics of science itself，So technological innovation based on this is not only blind，It also brings a greater burden to social governance。The dissolution of governance and innovation in the space -time limit is particularly urgent。So，We need to directly introduce technical innovation experiments into the "field" test area for，Evaluation and governance mode of technical application、Related laws and regulations、Simultaneous development of the generation of technical and moral scenes，Forms Bet365 lotto review a "innovation -governance" test situation in the form of "small life"。

　(This article is a special project of the National Social Science Fund "Research on the Research on Innovation Culture with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era" (18VSJ089) phased results)

(Author Unit: Department of Philosophy of Zhejiang University)