In recent years，Smart City Construction has been in China、United States、UK、India、Brazil and many other countries to put on a schedule，Injects new vitality into global urban construction and economic development。Smart City depends on big data、5g、IoT、Intelligent technology represented by artificial intelligence，Reflecting the distinctive features of technical governance，But there are also technical inequality、Many problems such as excessive power of experts and the flood of tool rationality。Only comprehensive analysis of technical governance issues in the construction of smart cities，Adhere to "people -centered"，can continuously promote the construction and governance practice of smart cities，Explore the development direction of smart cities in the new era。

　　Bet365 lotto review

Technocracy (Technocracy) sometimes also uses "technical rule" and "expert governance theory"，There are two dimensions: one is to use scientific and technological achievements to govern the society，The second is to emphasize the main position of the experts of experts who have undergone natural science and social science training。The construction and governance of smart cities meet the above two dimensions，Therefore, it shows that smart cities depend on technical governance。

First，The construction of smart cities require big data、5g、IoT、Comprehensive use of governance technologies such as artificial intelligence。In the future map of the smart city，The city will be embedded from its road、Grid、Computers in the building、Sensor、Collecting and analyzing data in the camera，Intelligent、Dynamic、real -time way Bet365 lotto review to perceive the city，Forecast the future of the city。Some scholars think，In the future, a "Caibo Space" corresponding to the real space should be established，Data from the two spaces can be maximized in real time、Interactive calculation、Instant feedback。Under the ideal situation，Big data algorithms in Paibo Space can identify the characteristics and laws of urban operations in the real space，Make real time、Autonomous judgment，Then reflect this judgment directly in the physical process of the real space。Visible，Extract "Full Data" from "Full Source" and "Full Process"，Plan the future of the reliable laws and correlation patterns obtained by the big data algorithm，is the ultimate goal pursued by the governance of smart cities。

Next，During the rise and promotion of smart cities，A community of knowledge that is committed to solving the problem of smart cities has also risen。This knowledge community includes three types of groups: one is technology experts，More and more urban planning、Experts and scholars in the fields of civil engineering and urban management invest in planning for smart cities、Construction、Management research and practice。The second is IBM、Cisco、Huawei、Encyclopedia and other high -tech companies are related to interests related groups，They spare no effort to promote the future map of the smart city，and provide technical solutions for。Its three，Smart cities have spawned new government agencies and institutional arrangements，Government officials in these institutions are also an important part of the community，For example, my country's "Smart City Working Committee"、"Urban Operation Center" in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil。This is a technology expert、Enterprise、The knowledge community composed of officials has recognized professional knowledge and ability，Can help decision Bet365 lotto review makers recognize and determine the problems they are facing，and evaluate possible policy solutions。They share a set of knowledge、Faith、Practice，Follow -up policies for smart cities、Drawing future vision，The key personnel network that advocates and maintains the technical governance of smart cities。

　　Technical governance issues of smart cities

We should also pay attention，Smart City has an extent extensive phenomenon of technical inequality、It is difficult to regulate the power of capital and experts、Superstition technology tools and many problems such as rationality，has been criticized by more and more scholars。

First，The technical governance orientation of smart cities may cause technological inequality phenomena。The first is the urban space inequality。Due to the construction of smart cities, relying on high -tech companies，The construction method will cause the construction and coverage of the technical governance platform and the data perception system to present time and spatiality，is gradually covered from the high commercial value city center to the suburban suburbs with low commercial value。This may lead to the blessing of technical convenience，Formed "Matthew Effect"，Causes rejection and gap in the lags of the city。The second is inequality between the residents of the city。Smart cities take the great popularity of intelligent technology as the prerequisite，If anyone is due to the economy、Body or psychological reasons cannot use smart devices，is often regarded as a "marginal case" in a "normal operation" system，Its needs cannot be met，It is not possible to integrate into the technical future of smart cities。The third is algorithm unequal。Design of the rule of machine learning algorithm is often mixed with the designer's subjective prejudice，Selection of the source of data is also difficult to guarantee bet365 best casino games fairness。When the big data algorithm is touted as a way to understand and control society，without paying sufficient attention to the history (or thinking mode) of analyzing data，It will undoubtedly repeat inequality、Unfair algorithm decision。

Next，The technical governance orientation of smart cities has spawned the expert's power regulation and the abuse of capital。Information and communication technology industry is both the advocate and beneficiary of the concept of smart cities，It is also the main provider of the technical solution of smart city，Therefore, the boundaries of the knowledge community of smart cities and the boundary of vested interests are very vague。The current design plan for smart cities has been criticized by many scholars as the replacement of social contracts for business contracts。In the face of increasingly complex technical problems in smart cities，The knowledge community of smart cities often advocates more use、More advanced technology to solve，Provide reliable for public interests、Low cost、Frequent services，And this also means more economic benefits，Even marketization driven by private interests、Touching of Private Logic。Although there are a few smart cities blueprints acknowledge the necessity of citizens' participation，But it is often based on parent -style preaching。For example，When the public is concerned about the privacy issues brought by the big data algorithm，Urban managers simply believe that this is a "excessive supervision" of technology or "distorted cognition" for technical risks。

Last，The technical governance orientation of smart cities reflects the superstition of the rational of technical tools。The core of this superstition is a deep -rooted "solutionism"，That is, I believe that all problems in the world can be solved through technical means。If all urban governance issues，Including those that are essentially caused by bet365 Play online games social factors，All defined as problems that are needed to solve，Then the space of philosophical reflection and political dialogue will disappear。Technical tools rationally follow the logic of technical operation，Taking maximum efficiency as the goal，Ignoring the humanistic care in social governance and the public’s sense of gain、​​Value targets such as happiness。

　　The technical treatment of the smart city

Construction of smart cities as technical governance practice，To some extent "technical -centric"，There are problems that ignore "people -centered"。In the process of promoting the smart city in our country，should also insist on "co -construction、Co -governance、Sharing "is the implementation path of a smart city，Establish the principles of "people -centered" smart city construction principles。Specifically，You can deal with technical governance issues in smart cities from the following perspective。

One，Technical inequality phenomenon of eliminating smart cities，Realize scientific and technological achievements everyone sharing。Should strengthen government subject intervention，Focus on solving different spaces in the city、"Digital Glutology" problem existing among groups。The government should continue to expand the application and coverage of high -tech applications，Preventing the phenomenon of spatial discrimination or marginalization of smart cities in terms of technological popularization。At the same time，It is also necessary to promote the popularity of high -tech、British，Improve the ability of different groups to use new technologies，or consider the production and living needs of "technical disability groups" with other non -technical solutions。other，Algorithm designers must also realize the prejudice and unfairness that may exist in the laws of the algorithm and the training data，bet365 best casino games Prevent "hidden discrimination" of disadvantaged groups。

Its two，Improve the supervision and regulation of capital and power，Emphasize multi -party collaborative governance of smart cities。The legal and institutional system of experts and enterprises to participate in urban technology governance should be improved，Avoid the "food and profit class" during the construction and governance of smart cities，Even the conspiracy of capital and power。It should also focus on creating an open technical governance community。In a smart city，Various government agencies、Emerging technology interdependence、The relationship is increasingly complicated，Its complexity、Uncertainty、Systemic、Dynamic makes it difficult for smart cities to achieve a centralized plan from top to bottom。So，In the technical governance practice of smart cities，The government should be promoted、Expert、Public、Open participation of multiple subjects such as the market，Avoid the power of functional departments or high -tech enterprises excessive power，Provides multiple perspectives for solving the problem of smart cities。

Its three，Focus on the unity of the rational and value rationality of tools，Whether the people's longing for a better life as a "gold standard" for a smart city。Technology Tool rationally restores complex social problems into solved technical problems，Whether the technical logic and technical efficiency are the sole evaluation criteria for whether the political decision -making in smart cities，Focus on the unity of the rational and value rationality of tools、Life feelings and feelings。It should be used as the starting point and end point of the technology，Return the city's functions to the living of people、Production、Life，To achieve technical elements、Humanities、Social Elements、Organic combination of economic elements，Can Bet365 lotto review you get rid of the alienation of intelligent technology to citizens，Realizing what Marx said, "People’s freedom and comprehensive development"。

　　(This article is the "Research on Modern Technical Governance Theoretical Issues" (21&ZD064) Staged results)

(Author Unit: School of Philosophy of Renmin University of China)