bet365 cricket odds is the first part of the Mysterious Case in the Cave，From bet365 cricket odds part，It is not the trapped person who makes the decision，But under the command of experts，Here，There is no other possibility，Experts have pronounced the situation of the trapped people: bet365 cricket odds is a fatal situation。In a modern society dominated by expert knowledge，There are many similar situations，For example, announcing that a patient will not survive ten days，Or announce that it will be based on existing resources，Unable to cope with the next crisis。Cave explorers accept expert advice，They are fully aware that the next step is to wait for death，No miracle can happen here。

The trapped people obviously don’t want to succumb to death，In order to avoid outside interference，They turned off communications，And launched an in-depth discussion，Eight hours later，Wetmore, one of the trapped people, asked a question on behalf of all the trapped people: What if the flesh and blood of one of them were eaten，Can you live for another ten days？To bet365 cricket odds question，Medical experts gave a positive answer。Here，Experts obviously did not provide any alternative means of survival for the trapped people。Continue，The trapped person asked three questions: First，Is it possible to draw lots to decide who should be eaten？Second，Is there a judge or other official in the rescue team who can answer bet365 cricket odds question？Third，Is there any pastor or priest willing to answer the above questions？

In essence，The first question concerns whether the decision to eat a human being can be made through a democratic process。Lottery is the most primitive and basic democratic procedure，Considered the most just。Because it’s here，It is not humans who make judgments，But some kind of power that no one knows。Actually，They did end up rolling the dice。According to Fuller，They discussed it repeatedly，To ensure fairness。The second question concerns whether the law justifies eating one person to preserve the life of another。The third question can even be expanded，That is, not just asking questions to the pastor or priest，You can also ask a political scientist、A jurist or philosopher comes to ask questions。The context after bet365 cricket odds expansion is politics、The context of law and ethics。The problem of the trapped therefore becomes: from politics、From a legal and moral perspective，Is it legal to eat a person？

What a pity，None of the three questions raised by the trapped people were answered。Are you unwilling?，No one is able to answer？In the discussion of bet365 cricket odds case，No one has analyzed bet365 cricket odds problem。bet365 cricket odds is surprising，Because if bet365 cricket odds happened in normal society outside the cave，Won’t be a problem at all。But experts, especially jurists, obviously feel deeply confused here，They all chose silence。In bet365 cricket odds case，Why when the trapped person comes out of the predicament，Jurists say bet365 cricket odds with certainty，As if the truth is in hand？Whether it’s Fuller’s fictional ending，It’s still Saber’s fictional ending，The four rescued explorers were eventually hanged。Is it possible that the jurists remained silent when questioned by the trapped people，In order to give a conflict-free referee in the end？

Actually，During Fuller and Saber’s virtual briefings before the judge，You can also see a kind of confusion: the majority of judges think，In bet365 cricket odds case，Eating a person is not the same as murdering another person，Even those who advocate legal punishment，Also expressed a desire for forgiveness in private。The confusing thing about bet365 cricket odds fictional case，Why cannibalism is such a disgusting behavior in human history，Legitimacy becomes an issue here？In human history，Human cannibalism is not only in politics、Legal and morally inappropriate，It may even cause a physical revulsion in civilized people。However，Politics、Legal and ethics experts have given up on answering bet365 cricket odds question。If any expert here gives a negative answer，Will there be a different ending？bet365 cricket odds may be the ending，The trapped person knowingly committed the crime，He still ate one of them for self-preservation。Also possible，Such a plan is denied，They had no choice but to find other ways out that experts could not think of，And so on。But of course the ending that people who believe in experts can think of is: the rescue team found the trapped people ten days later，Just five corpses。

Why experts are confused，Basically it’s because I don’t dare to give the answer。Because once a positive answer is given，They allowed the death of one of them，And if the answer is negative，It may lead to the death of five people。bet365 cricket odds is exactly the same as the "Trolley Problem"。In bet365 cricket odds sense，The judges described by Fuller and Saber are "hindsights"。They are soberly aware，bet365 cricket odds is an exceptional state of human life，In bet365 cricket odds state，Eating a person may be justified。Behind bet365 cricket odds seems to express a Hartian belief in natural law，That is, the belief that self-preservation is a "natural necessity"，So，Eating others to protect yourself is also a natural necessity。And self-preservation is the basis of law and morality，They cannot give any negative comments。It’s just that such an evaluation conflicts with the concepts of morality and justice generally pursued by human society，They are unwilling to deny the latter。They want the best of both worlds，So I dare not take the responsibility of giving an answer。

In bet365 cricket odds fictitious case，Legal knowledge is actually put on hold (according to Fuller's virtual，Almost all human expert knowledge has been put on hold here)。bet365 cricket odds makes the mystery of the cave into a non-human situation。However，How to leave a non-human situation to a legal person？In bet365 cricket odds sense，The Mysterious Case in the Cave itself is a great irony to experts: they often follow others when they face exceptional conditions，The decision of hindsight。And those judge’s statements should have been given as expert advice to the trapped people during consultation。The question is: since they couldn’t give a definite answer before，Why can I give a definite answer after bet365 cricket odds？

Previous research has always focused on which legal doctrine is reflected behind the statement。But the really interesting thing is not exactly the judge’s speech，Instead, we should think about the limitations of expert knowledge in the state of exception。Whenever legal experts discuss a state of exception，We should all go back to Fuller’s fictional case，Look at yourself when you really face an exception，What definite answer can you give，These answers are not for evaluation，It is used to guide human beings’ specific lives。Of course the people trapped in the cave cannot continue to argue and reflect endlessly，bet365 cricket odds have to make a choice as soon as possible: whether to eat a person to save themselves，Still looking for another way，Or face death calmly。

Behind Fuller’s fictional case actually reflects a kind of arrogance among legal experts，They try to provide solutions to the trapped people within the legal framework，Attempting to reconcile humanity's right to self-preservation and the pursuit of justice，Attempting to define human rights and obligations in a state of exception through reason。In bet365 cricket odds regard，Fuller curiously refers to theologians、Priests and moralists are excluded，Decided they couldn’t give an answer，However，Perhaps they can frankly admit that such an exceptional state is beyond the reach of human reason，It is often a moment of miracles。People do not obey the guidance of experts in a state of exception，But listen to the guidance of life itself。Just imagine，If here，The voices of experts are not the last ones，Here，There is a love for fellow human beings，The voice of conscience resounds in the hearts of the trapped people，Then，They would not choose a seemingly scientific democratic process to decide who should be killed，They will have completely different choices。Though we don’t know what such an alternative is，But what can be thought of is，bet365 cricket odds choice must have nothing to do with legality or illegality，Opposite，They will provide a new way of facing exceptions，Thereby giving birth to new human rights and obligations under a state of exception，The basis of bet365 cricket odds kind of rights and obligations is certainly not human law，But the law of conscience。

　　(The author is an associate professor bet365 cricket odds Department of Philosophy, Sun Yat-sen University)