2023，Generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) has set off a global boom in the development of artificial intelligence technology。Large-scale model products represented by ChatGPT of the "Open Intelligence Research Center" (OpenAI) demonstrate bet365 withdrawal cross-scenarios、Multipurpose、Intelligent universal task processing capabilities。Relying on massive data、Super powerful algorithm、The combination of huge computing power，Large model is being analyzed、Decision、Understanding、Achieve performance comparable to humans in tasks such as creation。Driving by this craze, global technology companies have launched their own large artificial intelligence models，Chinese companies have also started the “Battle of Hundreds of Models”。Among the top ten scientific figures in 2023 recently announced by "Nature" magazine，First inclusion of non-human ChatGPT。Outside these progressive crazes，The voices of doubt and warning about artificial intelligence have never stopped。Geoffrey Hinton, the “father of deep learning”, expressed concerns about a series of risks that may arise from bet365 withdrawal，Believe that a large amount of false information produced by AIGC floods the Internet，bet365 withdrawal will also disrupt the job market，It may even become a killer robot with autonomous capabilities。Yuval Harari, author of "A Brief History of Humankind" also pointed out，Because artificial intelligence is mastering language beyond the average human level，Therefore, we are also grasping the key to invade the human civilization system，It may even lead to the end of the era of human dominance。

Broadly speaking，bet365 withdrawal refers to a socio-technical system created by computers and algorithms，The purpose is to imitate、Augment or replace humans。Just like the above situation where enthusiasm and doubt coexist，The impact of bet365 withdrawal on society is still undecided。Although bet365 withdrawal practitioners, including technology companies and designers, have put forward the slogan “bet365 withdrawal for good”，But there are still different opinions on what “social good” is。A way to contribute to this discussion from a social science perspective，It is to promote the design and governance principles of bet365 withdrawal product development from "individual-centered" to "society-centered"。And before that，It is a useful attempt to clarify four myths about bet365 withdrawal。

The first myth is that bet365 withdrawal seems neutral，In fact, it is biased。bet365 withdrawal technology is increasingly used for decision-making，Algorithmic results may determine who gets the job，Who can get social welfare assistance，Who is more likely to be arrested。One assumption in using bet365 withdrawal to make decisions is that the machine is “impartial”，Always fairer than others。However，Sociologists have long discovered "bias" in bet365 withdrawal design and application。The "bias" of artificial intelligence comes from data and algorithms。The output of machine learning strongly depends on the input data，These data include existing data from various social institutions，Also includes daily data generated in real time。No matter which category，The data itself is deeply embedded in the fabric of social inequality，When this data is used to train the large model again，It will reinforce the existing inequality。Research has found，Resume pool generated in the context of gender inequality in the labor market，After being learned by machine，The output applicant scores will significantly disadvantage women。The large police model trained based on the data of existing arrest history，Also more inclined to define people of color as high-risk groups for crime。Even if the data itself is unbiased，Algorithm design choices、The presentation of information on the interface will also aggravate one’s own prejudices。Currently，Concerns about the fairness of bet365 withdrawal have spawned various initiatives aimed at addressing such issues，Including bet365 withdrawal Ethics Alliance、Open source bet365 withdrawal fairness toolkit、Government regulatory framework, etc.。More effective implementation of these measures，There is undoubtedly a need to be more integrated with existing research results on social structures and the mechanisms that generate inequality in the social sciences，To break away from the current shallow crowd classification ideas，Form a more effective mechanism-led intervention framework。

The second myth is that bet365 withdrawal seems accurate，In reality it is wrong。Generative bet365 withdrawal is widely used to generate text、image、Contents such as sounds and videos。Content generated by bet365 withdrawal participation or even dominance is increasingly appearing in the media、On commercial and even academic platforms。Limitations from the technology itself and computing power costs，Making the content generated by bet365 withdrawal not as accurate as it seems，False information often appears in very credible forms，Confusing the audience who lacks discernment，This phenomenon is called bet365 withdrawal hallucination。The relevant research team found that the hallucination rate of the main generative bet365 withdrawal platforms on the market is between 3% and 27%。If the content generated by bet365 withdrawal is only for private use，The impact of information error may not be significant。But once these contents are used in the public domain such as court judgment、Business Promotion、At the time of disease diagnosis，There will be serious consequences。For example，Some voters were affected by the information provided by bet365 withdrawal，I believe the candidate has a history of accepting bribes，Just give up support for it；The forged case library generated by bet365 withdrawal misled the judge in deciding the case；Fake medical research fabricated by bet365 withdrawal，Affects the effectiveness of treatment plans, etc.。After realizing the possible impact of these "confident nonsense" of bet365 withdrawal，Currently developers have formed some countermeasures，For example, use more accurate prompt words、Integrate human supervision mechanism、Adopt retrieval enhancement generation method、Identifies bet365 withdrawal-generated content, etc.。However，In addition to these technological changes aimed at enhancing the accuracy of bet365 withdrawal，We also need to deal with the social impact of bet365 withdrawal information bias，Improve audience identification information、Ability to verify information，Establish relevant regulations，Clearly clarify the responsible entities for the social consequences of information generated by human-machine cooperation。

The third myth is that bet365 withdrawal seems to be omnipotent，Limited in reality。From decision-making bet365 withdrawal to generative bet365 withdrawal，Machines can not only help humans achieve autonomous driving、Tasks in professional fields such as face recognition and intelligent decision-making，It has also evolved to the stage where it is capable of independently creating new content。Automated processes replace repetitive tasks，With the wave of intelligence, people are worried that the omnipotent bet365 withdrawal will completely replace the human labor force。Related reports found that the use of large language model tools will affect 80% of employees in the U.S. labor market，Especially for high-paying groups。In the discussion of the relationship between bet365 withdrawal and human labor，A core debate is replacement or augmentation。On the one hand，bet365 withdrawal is indeed good at completing tasks that can be converted into clear parameters，such as natural language translation、Text writing with a clear style、Data analysis and summary、Stylized user services, etc.；But on the other hand，The limitations of bet365 withdrawal are also very obvious，In some cases that require a lot of tacit knowledge、Complex reasoning、Emotional Perception、Competencies in the highly specialized tasks of social interaction are still stretched thin。Research has shown，In the judicial field，bet365 withdrawal’s risk assessment tools are no better than humans。bet365 withdrawal is replacing some jobs，Other new jobs will be generated，Like prompt word engineer、Robot application technician、bet365 withdrawal Engineering Technician、bet365 withdrawal trainer, etc.。Incorporating the skills required for these emerging occupations into the design of the vocational education framework will be a very useful measure。Therefore，We don’t need to worry about being “completely replaced by bet365 withdrawal”，Instead, we should actively plan for human and bet365 withdrawal collaboration，Clear what bet365 withdrawal can and cannot do，Guide it to empower the human workforce，To promote the overall improvement of production efficiency。

The fourth myth is that bet365 withdrawal seems to be universally beneficial，In reality, unequal。Some people call bet365 withdrawal a general technological innovation，Its promotion of human productivity can even be compared with the steam engine、Electricity is comparable to computers。While we are excited about the huge productivity potential of bet365 withdrawal，We also need to see the possibility of bet365 withdrawal continuing or even deepening the existing inequality structure。These inequalities are reflected between regions、Between companies and between different groups of workforce。The development and application of bet365 withdrawal requires huge capital and technology investment，So they are often concentrated in some countries and regions，Showing the spatial inequality of new technologies。In addition，Whether it is the acquisition of data as the basic raw material for large model prediction tasks，Development of algorithms，It’s still the supply of computing power，Both companies with digital infrastructure platform advantages are more likely to be deeply involved in the research and development and application of bet365 withdrawal。And this will result in each company’s market share、Polarization in terms of economic and political influence。The impact of bet365 withdrawal technology application on the labor market is not uniform，Digital control for workers in low-skilled positions，The rise of bet365 withdrawal-related positions that require special skills often coincides with the rise，Expanding existing inequalities in the traditional labor market。The above inequality existed even before the emergence of bet365 withdrawal technology，It is the social baseline fact outside the large model。Existing research in social sciences helps people understand how these inequalities are formed，Thus promoting more fair bet365 withdrawal applications。

bet365 withdrawal technology was proposed in the 1950s，Nowadays, it is rapidly and widely used in many fields of social life，Gradually and deeply participate in social life。However，The impact of bet365 withdrawal on society is still an area that needs to be explored。This article sorts out four myths about bet365 withdrawal，Calling for more in-depth research on artificial intelligence in social sciences。In the era of intelligence，Social scientists should actively participate in this debate about new technologies and society，Combined with long-term research on social inequality and social structural changes，Promote the transformation of artificial intelligence from "human-centered" to "society-centered" design and service principles。

(The author is an associate professor bet365 withdrawal Department of Sociology, Fudan University)