The Book of Songs is one of the important carriers of the traditional Chinese ideological and cultural，Study on the Book of Songs，Promotion of the traditional Chinese culture and literary thoughts。The Tongcheng School is a literary genre that almost runs through the history of the history of the Qing Dynasty，Not only engaged in the summary of creation and literary theory，At the same time, it also involves study research to varying degrees，Among them, the research on the Book of Songs is the most significant。Through inspections and sorting out the research of the Tongcheng School for the Book of Songs，You can grasp the academic personality of the Tongcheng School，Find the positioning of the time span for the nearly 300 years of the Qing Dynasty，It is conducive to deepening the understanding and research of Tongcheng School，and can fill the blankness for the study of the Book of Songs。

　Bet365 app download

Research on the Book of Songs in the Tongcheng Party，For the special comment、Criticism with the characteristics of the Chinese nation bet365 Play online games has made a lot of contributions。

Tongcheng Sanzu Fang Bao、Liu Dazhen、Yao Yan，Including Zeng Guofan in the later period、Wu Rulun、Wu Yisheng，There are commentary works，Except the Book of Songs，The objects of the evaluation are wide，Involved in the four parts of the Scriptures。Study on the literary activity of the "Book of Songs" through the Congcheng School of Poetry，Kaozhi Tongcheng School's evaluation of Chinese classics，So as to evaluate the contribution of Chinese -style criticism of one of Tongcheng party evaluations。

The concept of literary concepts of Tongcheng faction affects the study of the Tongcheng scholars on the Book of Songs，It is mainly reflected in the evaluation of the Book of Songs，If Liu Dazhen believes that the most important factor in the article is "God Qi"。The so -called "God Qi"，Is a "way of writing"，That is the way of composition and prerequisites to control language，belongs to the category of art and aesthetics，Different from righteousness、Book Roll、Economic and other "Reality of Walk"，That is the material of the article、Content and thought。This actually emphasizes the independence of literature，With my own hobbies、Related to stand by the literati。Liu Dazhen commented on the "Book of Songs" with the orientation of literature，It is based on your own literary view。

In the late bet365 Play online games Qing Dynasty (Republic of China) Du Genmu Book Board Print "Book of Songs" two volumes，Writer signed Wu Runlun，Actually there is Liu Dahuan, edited by Wu Rulun、Yao Yan、Zeng Guofan Three Family Comments，Plus the comments from Wu Rulun and his son Wu Yisheng，Can be counted as five reviews。A lot of books that Yao Yan reviewed，He believes that "the circle is inspired by the meaning，Some more than the commentary "，Therefore, "learning is the most beneficial"。Yao Yan paper advocates justice、Research、Sanquan three -in -one，Although the three are papers，But it is also applicable to the characteristics of the review of the Book of Songs。Of course，Yao Yan asks for composition when it is reasonable、Research、Fusion of the three words，These three factors in the evaluation are often separated。This is the difference between writing articles and comments。In his "Book of Songs",，Content of both righteousness，There is also the content of the project，There is also the content of the technique of resigning Zhang Wencai。

　Innovation of the study of the "Book of Songs" in the Tongcheng School

The difference between the study of the study of the Book of Songs and the mainstream of the Book of Songs in the Qing Dynasty，The characteristics and reasons for the formation are yet to be further summarized by contemporary Bet365 app download scholars。In the author's view，The study of the "Book of Songs" in the Tongcheng School is different from the mainstream "Book of Songs" Park Xue Research and the "Book of Songs" in the "Book of Songs".，The first is the prominent content of literary criticism; the second is the penetration of the Tongcheng School literary theory in the criticism of the Book of Songs; the third is the influence of the Tongcheng School's ideas of traditional scriptures。For the scope involved in the third characteristic，Scholars who are currently studying in academic circles gradually increase，But most of them are scriptures and scriptures，instead of linked the classics of Tongcheng School with its literary theory。The study of the "Book of Songs" of the Tongcheng School，It has always been concentrated in a few celebrities and their works，Such as Ma Ruichen's "Mao Shi Chuan Ji Tongji", etc.，and the discussion of the scriptures of the Book of Songs of other literati in Tongcheng is very small，Ru Fang Bao's "Poetry Righteous Correction"、Yao Yan's "Nine Classics"、Guan Tong's "Seven Classics"、Fang Dongshu's "Sinology and Commercial Exchange"、Fang Zongcheng’s "The Capital of the Classics", etc.。If it is limited to several works，It is not easy to understand the specific attitude and inheritance element of the original classic that influences Bet365 lotto review the literary creation of the Book of Songs.。

Tongcheng School's research from the Book of Songs from the perspective of literary，It is mainly reflected in the comments of the Book of Songs in the Tongcheng School。Comments on the Tongcheng School of the Book of Songs，I know Liu Dazhen today、Yao Yan、Zeng Guofan、Cao Yishi、Bao Guixing、Zhang Tailai、Wu Rulun and Wu Yusheng。Through the viewing of the "Book of Songs" above the people above，Finding rules，can be drawn for conclusion，That is the study of the Book of Songs in Tongcheng School，There is a trend of leaning from the traditional scientific vision to literary vision。This trend for the literary view of Tongcheng School、Prose Theory，It has the effect of penetration and influence，and the Tongcheng School comments itself also have independent literary appreciation value、Literary criticism value and literary theoretical value。Tongcheng School's research on the Book of Songs in the literary category，The biggest achievement is Liu Dazhen。Liu Dazhen is an important one in the evaluation of the Book of Songs.，Title "The Book of Songs"，Now Hidden Shanghai Library。Fang Dongshu's monograph "Zhao Mei Zhan Yan" in the discussion part of the Book of Songs and some other Tongcheng School scholars on the "Book of Songs" also have a certain visibility。

As for the study of the "Book of Songs" in the Bet365 app download Tongcheng School in the scope of pure traditional classics，It is also different from scholars in the "Book of Songs" based on the mainstream of the Qing Dynasty。Although they are most difficult to learn and skills in sinology, they are difficult to work with Chen Yan、Dai Zhen、Wang Niansun、Wang Yinzhizhi and other universities are compared with，but not all non -invasive gains。The Book of Songs in the scope of the classics of Tongcheng School has its own characteristics，That is understanding the Tonglin。For example, the characteristics of the Book of Songs studying the Book of Songs，1 is to train "Erya"、"Xue Jun Zhang Jian" and Xu Yingyu; the second is to quote the ability of old native explanation poems。

Look at the study of the "Book of Songs" in the Tongcheng School，On the one hand, the position of Tongcheng School is more dialectical and open，The views on the relationship between cultural and Taoism obviously expose the separation of the literary theory of traditional classics，Even there are signs of renovation such as deconstruction; on the other hand，There is always no shaking in the position of defending old culture and old literature。

　　(Author Unit: School of Literature, Anhui University)