On the other hand, reality，China's current thinking has been based on the context of Western Xue，Marxism that constitutes "critical strength" for the context of Western learning，Obviously the starting point of thinking for us，I need to learn to face reality like Marx，Open the future，Only in this way can we create a theory that interprets the future path that is different from the West and gives people in hope。

Although as Wolfgang Houg said，"The history of the entire 20th century workers and leftists、The historical materials of socialists and Marxists are enough to make people direct a tragedy "，but，Looking at the big thinker of the contemporary world，No one can avoid Marx avoided，This is also an undeniable fact。Because on one aspect，People are moving towards the social forms dominated by the capital logic explained by Marx; on the other hand,，People believe that Marx will continue to give us "power"，That is bet365 live casino games the power of transforming the world and the power of transforming people。

but but，For the research and dissemination of Marxism，The status quo of the theoretical research of Marxism today still has difficulty in，For example, "Version Learning Opise"、"Wei Xima is a horse"、"Suspension of China" and other embarrassing research dilemmas，This is essentially related to how we truly achieve the methodology of "interpreting Marx"。This aspect，The "three changes" of research need to realize research in the academic community。

　　Bet365 lotto review The result of simply innovating the methodology of interpreting Marx has now showed a predicament，That is, the respect of "grand narrative" from the traditional Marxist research institute to the research of "grand narrative" to focus on "small narrative" research，Really so -called "people are moving，Delivery for a while "。and in Western characters、In the process of introducing the topic，But forgot these doctrines, but they are not criticized for private ownership premise and thinking within the range that can be allowed by capital logic，and Marx is a prerequisite for challenging them to no longer question，The heterogeneity of the two is very obvious。

but，Some domestic researchers no longer discuss heterogeneous，Instead of thinking that Westerners talk about a concept、topic，The founders seem to be Marx or Marx once discussed，The process of "interpreting Marx" is likely to become just "thesis manufacturing"，What do you want to do for Marx's founding the doctrine。or，How can we continue to say something? Throughout Marx's text, it is not the theoretical deduction of "from text to text"，This can only cause two extremes，One is the "time of time" of the originalism，The other is the theoretical production of the current text "anti -note" Marx text。but，How can "liberation of people" possible，In a "post -revolutionary era" how to carry out "New Reflection of our Time Revolution"，This is the "Standardity Proposal" that we must always pay attention to when interpreting Marx at the moment，To establish your own research position、Research objects、Research method、Research conclusions。

　　From "We Thinking Marxism" to "How do we think about Marxist"

Some scholars thought，"Basic problems that Chinese thought in the world thought for Bet365 lotto review a hundred years，All caused by the relationship with Western thoughts。How to grasp this historic 'occurring relationship "? "In fact, this kind of question is how to establish the autonomy of Chinese academic discourse。On the other hand，China's current thinking has been based on the context of Western Xue，Marxism that constitutes "critical strength" for the context of Western learning，Obviously the starting point of thinking for us，I need to learn to face reality like Marx，Open the future，Only in this way can we create a theory that interprets the future path that is different from the West and gives people in hope。

Today，The Marxist philosophy community thinks more about Marxism in the sense of "historical"，That is the meaning of the meaning of Marxist text itself，instead of really standing this idea as the theoretical burden of the "ancient and modern Chinese and Western disputes" in the era of globalization。More serious is，Once we forget the ability to make theoretical thinking of "reality"，What is the use of Marx's sentences? This is also the reason why those versions of worshipers have repeatedly believed that they can't read Marx if they don't understand the version。The question is，As long as I have mastered Marx’s theoretical purpose，and capture Marx's thinking principles，If based on the original criticism of the capital rather than the copy of school changes such，and the ultimate purpose of understanding Marx thinking is to "transform the world"，can really get rid of the fate of "Marx written under the pen"。

　　From the "introduction of scattered western academic resources" to the "top -level design 'for solving Chinese problems"

Introduction to Western academic resources，Especially after the introduction of Western Marxism and post -Marxism，A clearer picture shows it，That is，Marx with the theme of "Liberation" to Western Marxism with the theme of "critical theory"，Then to the post -Marxist flow change with the theme of "radical discourse"。Compared with this is，The Chinese Marxist philosophy community has also realized the "modern" replacement of "capitalism" and sent Marx to the synonyms of modernity "critical theory"，and "Laureate the seat"。

This does mean，Critical object of Marxist philosophy、Critical methods may be reduced to Western Marxism and even Marxism's "cottage version"。Escape from this possible path，It can only be adjusted to the "China problem"，The perspective of thinking must also be from the "metaphysics critical" of Western Marxism、"Technical Criticism"、"Ideology Criticism" and other turning to Marx's "Capital Logic Criticism、Criticism of metaphysics、Political Logic Criticism "Trinity Perspective，and bet365 best casino games re -activate the strength to criticize capitalism，Put forward the current "Human Liberation AD"。For those who are trying to adhere to the capitalist system，Only "human liberation" is only identified as the theoretical discourse of "standardization" to give a strong response。

(This article is the State Social Science Fund Project (12CZX009) phase results)

(Author Unit: Department of Philosophy of East China Normal University)