bet365 Play online games_convincing，It also has

Home>Journal of Chinese Social Sciences>Humanities Lingnan>Lingnan Social Science>Scholar School

Original miscellaneous talks

October 29, 2013 09:41 Source: "Humanities Lingnan" October 23, 2013 Author: Chen Shaoming

& ldquo; Original & rdquo;，But what is the exact meaning，I have never pondered in the past。Since I am fortunate to participate in the & ldquo; Si Mian original prize & rdquo; after the event，This question emerges from time to time。

General awards are called & ldquo; Outstanding Achievement Award & rdquo; or & ldquo; Academic contribution award & rdquo;，and & ldquo; Si Mian original pioneering award & rdquo;。This intention is very good，But what works are academic original，It seems that there is no consistent understanding。For example，In the recommended work，Many are collective writing。The place where it makes people feel difficult，Is not whether the winner should be the editor or the author of each volume，and in many collaborators with consensus，how much is & ldquo; original & bet365 best casino games rdquo;。At least in philosophy，Classic works with cooperation between two or more are extremely rare。Unti -intuition，It is difficult to imagine a phenomenon of & ldquo; collective original & rdquo;。

Of course，Not said that collective works have no meaning，Integration of literature、Code of Dictionary、Combining of Tong History，All products for collective cooperation，is a tool for academic。Therefore，Excellent achievements contributed to the development of learning，Not necessarily an original work。Provide a knowledge platform for original thought，or the idea of perfecting the original thinking and applying it to specific academic topics，Naturally is the task of conventional academic work。

So，What is academic & ldquo; Original & rdquo;? Strict or higher requirements，It should be an unprecedented job，or to & ldquo;。But this is difficult or very rare。Usually，First refers to providing new works，This & ldquo; New & rdquo;，and it is not easy for ordinary scholars to think bet365 Play online games of。Then，The way of its argument must be understandable，Even if it is not completely convincing，It also has to be reasonable。other，It must also be inspired by similar or adjacent research theories，It has important academic significance，Lead academic trends，Specifically，Is there any follower or inheritor。In this case，True or more altitude works，It must stand up to the time test。

In China，Time span for more than 30 years，Humanities and academics selected with original works，At least such a effect should be achieved: it is not a dogma that has subverted a certain subject or thought，It provides a new academic paradigm，thus opened up new knowledge areas; both of them are more ideal。According to the author's opinion，At least like Hu Shi or Feng Youlan’s history of Chinese philosophy，Gu Jiegang's & ldquo; Ancient History said & rdquo;，and Fei Xiaotong's local Chinese research like the results，Only worthy of the original evaluation。

Take the history of philosophy as an example，"History Bet365 lotto review of Chinese Philosophy" (volume) with Hu Shi at the same time，And Xie Wuliang's "History of Chinese Philosophy"，But Xie Miliang's works are just new names，The content has no substantial change，Therefore, Hu Shi is the founder of this discipline。After a few years，Feng Youlan’s "History of Chinese Philosophy" is not a work of the mountains，But his philosophical taste reversed the direction of this discipline，It has a stronger shape for subsequent development，So his originality also got Jin Yuelin、Chen Yinque's recognition。Gu Jiegang's hypothesis，In the year, I was shocked，Although it is not convinced of everyone, especially those with conservative cultural tendencies，But the formation of the formalities of ancient history provides an academic paradigm，If it does not abuse its scope of application，Even in today's perspective，It also has its value。Fisher Tong's structural description of cultural traditions and rural social bet365 best casino games relations，Simple and profound，Although the problem has progressed rapidly by the research or anthropology in recent decades & ldquo;，3557_3579。

If measured with the above views or similar results，The nominated and shortlisted works in this event，The choice of choice is actually not big。Why is this? There are two possibilities，First, the current humanities and academic overall loss of innovation ability，The second is the ability to lose evaluation & ldquo; original & rdquo;。

Look at the academic development of humanities，Only cultivating universal creative consciousness，Only the generation of original works。Cultivation of consciousness，You need to form a culture that encourages innovation。This culture must not only advocate it spiritually，There must be a variety of specific systems to protect。other，To review those academic systems that hinder innovation。

Back to & ldquo; Si Mian Original Pioneer & RDQUO; Come up，This award is the most different place with all the domestic awards I have participated bet365 live casino games in，It is voting according to the rules，announcement immediately，No need to add other censorship or balanced interests other than academic。Only this，It is worth publicly expressed respect for its creators。

(Author Unit: Department of Philosophy at Sun Yat -sen University)

Editor in charge: Virtual system user