General mobile bet365 in Chinese society has its special historical and cultural background，Different measurement methods will also affect the research results。Clarifying the meaning of general mobile bet365 in the Chinese context，can have a deeper understanding of its situation in China。General mobile bet365 includes two elements: mobile bet365 level and mobile bet365 radius。mobile bet365 level refers to the strength of norms of cooperation；mobile bet365 radius refers to the size of the circle in which cooperation norms take effect。Both are of great significance to social development，The greater the mobile bet365 radius，The more inclusive the circle of mobile bet365 is；With a given mobile bet365 radius，The higher the level of mobile bet365，The more frequent the cooperation within the circle。Assessing general mobile bet365 requires considering both mobile bet365 radius and mobile bet365 level。

The radius of mobile bet365 illustrates a common phenomenon in human society，That is, everyone has a circle，And think people in the circle are more trustworthy than people outside the circle，Circle size varies from person to person。Acquaintance mobile bet365 is cross-culturally consistent，The size of the mobile bet365 radius mainly depends on general mobile bet365。Most survey studies use the same question to measure general mobile bet365，That is, "generally speaking，Do you agree that the vast majority of people in society are trustworthy？"This problem was first formulated by Newman in 1948，Intended to measure people’s perception of social distance、mobile bet365 of unfamiliar people。This question has many advantages，Simple and clear、Low rejection rate。But，This question does not further define what exactly is the “majority”，In particular, it is not clear whether different societies have the same understanding of this concept。This makes this measurement method always controversial。As Liskens and Huger asked，The concept of "the vast majority of people" is very important to those living in London、Do residents of a metropolis like Paris have the same meaning as residents of a small village in northern Sweden。Is the scope of “most people” cross-culturally consistent，Involving validity issues in general mobile bet365 research。

Does the concept of “the vast majority of people” meet this condition？Uslana thinks，This question can be used to measure general mobile bet365 in the United States，But there may be problems in other countries。Even in the United States，This question can only represent general mobile bet365 at the community level。For the Confucian cultural circle，The controversy over general mobile bet365 issues can further illustrate the unreasonableness of this measurement method。Fukuyama thinks，Countries in the Confucian cultural circle are all typical familialist countries，General mobile bet365 level is relatively low。However, previous research found that，If "whether you mobile bet365 the vast majority of people" is used as a measurement indicator of general mobile bet365，Countries under the influence of Confucian cultural circle (such as China、South Korea) all have high levels of general mobile bet365。This contradiction is most likely due to，In the Confucian cultural circle，People’s understanding of the concept of “the vast majority of people” is different from that in Western society。

We still use the question of mobile bet365 in the vast majority of people in society to measure general mobile bet365，And make horizontal comparisons between different countries，Use this to observe China’s general mobile bet365 position in the world，Analyzed data comes from the 6th round of World Values ​​Survey。This article selects China、Japan、South Korea、Singapore as a representative of Confucian cultural circle，Netherlands、New Zealand、Australia、Germany、The United States as a representative of the Western cultural circle。Research results show，The Netherlands has the highest proportion of people (66%) who believe that the vast majority of people in society are trustworthy，Then China (60%)、New Zealand (55%)、Australia (51%)、Germany (45%)、Singapore (37%)、Japan (36%)。Overall，Except for this outlier in China，The general mobile bet365 situation in other countries is roughly in line with Fukuyama’s prediction，That is, most countries under the influence of the Confucian cultural circle have lower general mobile bet365。As for why China has such high general mobile bet365，Is it because the Chinese understand the vast majority of people differently，We will explain through further comparative analysis。The sixth round of the World Values ​​Survey asked respondents about their views on their family members、Neighbor、People you know、The mobile bet365 status of people meeting for the first time。We still select the above countries for comparison，Look at the proportion of respondents who mobile bet365 or relatively mobile bet365 specific groups，To examine whether the mobile bet365 radius of different countries is different。

It can be seen from the analysis results，The phenomenon of deciding whether to mobile bet365 the other party based on the distance between the other party and oneself is cross-culturally consistent。It is not appropriate to completely attribute the mobile bet365 issue in Chinese society to the cultural structure of differential order。Data indicates，Residents of all countries mobile bet365 their family members above 90%，The highest reached 98.4%，The lowest reached 92.7%。With the estrangement of relationship，The proportion of mobile bet365 is also decreasing。For those who meet for the first time，Residents of various countries generally show distrust。Australia has the highest proportion, only 43.9% of residents mobile bet365 people they meet for the first time，The lowest is only 8 in Japan.8%，China is 10.9%。On mobile bet365 in various groups，China and Japan are most similar。The mobile bet365 ratios of residents in both countries for each group are very close，The only difference is mobile bet365 in neighbors，The proportion of Chinese residents who mobile bet365 their neighbors is much higher than that of Japanese residents。This also reflects to a certain extent that China and Japan both belong to the Confucian cultural circle，The mobile bet365 radius of residents of the two countries is very similar。But when asked "whether the vast majority of people in society are trustworthy"，The mobile bet365 score of Chinese residents is much higher than that of Japanese residents，When residents of the two countries have similar levels of mobile bet365 in each group within the mobile bet365 radius，We can say that this phenomenon is probably because residents of the two countries have different understandings of "the vast majority of people"。

Even though we are in the same Western cultural circle，People also have different understandings of the concept of "the vast majority of people"。It can be seen from the analysis，Australian residents have high mobile bet365 rates in all groups，Even for people meeting for the first time，There are also 43.9% of people said they were trustworthy。For other groups，A very high proportion (more than 60%) of Australians say they can be trusted。However，When asked about mobile bet365 in the vast majority of people in society，Only 51% of Australian residents say the vast majority of people are trustworthy。Visible，“The vast majority of people” as an abstract concept，In fact, it is difficult to say which group the respondents have in mind。As opposed to this，The mobile bet365 radius of Dutch residents is not very large，Dutch residents also mostly mobile bet365 people they know well。But，When asked about mobile bet365 in the vast majority of people in society，Dutch residents have the highest mobile bet365 ratio in the world (66%)。Therefore，When making cross-country comparisons，Be careful with any concept，Even if these countries are in the same cultural circle。

Since the main discussion is China’s mobile bet365 issue，In this part we use the data from the China General Social Survey in 2012。In this data，The measurement of general mobile bet365 mainly includes two measurement methods: one is to ask whether you think the vast majority of people in society are trustworthy；The other is to ask if you think strangers are trustworthy。We compared the general mobile bet365 level of Chinese residents under two measurement methods。When asked about the level of mobile bet365 in the vast majority of people in society，The proportion of Chinese people who answered very trusting and relatively trusting reached 65.11%，Almost the same as the results of the 6th round of World Values ​​Survey。This further proves the robustness of the data。When asked about mobile bet365 in strangers，The proportion of those who answered very trusting and somewhat trusting was only 7.27%。It can be seen from this，In the consciousness of Chinese people，The vast majority of people in society do not include strangers，But someone who is somewhat related to myself。Chinese people’s mobile bet365 radius does not extend to strangers。This can also partially explain that the higher level of general mobile bet365 in Chinese society may be due to the fact that the concept of "the vast majority of people" is not suitable for measuring general mobile bet365 in the Chinese context。Chinese residents mobile bet365 most people between acquaintances (71.9%) and strangers (7.27%）。This can also initially explain why the general level of mobile bet365 among Chinese people is so high，Because although the Chinese people’s mobile bet365 radius is small，But the level of mobile bet365 within the radius is high。

Comprehensive analysis of the previous article，We can see that using the question "do you mobile bet365 the vast majority of people" to measure general mobile bet365 is very problematic。The range of groups imagined by residents of different countries when they see the concept of "the vast majority of people" is not consistent。When conducting cross-national comparative analysis，We must be careful when using concepts。Research on mobile bet365 issues，Only when people have a consistent understanding of the object of mobile bet365，It makes sense to compare mobile bet365 levels。

　(This article is part of the National Social Science Foundation’s major project “Research on Spatial Sociology of China’s Urban-Rural Integrated Development” (20&ZD149) phased results)

(Author’s Affiliation: School of Humanities, Donghua University)