Explore general trust localization measurement
October 27, 2021 09:18 Source: "China Social Sciences" October 27, 2021 Total 2274 Author: Han Yanchao

The general trust of Chinese society has its special historical and cultural background,Different measurement methods will also affect the research effect。Clarify the meaning of general trust in the Chinese context,Can understand its condition in China more deeply。General trust includes two elements: the level of trust and trust radius。Trust level refers to the strength of the cooperative norms; the trusted radius refers to the size of the circle of cooperation specifications。Both are of great significance for social development,The greater the trust radius,The more tolerance in the trust circle; when the radius of a given trust is given,The higher the level of trust,The more frequent cooperation in the circle。Evaluation general trust needs to consider the radius and trust level at the same time。

Trust radius explains a common phenomenon in human society,That is, everyone has a circle,And thinks that people in the circle are more trustworthy than those outside the circle,The size of the circle varies from person to person。Mother trust has cross -cultural consistency,The size of the trust radius mainly depends on the general trust。Most of the investigations and research are used to using the same question to measure general trust,That is, "Generally speaking,Do you agree with most people in the society to trust? "This problem was first designed by Newman in 1948,It is intended bet365 live casino games to measure people who are far away from society、Trust of unfamiliar people。This problem has many advantages,As simple and clear、Low answering rate。but,This problem has not further defined what exactly is "most people",Especially different society's understanding of this concept is not the same, there is no explanation。This makes this measurement method has always been controversial。As asked by Liskens and Hu Ge,The concept of "most people" is for living in London、Has residents in metropolises such as Paris and residents living in small villages in northern Sweden have the same significance。Is the scope of "most people" have cross -cultural consistency,Touch the validity of general trust research。

Is the concept of "most people" have this condition? USrina thinks,This problem can be used in the United States to measure general trust,But there may be problems in other countries。Even in the United States,This question can only represent the general trust at the community level。For the Confucian cultural circle,Disputes of general trust issues can further illustrate the irrationality of this measurement method。Fushan thinks,The countries in the Confucian cultural circle are typical familyism countries,The general trust level is relatively low。However, previous studies found,If "whether most people trust the vast majority" as a measurement indicator for general trust,State under the influence of the Confucian cultural circle (such as China、Korea) There are high -level general trust。This contradiction bet365 live casino games is likely to be because of,In the Confucian cultural circle,The understanding of the concept of "most people" is different from Western society。

We still use the trust of most people in society to measure general trust,and make horizontal comparisons for different countries,To observe China's general trust in the world,Analysis data from World Value Round 6 Investigation。Select China for this article、Japan、Korea、Singapore as the representative of the Confucian cultural circle,Netherlands、New Zealand、Australia、Germany、The United States as a representative of the Western cultural circle。Research results show,The Dutch has the highest percentage of population (66%). I believe most people in society are worth trust,Next is China (60%)、New Zealand (55%)、Australia (51%)、Germany (45%)、Singapore (37%)、Japan (36%)。Overall,Except this abnormal value of China,The general trust status of other countries is roughly in line with Fushan's forecast,Most countries under the influence of the Confucian cultural circle have lower general trust。As for why China has such a high general trust,Is it because the Chinese people have different understanding of most people,We will explain through further comparative analysis。World Value In the 6th round of surveys, I asked the person who was investigated to the family、Neighbors、People I know、Trust situation of the person who met for the first time。We still choose the above countries for comparison,See the proportion of the respondent to answer or relatively trust the specific group,To examine whether the trust radius Bet365 app download of different countries is different。

From the analysis results, it can be known,Depending on the relationship between the other party's relationship with himself, it has recently decided not to give trust. This phenomenon is cross -cultural consistency。The cultural structure that completely attributes the trust of Chinese society into a differential pattern is not appropriate。Data indicates,Residents of various countries have the trust of their families more than 90%,up to 98.4%,The lowest also reached 92.7%。Alienation with the relationship,The proportion of trust is also decreasing。For those who meet the first time,Residents of various countries generally show disagreement。The highest proportion of Australia also has only 43.9%of the residents who trust the first meeting,The lowest is that Japan is only 8.8%,China is 10.9%。In terms of trust in various groups,China and Japan are the most similar。Residents of the two countries are very close to the proportion of trust in various groups,The only difference is the trust of neighbors,The proportion of Chinese residents trust neighbors is much higher than that of Japanese residents。This also reflects to a certain extent that China and Japan belong to the Confucian cultural circle,The trust radius of the residents of the two countries is extremely similar。When asked if "most people in society are worth trust",The trust score of Chinese residents is much higher than that of Japanese residents,The level of trust in the trust radius of the two countries is almost the same.,We can say that this phenomenon bet365 live casino games is likely bet365 Play online games to be because the understanding of the "most people" of the two countries is different。

Even in the West Cultural Circle,The understanding of the concept of "most people" is also different。From the analysis, it can be known,Australian residents' trust ratio of various groups is high,Even for those who meet for the first time,There are also 43.9%of people who are worthy of trust。For other groups,Australians who have a very high percentage (more than 60%) say they can trust。But,When asked about the trust of most people in society,Only 51%of Australian residents said most people are worth trust。Visible,"Most people" as an abstract concept,It is difficult to say which group of the investigators.。Compared with this,The trust radius of the Dutch residents is not big,The trust objects of the Dutch residents are mostly concentrated in those they are familiar with。but,When asked about the trust of most people in society,Dutch residents have the highest trust ratio in the world (66%)。So,When doing multinational comparison,Renyi concept must be cautious,Even if these countries are in the same cultural circle。

Because it mainly discusses China's trust issues,This part we use the data of 2012 in China。In this data,The measurement of general trust mainly includes two measurement methods: one is to ask if most people in society are worthy of trust; the other is to ask whether strangers deserve trust。We compared the general trust level of Chinese residents under the comparison of two measurement methods。When asked about the degree of trust in most people in society,The proportion bet365 Play online games of Chinese answers very trust and comparative trust reached 65.11%,The results of the 6th round of surveys in world values ​​are almost the same。This further proves the stability of the data。When asked about trust in strangers,The proportion of answers is very trustworthy and comparative trust is only 7.27%。This can be seen,In the consciousness of Chinese people,Most people in society do not include strangers,but a person who has a little bit of something to do with yourself。The radius of the Chinese trust has not expanded to strangers。This can also be partially explained that the general trust level of the higher Chinese society may be due to the concept of "most people" in China.。Chinese residents' trust in the vast majority of people is between acquaintances (71.9%) and strangers (7.27%)。At this point, it can also be preliminarily explained why the general trust level of Chinese people is so high,Because the radius of the Chinese trust is small,But the level of trust within the radius is high。

Comprehensive analysis of the previous article,We can find that the problem of using "trust the vast majority" is used to measure the general trust in general trust。Residents Bet365 app download of different countries when they see the concept of "the vast majority of people" are not consistent。When conducting multinational comparative analysis,We must be careful about the use of concepts。Specific to trust in trust,Only when people understand the object of trust,The level of comparative trust is only meaningful。

 Bet365 app download

(Author Unit: School of Humanities of Donghua University)

Bet365 lotto review Editor in charge: Chen Jing
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com An Bei 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026