Current，New crown pneumonia's epidemic affects all aspects of social life，The field of science is no exception。Content of scientific research、mode、direction and the self -knowledge of scientific researchers have been affected to varying degrees。In this case，Has the public's views on science and scientists changed? Our reporter interviewed relevant scholars。

　　bet365 live casino games

European Revitalization Development Bank economist Cevat Giray Akso and others recently studied the impact of epidemiography on scientists and scientific research authority。Sensitive age puppets based on psychological research，That is, the end of adolescence and early adult (18-25 years) is a critical period for forming a value system，After that，The "attitude and sensibility" of people decreased sharply and maintained at a lower level。Researchers combine Huikang Global Monitoring Data in 2018 with global epidemic data since the 1970s，Identification of interviewees who lived out of the country at the age of 18-25。Huikang Global Monitoring is a public opinion survey on the public's attitude towards science and major hygiene challenges。

Bet365 app download Researchers discovered，In the age of 18-25, an interviewee who has experienced epidemic cosmetics has a lower degree of trust in scientists，They do not believe that scientists working in private enterprises are beneficial to the public，Do not believe that scientists working in colleges and universities are honest。The interviewees who have experienced a large -scale epidemic on the age of 18-25 years old have the confidence of scientists，11%lower than the interviewee who has not experienced an epidemic in the same period。When asked if science itself is worth trust，The respondents expressed their confidence in scientific potential，also mentioned the importance of scientific research related to disease，But they have a low degree of trust in scientific research individuals。Akzoi and others found that after studying the impact of scientific education on the respondents，Interviewees who have received good scientific education have a high degree of trust in scientists，And the impact of this trust is relatively small。

Akzoi said，The epidemic will not change people's views on the science itself，But may weaken people's trust in scientists，Especially people who are in a critical period in the formation of values。Therefore，Scientists in the field of public health should try to think about how to show the credibility and honesty of scientists, bet365 best casino games especially the younger generations。

　　Actively promote the transformation of scientific research

Craig Callener, a professor at the Department of Philosophy, the Department of Philosophy of the University of California, said，The impact of the epidemic of new crown pneumonia is global，It needs to be scientifically responded quickly and effectively。The scientific community should actively find solutions，Prepare for the next challenge。

Usually，The process of scientific research is relatively slow，Can't meet public demand in time。It takes 12 years to move from the laboratory to the average of the shelves，The peer evaluation process of academic journals for several months or even years，Scientific research results are rarely open to the public for free，The data or code used in the Research Institute is not widely shared。Insufficient funding obtained from disease research，Large -scale pharmaceutical companies have limited investment in R & D vaccine。But after the outbreak of this epidemic，The scientific and government scientific research management departments made positive response in unprecedented ways。such as，Early January，Chinese scientists preliminarily confirmed that the new coronary virus is the pathogen of the epidemic，Timely notifying the epidemic information to the World Health Organization，and Bet365 lotto review share pre -publishing data on the Internet。At the end of January，Nearly 120 scientific research institutions around the world、Academic Journal、Scientific research funding agencies agree to share research on the foundation and data of the new crown virus。mid -March，The scientific and technical consultants of the multinational governments call on academic journals and publishing houses to voluntarily provide new papers and data related papers and data，At present, more than 50 institutions have responded to the call。Multi -country governments have set up a special research fund for new crown pneumonia，Cooperative cooperation with independent laboratories and private enterprises and open the rapid approval channel for new crown drugs。

From Karland,，Scientific research on the epidemic of new coronary pneumonia this time is faster、Public，consistent with public demand，Among them, there are many opportunities to make scientific research better。But at the same time，It is also necessary to avoid accelerating the scientific research process too fast、omitting peer evaluation may lead to adverse consequences such as information that has not been fully reviewed and verified into the public domain。International Science Council、UNESCO、The World Health Organization and other institutions regard science as a global Bet365 app download public item，Call for the acquisition channel of scientific research results、Improving the incentive mechanism，to make scientific research activities more matched with the public interest。The crisis allows people to recognize the importance of improving the global scientific research system，Treating a large -scale natural experiment on the social structure of science，Promoting people to establish a more fair、More effective、More social responsibility scientific research mechanism，Promoting "dividends" from scientific research from developed countries to developing countries。

Karand said，Many epidemic diseases need to be solved by scientific methods，The scientific community has made great progress in this anti -epidemic situation。Scientific researchers should be committed to solving emergency social problems，Fully tap the potential of science，Comprehensively respond to human needs。

　　Fully cope with global challenges

Policy makers should give full attention and trust in response to science and scientists。Karand thinks，Current，"Scientific Save Life" and "Belief Science are wrong" still exist，If the former becomes the mainstream attitude，More resources will be put into scientific research, especially in the field of public health research; if the latter occupies the lead，Doubt about science Bet365 app download may spread to other scientific issues。Karand told this reporter，Public sanitation models are lower accuracy，Hundreds of variables、Unknown laws、Massive incomplete data and other factors，Leading epidemic prediction has great uncertainty，This may have an adverse effect on scientific research。

Karand talk about，Social Sciences For Big Popularities、Climate change、Ecological degeneration、Global challenges such as environmental pollution play an important role。In the process of dealing with global challenges，Knowledge itself cannot tell people what to do，Need social sciences to solve problems。Public health research has strong interdisciplinary nature，It is difficult to separate the natural science and social sciences in it，Need to combine natural factors and social factors for research。Therefore，People need to be under the guidance of social sciences，Fully cope with global challenges。