This newspaper comprehensively reports from foreign media According to a new study，Academic journals use a registered reporting model that conducts peer review before the bet365 ohio promo code is officially started，It can improve the quality of scientific bet365 ohio promo code while reducing publication bias。

The British Times Higher Education website published a report on June 24th，The magazine "Nature·Human Behavior" published on the same day a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia in the United States、Brian A, co-founder and executive director of the Center for Open Science, an American non-profit organization. Nosek (Brian A. Nosek) et al. co-authored the article "Preliminary evidence on the comparison of bet365 ohio promo code quality between registered reports and standard publication models"。

According to "convention"，Peer review generally occurs after the academic journal editor receives the submission and selects it。But a subsequent problem is publication bias，That is, the specific results of the bet365 ohio promo code affect the decisions of the peer reviewers。For example，Studies with significant results are more likely to be published than studies with no results。To reduce publication bias，Nearly 300 academic journals have introduced a new publishing model: registration report。This model divides peer review into two stages，The first phase occurs during the bet365 ohio promo code design phase before data collection and analysis，The second stage occurs when the bet365 ohio promo code report is written and prepared for publication。bet365 ohio promo code has shown，The registered reporting model prevents journals from publishing only those studies that confirm the original hypothesis，bet365 ohio promo code using this model has citation rates similar to those that undergo traditional peer review。

To further understand the impact of registration reporting model on scientific bet365 ohio promo code quality，Nosek et al. asked 353 researchers to peer review 86 published papers in the fields of psychology and neuroscience。Among them, Group A (29 articles) adopted the registration reporting model，The first author of some papers in Group B (57 papers) is the same as Group A，The remaining papers were published in the same journal at the same time as Group A and have similar topics。Peer review at three time points (before study results are known、After the bet365 ohio promo code results are known、After publication) using 19 evaluation metrics (including methodological rigor and analysis、Overall quality、Discussion and results、Novelty、Creativity、Importance, etc.) to evaluate。Peer review results display，Group A and Group B in novelty、There is almost no difference in scores on indicators such as creativity，Group A on methodological rigor and analysis、Scores on overall quality and other indicators are significantly higher than those of Group B。This shows that the registration reporting model can improve the quality of scientific bet365 ohio promo code，Enhance the credibility of scientific documents。

According to researchers，The current registration reporting model is not widely adopted。Journals introducing this model focus on the fields of neuroscience and social behavior bet365 ohio promo code，But even within these areas，Papers using the registered reporting model are still in the minority。Nosek said，This is not because the registration reporting model is being boycotted，But because it is something new，Researchers need to work hard to change how they do bet365 ohio promo code、Understanding how to report bet365 ohio promo code results。Universities can help promote the registration reporting model，Promote its advantages to teachers and students，Or require some graduate theses to adopt this model。

Nosek thinks，Registered reporting model helps “liberate” scientific researchers，Focus them on the bet365 ohio promo code process，Instead of worrying about whether the journal considers your bet365 ohio promo code results worthy of publication。What should be taken seriously is the bet365 ohio promo code itself，Instead of getting a specific result。

　　（Wang Youran/Compiler）