In today's academic circles，Various academic indicators can be seen everywhere，For the quotation of the paper、High reference frequency index、Periodical influence factor or similar indicators, etc.，These indicators are regarded as a standard for understanding a research contribution or the academic performance of researchers，provides a good reference for scientific research evaluation and the formulation of scientific research policies。November 26，Norway Nordic Innovation、Research and Education Institute Professor Liv Langfeldt and others on the official website of the School of Political Economics, UK,，In the process of scientific evaluation and other scientific evaluation process of peer evaluation and academic decision -making，Academic indicators are an influencing factor that continues to play an important role。

　　bet365 Play online games

Diverse types of academic indicators，Langfield and others summarized three main academic indicators based on publications: productivity/publication quantity、Scientific influence/quantity amount、Periodical influence factor。First，Number of publications is the most basic indicator，It is usually regarded as an indirect measurement standard for knowledge production。Next，Reference volume is one of the components of the concept of scientific research，Usually used as a criteria for judging the influence。Last，Periodical impact factor is an important part of the literature metering indicator，It is usually regarded as an indicator of the importance and reputation of the journal。

Academic indicators are also considered a representative of the quality of scientific research，Perspective reviewers are more inclined to make evaluations on the basis Bet365 app download of existing academic indicators。Hu Jian, a researcher at the Soft Power Research Center of the Shanghai Institute of Social Sciences, said in an interview with our reporter，When the academic achievements of scholars were included in the evaluation system for some reason，They all hope to have objective standards。Although the importance of the academic community evaluation for a long time，But if the evaluation of the academic community does not have any objective standards，Then the true objectivity of evaluation will inevitably be covered by subjective cognition，Therefore, there are various disputes among those with different evaluations。For example，During the doctoral dissertation defense process，Different defense committees experts on the academic level of the same paper may have many differences，The reason is that the doctoral dissertation defense does not have specific objective evaluation standards，Experts of the defense committee make judgments with their professional vision and academic experience，Different scholars will undoubtedly be affected by the knowledge of the specific research field。The thesis defense is still a process of academic discussion，and evaluate the published papers and published works and journals，is a process of using academic wares，This requires that evaluator except for subjective responsibility for academic responsibility，It is necessary to have an objective academic indicator as the evaluation basis。

Now in scientific research evaluation，Government、Research Organization、Funding agencies, etc., will rely on scholars' peer reviews。In the study by Lang Felt and others，The concept of peer reviews is wider，Covering the scientific research funding plan review、Recruitment of academic positions。but，The process of peer review will also rely on indicators such as publications and its reference volume，For example，When applying for scientific research funding，Applicants need to submit standardized bet365 Play online games resumes including the number of thesis references。

　　Avoid the "one -size -fits -all" mode

Pass review is not based on academic indicators，Instead, based on the professional knowledge of peers and their understanding of scientific research。In order to better understand the role of academic indicators in peer review，Land Fern and others passed the data survey，Research Dutch、The views and practice of researchers in different academic fields in three countries in Norway and Sweden。Most respondents said，When they need to choose the best scientific research funding plan or candidate for the academic committee，Academic indicators are indeed an important consideration，Especially "Reference Impact of Past Publications" and "Productivity/Number of Publications"。But the use of academic indicators has always been controversial。Senior Researcher at Norway Social Research Institute Ingvild Reymert said，One aspect，Introduction indicators may motivate research institutions and funded organizations。At the organization level，The indicator provides a lot of information that is easy to obtain，This kind of information has the characteristics of high correlation and fairness，It is possible to reduce prejudice in peer review，Therefore, it is encouraged by the government。On the other hand，At present, there are many phenomena abuse of indicators，Many potential negative effects on the scientific research system。

Scholars in different fields have different views on the use of academic indicators。Norway Nordic Innovation、Research and Education Institute professor Dag W.aksnes (Dag W.aksnes) believes，There are different views on the use of academic indicators for reviewers，May affect their evaluation process。When serving as a reviewer，Scholars have a great free tailoring right，They can choose to use or not use the indicator，ignore the overall guidance policy。So，The results of the evaluation may be different due to the different personal bet365 live casino games preferences of the indicators in the group members。Research indicates，The emphasis on academic indicators is positively related to the interviewee's literature measurement performance。When selecting candidates for academic positions and evaluating scientific research funding proposals，The reviewers with a high number of literary measurements pay more attention to academic indicators。Although in natural science and medical science，The use of literature measurement indicators is more common than in humanities and social sciences，But in the field of humanities and social sciences，Researchers in their resume、Displaying various academic indicators in the application and funding application is a common practice。

But，When standardization is regarded as the highest criterion，It is inevitable that there will be a "one -size -fits -all" situation。Hu Jian said，Some unpopular disciplines、Active has a unique personality，If you copy the influencing factor、Quoted half -life、Reprinting rate these indicators for evaluation，It may cause unpopular disciplines、Journal atrophy of the Journal of Primary School，The academic space of related scholars is further squeezed，Even losing academic platform。So，The use of evaluation indicators should observe such journals and so on、Scholars' personality and uniqueness，Avoid the management mode of "one knife and cut"。

Use of academic indicators，Also pay attention to the difference between professional journals and comprehensive journals。Hu Jian Explanation Road，Generally speaking，Professional journals are more popular in the academic community，Scholars are also inclined to invest in their best thesis to professional journals，Therefore, the influence factor of professional journals、Quoted half -life、Reprint rates and other indicators are relatively high。Comparison of comparison，High administrative status of comprehensive journals，But the academic influence bet365 live casino games is relatively weak。For a long time，The academic community does not have a good location for the positioning of these two journals，Therefore, scholars often contribute according to their familiarity with journals。The ancients said that the academic research has "subtle and vast"，Professional journals are in -depth excavation of specific issues，lies in "Filter"，and the comprehensive journal should not be a discipline platter，Instead of cross -disciplinary research on macro issues，This can produce academic theory、Big Thought，This reflects the importance of the comprehensive journal "to the majority"。In other words，Research on promoting interdisciplinary and disciplinary disciplines、Promoting macro theory innovation，Comprehensive journals have unique advantages，Professional journals cannot be compared in this regard。

　　The research direction of scholars

Is the criteria for research quality affected by academic indicators? research shows，Although the academic indicators affect the peer review process，But the reviewer can still be more reasonable to evaluate the potential impact of a high -quality research on the successful future of the person.。This evaluation of the reviewer is often more based on personal characteristics based on high -quality research，Not just based on literature measurement performance。Few respondents believe that the quantity or the impact factor of the journal is the only indicator for evaluating the quality of the research，So，Quantitative academic indicators are not the decisive factor that determines the quality of research。

In peer review，Emphasizing that academic indicators may affect research activities and research agenda。Axnes said，Number of publications and scientific influence are widely used in academic circles，Most scholars have believed in the evaluation process of academic journals and publishers in their fields，Edit and reviewer of the main journals is highly recognized。So，These Bet365 lotto review editors and reviewers are not only in scientific research and publication，Also in academic positions and scientific research funding has a great right to speak in terms of corporation。

Start from the individual level，Researchers, especially those in the early career,，What research needs to be considered more helpful for them to get funding and position。From the view of Lang Felt，If you pay too much attention to the academic indicators of the person who can be quantified，instead of its professional ability and future potential，Then the reviewer may only be based on past experience，Come to plan the future research direction，This leads to those easy to publish、The topic of high reference volume is easier to get a lot of resources。In order to be easier to succeed in scientific research funding and academic positions，Young scholars will engage in research that looks more "insurance" in terms of publishing and references。

Hu Jian said，In existing academic indicators，The most important thing is the impact factor，It can be used to evaluate the influence of papers and journals，It also represents the academic level to a certain extent。Impact factor was founded in the 1960s，refers to the frequency of the article of a certain journal in a specific year or period，It is an important indicator for measuring the influence of academic journals。Impact factor has been used as the most important indicator for evaluating journal papers for a long time，Later, the academic community also used it to evaluate the academic influence of a scholar。Same，Journal is also used to evaluate the academic influence of journal papers and scholars。but but，Domestic academic evaluation institutions in China have paid more and more attention to the indicator of reprint rate，How many articles have been reprinted by the second documentation institution，How many articles did scholars reprint in the year，This indicator has gradually risen into a key indicator of academic evaluation。Of course，Use Bet365 app download these indicators scientifically and reasonably，It is very important to perform academic evaluation objectively and effectively。

No matter how the evaluation indicators，The ultimate goal is under the premise of maintaining academic norms，Effectively promote academic research and development。Good academic journal and scientific research results evaluation mechanism is an important vane for promoting knowledge production and academic innovation development，Journal industry、Professional evaluation agencies and academic circles should work together，Push the improvement of scientific research evaluation mechanisms together，Promoting academic progress。