bet365 best casino games April 22，Richard UTZ, deputy dean of the Institute of Georgia Institute of Technology in the Institute of Georgia University of Science and Technology，American scholars should treat lifetime teaching review work with a more serious and responsible attitude。

In recent years，Discussions on the lifelong teaching system often appear in the American academic community。Supporters think，Lifetime faculty is academic freedom、An important guarantee for knowledge production and dissemination; opponents think，Lifetime faculty bet365 best casino games to give academic personnel too much right，Obstacles innovation and progress。In view of the significance of the lifelong faculty to academic personnel and their work，Uz thinks，Scholars who undertake the task of review must perform their duties seriously。

American Lifetime Faculty Review mainly inspect the applicant's performance in three aspects: scientific research、Teaching、School service。The materials that applicants need to prepare include: personal resume、Published scientific research results、Teaching and service experience、Awards and funding obtained、Personal statement (outline your professional resume and highlight key results)。The review committee will invite 5-10 applicants in the field of subjects bet365 Play online games in the field of disciplines to evaluate the applicant's academic contribution and influence，and submit it to the leaders and school leaders of the department where the applicant belongs after receiving the feedback。

Uz has been the head of the three US public universities、The person in charge of the Title Review Committee，Also worked as an external judge。According to his observation，At about 1/3 of the time，Lifetime faculty review process does not strictly abide by relevant regulations。Because trust applicants or to save time，Judges often omit independent evaluation links，Write evaluation opinions directly according to the content of the applicant's self -described or information on the Internet，Even when the source is not indicated, the self -assessment bet365 best casino games of the applicant is inserted in large sections。In an extreme case，A judge completely copied the publicity text of the publisher's monograph on the applicant in the recommendation letter。This is probably equivalent to quoting the applicant's own words -Publishing House often allows the author to draft a new book introduction。

And，Many external review opinions are only "recommended" without "evaluation"，This will weaken the rigor and value of the results of the review。There are also some external judges who have not disclosed conflicts of interest，Its opinion cannot be adopted。A applicant has published a positive evaluation of a new book on an external judge，But I did not include this comment to my own work list，The judge did not mention this in the review opinion。This is Bet365 lotto review difficult to question the fairness of the relationship between the two and the opinions of the review。other，Internal and external judges tend to judge the applicant's scientific research results based on the popularity of academic journals，But the published research is exposed to scandals involving academic dislocation behavior. It is not uncommon for。

Uz said，Questions that occur in the review of lifelong faculty，It has caused the public to question the ability of academic self -governance。To ensure the effective player of the lifelong teaching system，The judge must strictly check，Each application based on the highest standard。

　　(Wang Youran/Compilation)