Critical Cognitive Linguistics, also known as Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Studies, also known as Cognitive Linguistic，CL-CDS)。Follow words、Interactive relationship between cognitive and society，It is a multi -disciplinary cross -research field that has emerged in the past ten years。The increasingly increasing research indicates，Critical Cognitive Linguistics has taken shape，received in the UK、United States、A lot of attention from scholars such as Europe and China，The momentum of development cannot be underestimated。

　　bet365 best casino games

Critical Cognitive Linguistics，As the name suggests，It's criticizing discourse analysis，or the cross -fusion of criticism research and cognitive linguistics in a more extensive sense。This fusion can be traced back to two aspects: criticism of discourse analysis scholars' criticism of traditional research，and cognitive linguist's attention to the increase in social factors of language use。In this process，Scholars who have a greater impact include T. A. Van Dijk、H. G. Widdowson、K. O’Halloran、P. Chilton、Lakoff (G. Lakoff)、Charrteris-Black、Hart (C. Hart)、Kap (P. CAP), etc.。but，The way they criticize and criticize discourse analysis are single，Research vision is relatively narrow，Conclusion The subjective color is heavier，Of course they also try to introduce a new research perspective、Research methods and research tools。Van Dike introduced the concept of cognition into an ideological analysis in 1998; Ledov used its cognitive metaphor theory in 1996，Analysis of the cognitive foundation of the Republican Party and Democratic Party's political discourse; in 2005, Chilton proposed that cognition bet365 live casino games was a chain that criticized the discourse analysis，Based on this, the theory of discourse space was constructed; Hart proposed the term of criticism of cognitive linguistics in 2013，and gradually introduce psychological research paradigm，"Experimental Steering" of Critical Cognitive Linguistics。

The compatibility of criticism of the theoretical views of cognitive linguistics originated from the essential characteristics of its interdisciplinary。Cognitive linguistics research began in the 1970s，Formed in the early 1990s，It is a kind of "movement" or "method" from a cognitive perspective to study the language。The main features of cognitive linguistics are reflected in the five theoretical assumptions，Is a body cognition、Encyclopedia full -book semantics、meaning is conceptualization、symbolic assumptions and use -based assumptions。The basic point of these assumptions is: most concept systems that language relies on our body and the interaction between our body and the physical world，or the experience we get in observation。In discourse，Vocabulary and structure as a prompt can evoke a series of concept structures，Background knowledge that is collected and stored in long -term memory，So as to produce a psychological representation of sharing between subjects。

Critical discourse analysis mainly focuses on the relationship between language and society。Critical discourse analysis does not criticize other theories and methods of discourse analysis，Instead of criticizing social relations through discourse construction。The purpose of criticism of discourse analysis is to discover the attributes of problems in discourse practice。So，Critical discourse analysis is essentially language、A shared angle of symbols and discourse analysis。

Integration of two research areas，Research on Critical Cognitive Linguistics involves the dominance hidden in language、Discrimination、Structural relationship between power and control，bet365 live casino games Discuss the language as a symbol、Conceptualization、The symbol of the body's symbols in the discourse and function。A word to cover it，Critical Cognitive Linguistics Explore the process of cognition，and the role of these cognition -symbols in the process of building the legalization of knowledge and behavior。but，Different from other criticism discourse research (except Van Dak's research)，Criticism Cognitive Linguistics Emphasize the Concepts of Concept Construction，Pay attention to the concept structure of the use of words and the associated associated by it，and further extend to the ideology or legalization of these conceptual structures in the discourse context。Its ultimate purpose is to simulate the conceptualization of specific language usage，To reveal these conceptual ideology and the potential of (non -) legalization。The rise of criticism of cognitive linguistics on the one hand reflects the "social steering" of cognitive linguistics research，On the other hand, it also reflects the "cognitive steering" of criticism research。

　Research perspective has diversity

The diversity of the perspective of criticism of cognitive linguistics is mainly reflected in the research object、Theoretical basis、Diversity of perspectives。First，Critical Cognitive Linguistics Broken Critical discourse analysis of the attention of political discourse，Extend the research object to environmental discourse、Disease discourse、Corporate discourse、Diversified discourse categories such as crisis discourse。

Second，Various perspectives and theories of cognitive linguistics research provides a set of "tools" for criticism analysis，Theory as shown in Figure、Psychological space、Concept metaphorical theory、Chapter World Theory、Cognitive grammar，and cognitive poetics and other theories and concepts。These single tools，or several combinations，can be a research perspective。

again，The perspective of criticism of cognitive linguistics includes both Bet365 app download language output，It also advocates language understanding and acceptance。Traditional criticism discourse research，Including early criticism of cognitive linguistics，Most of the perspectives based on language -based output，How to construct discourages to emphasize words、How to realize the expected cognition。This has largely ignored the degree of perception and acceptance of discourse consumers。Studies in recent years indicate，Critical Cognitive Linguistics is no longer restricted by the perspective of language output，Based on the quality analysis of discourse construction strategy，Study the cognitive laws of readers and the impact of their cognitive laws when understanding and receiving discourse，Explore the "interpretative diversity" problem that lacks the lack of "interpretation" in criticism analysis。Although there are few studies starting from this perspective，But it is not difficult to see，The understanding and acceptance of discourse has become a vane of criticism of cognitive linguistics research。This is not only the results of the long -term criticism of scholars' criticisms，It is also a response to the call of mutual evidence research methods，Another side of criticism analysis of this coin cannot be ignored。

　　The research method is mutually evidence

Critical Cognitive Linguistics advocates the use of triangular measurement，Emphasize the use of multiple methods in analysis，Multi -party verification of the results through the evidence of exchange flow。Triangle measurement makes analysis and interpretation more objective、Reasonable。Mutual research methods for criticism of cognitive linguistics mainly include corpus auxiliary analysis、National Chronicle、Questionnaire survey, etc.。

where，The corpus is an empirical method that introduces criticism of cognitive linguistics earlier，The research field is mainly criticizing the metaphor analysis。"Mipvu" (MIPVU) and "Metaphor Scenario Analysis" is an important result of this research。Another，bet365 best casino games Combining the theory of approaching the theory of the theory of the corpus and discourse space theory，Research discounted cognitive words for rhetoric effect，Also received more attention。Critical discourse research of existing national methods，It is mainly concentrated in the ideological processes of language control and discourse output of the news discourse agency。

Questionnaire survey belongs to psychology experimental paradigm，In the criticism of the perspective of language understanding and acceptance in criticism of cognitive linguistics。The main research in this area is mainly British scholar Hart。Although this kind of research can be a few，However, it provides a way to enter the triangle interoperability paradigm of criticism of cognitive linguistics。

　　The development trend is expandable

Critical Cognitive Linguistics is an emerging multidisciplinary cross -research field，So，During the gradual improvement and development process，The research trend has obvious expansion。The type of discourse that currently criticized cognitive linguistics research is mainly news and discourse、Political discourse、Institutional discourse、Environmental discourse, etc.，With the integration of cognitive linguistics and literary research，One of the founders of cognitive poetry, the concepts such as "texture" and "resonance" proposed by P. Stockwell.，It also provides a new interpretation perspective and theoretical support for the reader of the discourse。So，It can be predicted is，The ideological and social cognitive model hidden in literary text，Especially literary texts that reflect inequality and discrimination，It will also naturally enter the research territory of criticism of cognitive linguistics。

Another，Research on the Rich Cognitive Linguistics，such as eye movement、ECG、Application of online language processing monitoring tools such as multi -function near infrared spectrometer，It will also benefit the online processing mechanism of cognitive linguistics bet365 Play online games dialogue, philosophy, awareness and response。This will definite。The latter is also the echo of the "mixed mind" emphasized by the third cognitive science wave。American philosopher M. Rowlands (M. Rowlands) in The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology, it is pointed out，"Mixed mind" means that human mind is the brain、Mixed (amalgamated) product of the body and environment。This research on criticism of cognitive linguistics can be used by psychology and neuroscience，Expand to human cognition、Thinking、Interactive relationship between emotion and social institutions and social systems。At the same time，In terms of research methods，The latest research indicates，Using the analysis framework reflected by the reader，Through the sound method、Inner Provincial Word Report、Eye movement and other psychological research paradigm exams the language induced in the environment，Discuss the perception of the reader's credibility (ethos)，The interpretation process of the logic (logos) and the emotion (Pathos) that listened to the reader in the discourse understanding，It will be able to improve the level of criticism of "triangle demonstration"。

It is worth noting is，Localization research will also enter the perspective of criticism of cognitive linguistics。The current number of related empirical and experimental research is small，The discourse classics are almost all Indo -European language system，A small amount of study involving the discourse involved in the same incident。Critical Cognitive Linguistics Research in Chinese Dialogue，Localization research will increase "Chinese Voice" in criticizing the cognitive linguistics community，At the same time, it will also contribute to the development of the entire research field。

　(This article is the Jiangsu University of Philosophy and Social Science Research Fund Project "Research on the U.S. Think Tank Discourse under the Visarcation of the U.S. Think Tank" (2017sjb2051)

(Author Unit: School of Foreign Languages ​​from Nanjing Normal University)