Mircea Eliade is both a generation of religious history，I am a famous mythology and writer，Its academic influence is extended to contemporary religion、Anthropology、Anthropology、Folklore、Literature and Art and other people in the literary field，Can be described as deep and wide。The "The Eliadean Ela" (The Eliadean Ela), known as the research of religion in the 1960s and 1970s，The Chicago School, led by Iliade, once dominated by North American religion，and form a strong counter -counter with traditional European colleagues。But，Iliad died shortly，That is, there is an industry scholar announced "the end of the Iliad era"，Roger Corless (Roger Corless) and even asserted that Iliad's life was "a failure ... a strong and valuable failure"。In fact，Due to the academic research of Iliad across many fields，As early as its reputation, the 1960s of the 1960s，Some scholars from various disciplines have begun to target their academic thoughts、Research Paradigm、Material use and even the early years of political experience proposed a series of criticisms。Where，Criticism from the human academic community is particularly attractive。Reasons for the reason，Iliad tried to "build a bridge between the communication between anthropology and religious history"，The entire academic career has always occurred with modern anthropology.。This kind of entanglement also characterizes the intricate association between the two disciplines of religious history and anthropology for more than 100 years。

Since the 21st century，With the prominent problem of the "Civilized Conflict" problem，Religious issues have once again become the so -called "secular era" people's important attention。But from the perspective of cross -border academic research，After the World of Iliads,，Dialogue bet365 Play online games between religious history and anthropology does not seem to have achieved much substantial progress，Scholars of a master or a classic writer is rare。Very true，Religious historians are still absorbing anthropologists' survey、Research results，Humanologists are still paying attention to religious issues，Religious anthropology as a subject is booming。But after experiencing the long -term review of the Irada research paradigm in the academic community，The professionalism of today's religious historians、Scientific、The consciousness of the discipline boundary and other aspects is increasingly strengthened，They obviously have more caution when they absorb the results of anthropology，In theoretical integration、Method Theory exploration also has a lot of more stubbornness。What about anthropologists engaged in religious research? From entering the "Third Era of the Development of the National Chronicle",，Some adhere to post -modern anti -essentialism、Anti -authority、Decentralization and other principles，Abandoning the ideal of classical anthropologists，Concentrated on "local truth"，Reject "Great narrative" of any form; some are practical、Application -oriented situation，More and more immersed in the description and research of specific cases，I also gave up refining、Summary "ambition" of the same theory of religion。So this situation appeared: About all over the world、The national volunteer materials of the religious affairs of each ethnic group increased to double the growth，Large -scale synthesis of these materials、Explanation、summary、Summary attempts are becoming more and more rare。"What is the essence of religion", "What is the origin of religion", "What is the meaning of religion" and other，Any issue that is separated from the specific social and historical situation seems to have reached the vision of contemporary religious history and anthropology，and they are exactly the common attention of the early pioneers of these two disciplines。

bet365 live casino games Someone once used Ilia Derby as contemporary James G. Frazer，Some people say that Iliad is "Following the most famous religious historian of the twentieth century after the 20th century"。If Fraser is classical anthropology、Masters of traditional religious history，Then Iliad may be the absolute sound of the ideal of traditional religious history，The distance of its huge figure does indicate the end of a era。

But is the "Iliad era" really ended? Daniel L. PALS, a famous religious theorist, once regarded Iliad's religious theory as one of the most influential "seven religious theories" in the contemporary era。He said: "Explanation does not require correctly to be valuable。Religion is the same as other fields，An inspiration and original theory even if it fails，It can also stimulate new research or reconstruction issues to bring new understanding of more results。"" This judgment is placed on Iliad, but it is appropriate。In fact，Since Illiard has caused various controversy，Although he himself has never made any response，But the scholars who defended Iliade are here。Where，Both from the religious community，There are also from the human academy;、The research method，It also has its cultural position and early political experience。Roughly speaking，Iliad's great achievements and cultural impacts of the entire religious study cannot be ignored; although his entire religious history research model does have various loopholes or limitations，But the issue of the times conveyed by this model、Humanities Ideal、Cultural ideas, etc., can form a lot of response with the various trends of thoughts of postmodernism，Religious research on all angles (including anthropology) in the future、Humanities Research、Cross -cultural dialogue, etc., all have important reference meaning。

Taking methodology as an example，The reason why Koris believes that Iliad’s "failure" is valuable，It is because Iliad provides a pre -example of failure for religion's exploration。In his opinion，Iliad Exploring bet365 Play online games the "Religiosity" business of religion as religion is like the end of the 19th century Albert Michelson and Edward Williams Morley to find Ether (Ether) Road，3258_3271。But as they opened a road for future generations to discover the phenomenon of electromagnetic wave radiation phenomenon (Electro-Magnetic Radiation)，Iliad has popularized many religious knowledge for future generations，enable people to ask a new question about religion。It seems to another religious scholar Carl Olson，Koris's assertion is extremely arbitrary。He pointed out on the basis of reviewing the "comparative method" use of religious historical circles for more than a hundred years，Compared with Edward B. Tylor、Fraser、Lucien Levy-Bruhl and other anthropologists，Emile Durkeim、Max Weber、Joachim Wach (Joachim Wach) and other sociologists，Iliad's use of comparative methods injects morphology、History、Phenomenology、Interpretation and other spirit，Compared with most academic predecessors, it reflects an important progress。For application value,，In recent years, there have been many people in the field of humanities in various disciplines in the field of humanities.。As for the cultural significance of Iliad，Senior Research Expert Douglas Allen pointed out，Although Iliad sometimes exaggerates the predecessor、Value of religious culture，Ignoring the huge achievements of modern civilization，But he did not call for modern people to return to the predecessor's survival state;、Contemporary people who urgently need cultural renewal，His phenomenology and "New Humanism" concept to the key。

Iliad's influence on the current and future anthropology is a weak link in the current research。No doubt，Anthropology in the past few decades has changed dramatically compared to Iliad on the world，But as Mihala Gligor said，"Even those religious historians who criticize Iliad's works、Anthropologists and sociologists，Many of them now also use Iliad's religious historical works as the starting bet365 best casino games point of their own analysis "。Just read the currently influential religious anthropology theory works、Textbook、Reading or involving religion、Myth、Ceremony、symbol、Research on Anthropology in the fields of memory，I will find that Iliad is a scholar who is difficult to bypass，Many terms (such as "sacred space", "sacred time", "mythical prototype", "out of God", etc.) have long become an important concept tool for anthropologists to analyze the phenomenon。It can be said，"Religious Anthropologist" is another important identity of Iliad。That's why，If contemporary anthropology in the past few decades has challenged the theory and method of Iliad，So this challenge may not be one -way: in the process of constructing its own religious history theoretical system，Iliad is integrated by anthropological related materials、Critical absorption of anthropological methods、Reflection on religious anthropology traditions，Also challenged the theoretical and research paradigm of anthropology，Some of its academic character also penetrated into the texture of contemporary anthropology。

So，Contemporary anthropologists may need to be like the current religious scholar，Critical、At the same time, I turned back to reflect on: What kind of legacy did Ilyd leave for future generations? How can he become a starting point for people to think about new problems?，At present, Iliad's article discussed from the perspective of anthropology is almost limited to the following three categories: one is that religious anthropologists with field survey experience have criticized some specific theoretical issues of Iliad from a professional perspective; the other is religious scholars Relying on the theoretical and practical achievements of anthropology to join the critical camp; the third is that religious scholars respond or defend the two types of criticisms in the aforementioned types。Discuss Iliad from the perspective of discipline dialogue、The writing of the relationship bet365 Play online games between religious history and bet365 live casino games modern anthropology is still rare，Nothing on the general dialogue between the two disciplines of religious history and anthropology。

Wish to know，Anthropology Development has so far，Has been out of the early rocking chair anthropologists from the field、Research mode that pays attention to theoretical category，Become an experimental、Discipline with strong practicality，But this does not mean that the experiment or practice of anthropology no longer requires the guidance of theory。Standards from the theory，The cultural facts surveyed from the field are finally a plate of loose sand，It is difficult to sublimate general understanding，It is also difficult to promote the sustainable development and popularization of anthropology。Just as E. E. Evans-Pritchard) commented more than half a century ago、Robert Hertz、Levi-Buruer and other French sociologists in French sociologists pointed out: an irrefutable fact is，The theoretical foundation of today's anthropologists is mostly composed of the works of these scholars engaged in document research。Although these scholars did not get out of the book，But they use their extraordinary abilities、Guangbo's knowledge and rigorous academic methods，Research on the facts observed and recorded by others。Once this foundation collapses，We will be caught in a simple quagmire of empiricalism，One field after another will only increase the number of known things，However, because of the lack of creativity, it cannot have a profound impact on future generations。

In this sense，For religious history or religious anthropology，Illiard may not be over time。In terms of religious anthropology，If the problems such as "what is religion" or "religion is" cannot reach a general consensus，Dialogue between peers or interdisciplinary，I am afraid that even anthropologists can not start when they face complicated and complicated religious phenomena。In short，What are the base points of the dialogue between religious anthropology and religious history? bet365 best casino games Is the "religion" that anthropologists understand and the "religion" understanding by religious historians?，So whether anthropologists are accusing religious historians，Or religious historians criticize religious anthropologists，Disted phenomena may occur。To avoid misplaced dialogue，Make the conversation between the dialogue -oriented discipline、Mutual Learning、mutual benefit，Perhaps it is necessary to temporarily suspend the unhelpful entanglement of the "Iliad Times" for the end，Repeatedly returned to the original starting point of these two disciplines，This is also the starting point of constantly returning to Iliad thought and academic。

　　bet365 Play online games

(Author is an associate professor at the School of Arts of Yunnan University)