A famous debate between the ancient Greek Stockus School and the Ishuiru School: If the universe is full of causal chains determined by the inevitable fate,So can people choose freely? Studor School thinks,There is no such thing as an accidental,The process of nature is strictly determined by the natural law firm; under the inevitable law of the law,Humans cannot talk about free will。Ibhamu Lux School thinks,Atoms that do vertical whereabouts in the void,Polarized movement will occur when encountering obstacles。The foundation of the free will is in the accidental state of this atomic movement。Visible,The two parties who controversy are opposite to the specific point of view,However, it is determined that the causal chain can generate a negative role of the freedom of people。Freedom and inevitable dual opposition structure in the Western philosophy tradition is established like this。Oedipus tragedy is therefore as a classic case,It is often used by people to prove that "decision theory is bound to deny the will of freedom"。But it's a pity,This is a misunderstanding of untenable。
Look from the storyline,Odipus is undoubtedly a free will,and this freedom will also come from the advanced cause and effect chain: he learned from the gods,Zeus sets the cruel destiny that he bet365 best casino games will marry his father to marry his mother for various reasons,So try to escape。In other words,Explanation of the opposition between duals,His free will is not generated out of thin air,Instead, there is a very clear front cause and consequences。Good,Oedipus's efforts to resist fate failed,But like the failure we have experienced,This ending is not enough to deny the fact that he has free will,On the contrary, the premise of this fact: If he did not have the free will to resist destiny,Where can I talk about failure? How can it constitute a tragedy of "destroying things with valuable life"?,The most valuable thing in the whole story,It is not his own knowing fate、It is difficult to reverse,Still firm willingness to resolutely refuse to succeed? so,Instead of the tragedy of Oedipus, the tragedy of Oedipus proves that the free will facing the decision theory,It is better to say that it shows the tragic and lofty of the freedom of losing the honor。
So,How to explain the fact that Oedipus's free will was eventually destroyed by fate? This requires the two layers of different meanings to return to the concept of "inevitable": if the meaning of "inevitable" meaning must be interrelated between various facts,So the meaning of "irresistible" means that it means that the state of good and evil values has such a good and evil value effect on people's realization of will。So,"Destiny" is further divided into "good luck (lucky)" and bet365 best casino games "bad luck)" in daily talks。Oedipus encounters a doom that cannot be reversed,Therefore, his efforts are irreparable to one defeat。There are similar phenomena in reality,The "force majeure" clauses common in commercial insurance contracts,I witnessed the cruel side of life。Freedom and inevitable binary confrontation architecture is grasping this side rendering,But it was twisted again: even in this case,The inevitable destiny is just to make the free will not be realized in the value of the value of sexual demand,No (impossible) to make free will into nothingness in the dimension dimension dimension of the actual existence。In other words,Not both the truth is actually the fact that "inevitable doom determines the failure of freedom will fail",Stealing into the imagination of "cause and effect must determine the free will of freedom"。
Not only that,Freedom and inevitable binary confrontation architecture also ignored the other side of the matter: life is eliminated when you have touched the mildew that you drink cold water,Good luck that can also be hit by the door panel,As a result, the free will。This indicates: the opposite of Western philosophical claims,A inevitable destiny will not only kill the free will,Instead, it is possible to reverse the will of freedom,This completely depends on their good and evil attributes to people。For example,"The world trend is mighty,Shunzhong,The death of the inverse "is nothing bet365 live casino games more than saying: If the free will conforms to the mighty world trend,It can be achieved smoothly because of this inevitable trend; if the free will deviates from the mighty world trend,Facing this inevitable trend, it will be disappeared。
Look further,"Occasionally" will also be because of its own or good or bad value attributes,Either affirmation of people’s free will、Either the dual effect of negative。In fact,If the English "Fate" and "LUCK" in English are emphasized than to separate from accidents,So,"Destiny" in Chinese can be said to be the "destiny" of the inevitable "destiny" and the accidental "transportation",Once again, the unreliable binary opposition framework。Just like the "fate" that is inevitable for the cause and effect, it may not necessarily stop the realization of the free will,Random "luck" may not necessarily provide open space for free will,Because a big tree that happens to fall,It is enough to destroy someone who wants to survive。So,Whether success or failure,The decisive affects the free will,Not the inevitable and accidental emphasis on the Western academic community,but the value content of good and evil, good and bad: good factors always help free will,There are no exceptions; bad and evil factors are always due to free will,No suspense。
Of course,The absurdity of the binary opposition architecture does not stop here。I am rather,The most wrong thing about it is to mix the two meanings of the inevitable concept Bet365 lotto review into a talk,No see free will not only always be rooted in all kinds of causal chains,and always obey the human nature logic as if it is to tend to avoid evil,On the contrary, just rely on the inevitable doom that cannot be blocked hindered the one -sided reason for free will,Just asserting the inevitable causal chain is destined to let the free will to save the body。Unfortunate is,The confusion in this concept further induced the error that equates "decision theory" and "fate theory" as one,If the so -called Laplaz decision theory, it advocates that the complete information of the universe at a certain moment can inevitably determine its state of existence at any other moment; so,Although we can accurately predict the future development trend in the future,But there is no way to this,I can only reluctant to listen to it by myself。This statement is obviously the inevitable causal chain that was originally the inevitable causal chain of cognitive dimension as an inevitable fate for the unchangedness of will。Only clarify the similarities and similarities of the meaning of the inevitable concept,We can refute this ridiculous concept: If you have the relevant information,When we describe the development of the previous universe (including human behavior),Of course, it can be determined to explain that there must,But this does not mean that we have no power to develop such a change in the future of the universe。On the contrary,We can conduct effective intervention bet365 Play online games based on free will,The cause and effect chain that is originally like this will be changed into the cause and effect chain that is like that.。
Binary opposition architecture is actually a typical grasp of the rest of the rest: it takes the inevitable doom that is inevitable and irresistible,and the "Failure to Failure" is interpreted as "no existence",As a result, not only ignores the inevitable good luck that can help the positive effect of free will,And ignoring the random occasion that it will also be caused by its own good and evil attributes or promotion、or the dual effects that hinder the free will,Finally, the inevitable causality on the cognitive level must be mixed with the inevitable fate of irresistible aspects of will,Therefore, it can be said that it is full of loopholes。What surprised is,Good at concept definition,even developed a western academic community that analyzed philosophy,I didn’t realize the tangling meaning of the inevitable concept,The quagmire that has always been indulged in freedom and inevitable potential。No need to talk about,The lesson is worthy of our reflection: Is there any other philosophical concepts that have been distorted by similar,and caused misunderstandings of other philosophical problems?
bet365 Play online games
Friendship link: Official Website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |
Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869
All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission
General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026
>