Painting as an art form，Does it have its unique aesthetic value? Many people will give a positive response to this: painting can depict the situation、Happy A sense、Expressing Emotion、Communication Thought，Of course has unique aesthetic value。but，The above value is not unique to painting，Other art forms also have this value。According to traditional art definitions，A certain thing becomes an art work，It is because it has some inherent aesthetic nature。The unique way of presenting this inner aesthetic nature in painting，It constitutes the sign of painting as an art that is different from other arts。So，Can the uniqueness of painting really explain its aesthetic value?

"Art is imitation" as an art definition that was once widely recognized，It is now contempt from many art theorists。but，"Improvement is the unique feature of painting" is still an easy -going point of view。This view is considered，Painting Especially the reason for fixing paintings can cause people's interest is，Painting is a scene of real life，This reproduction makes people feel happy because it is similar to the real scene。This imitation or reproduction can further extend from real scenes to fantasy scenes，Those paintings depicting myths or religious stories during the Renaissance，is the imitation of the fantasy world。Of course，Other art forms can also imitate a certain situation，But only the painting makes people see the object or scene directly，Instantly inspire visual pleasure。

bet365 Play online games According to the perspective of imitation theory，The aesthetic value of a painting is derived from its "drawn thing"。What needs to be pointed out is，"The described things" does not refer to the theme of painting，but refers to the content of painting。The theme is the object represented by painting，It is often used as the title of painting works; the content is the painting itself created by the artist，The same theme can be expressed with different content。For example，The title "Last Dinner" is also the title，Da Vinci and Wellnesse showed a completely different painting content。The perspective with Plato is the opposite of imitation theory.，supporters of imitations such as Leding and other imitations attribute the aesthetic value of painting to the theme in different ways，Think that "only painting can present an objective existence beauty"。further，The theory of imitations，Painting not only performs objects，and can attract the experience of the subject about the object of the performance。Does this experience have aesthetic characteristics，It is determined by the content of the painting，Only correctly understand the content of a painting，Only to bring people aesthetic experience。

The theory of imitation although the value of painting is explained within a certain range，But its problem is also obvious: on the one hand, painting is obviously not the only imitation art，Other art forms also have the characteristics of imitation; on the other hand，The value of imitation cannot explain the abstract painting。So，Clav Bell and Roger Fry support the use of formalism to explain the value of painting。They distinguish the "Bet365 app download plasticity form" of painting and "explanatory content": "plasticity form" includes lines、shape、Color and the relationship between them。"Explanation content" refers to the scene depicted by painting、Action、Metaphor or meaning of painting。Bell pushes the perspective of formalism to the extreme，The uniqueness he thinks is not the content，and in the form。When the form is "intentional"，It will allow admirers to experience a aesthetic emotion different from daily life，It is this aesthetic emotion that makes painting with unique aesthetic value。So，Although every art form has form attributes，But the aesthetic value of painting lies in its unique lines、Color、Plane and other attributes and unique aesthetic emotions from this。

but，As Bell's own recognition，Aesthetic emotion is essentially a mysterious thing，Therefore, it is difficult to guarantee that it must be caused by form。More importantly，There are too many counter -examples (almost all similar paintings) can prove that the value of painting completely attributes the value of painting to plasticity is difficult。In order to make up for the shortcomings of Bell's formalism completely rejecting content，Fle emphasizes a "weak formalism" of a form and content independent。In his opinion，Plasticity form and explanatory content are independent of each other，The same form can show a variety of things，A variety of forms can also express the same thing。Based on different creative purposes，It can distinguish between two kinds of painting art: explanatory painting and formal painting，Both have independent value，There is an inevitable conflict on their experience。The reason why a painting Bet365 lotto review brings us aesthetic experience，or because of the form of form，or because of the content，But it is impossible to experience the two at the same time。If you want to experience the two，People must continue to switch between form and content。

But，Fle's point of view is also difficult: painters cannot distinguish form and content in advance，Take a certain aspect as the purpose。The content and form of painting are always unified，All forms of elements are adapted to each other under the drive of content，Establish a whole and gradually improve。In fact，The consistency of the implementation of form and content is the eternal goal pursued by the artists，An outstanding artistic work is a product of combining form and content。Even abstract paintings，If the form is separated from the ideological significance it conveyed，Its aesthetic value will also be greatly reduced。and，Many paintings can be appreciated only in the consistency of form and content，Those eliminated content、Thought、Pure forms of meaning cannot obtain emotional resonance of most people。

Whether it is imitation or formalism，Both the aesthetic value of painting is concentrated in one aspect and ignored other aspects。The former attaches importance to the content of painting，The latter follows the form of painting。but，Can we only think of the uniqueness of painting from one yuan? Or say further，When people appreciate a painting，Can you experience the content while experiencing the form? Gonbrech and Walheim are committed to defining the uniqueness and value of painting in the relationship between the two experiences。

Bigbuliho's point of view of Fry's inability to experience a painting bet365 Play online games form and content at the same time，But he believes that the value of painting does not only exist in one aspect，or the various experiences of painting do not have to conflict; on the contrary，People’s various experiences are parallel、Do not interfere with each other，The value of painting is existing in what people get in the conversion process of people。Here，Gentohi transformed the point of view of the value of painting value，The value of painting is attributed to two aspects: form and content，And think that these two values ​​can be promoted with each other -different forms of use can promote the deepening of the understanding of painting content，The awareness of the content of the painting will also enhance the form of expression。but，Gondo Bridge's point of view encountered the same problem as formalism: if the perception of formalism is not part of the content experience，Then the form and content of painting are always separated，and this separation does not meet the actual actual situation of most paintings。

Walheim made amendments to the theory of Gonbridhi，He believes that when people appreciate painting，The formal characteristics of painting are the meaning of the content of the content.，When people look at a image，Always see the pattern，At the same time, you can also see what is expressed in the pattern。Wallheim thinks，It is not possible to experience the bet365 Play online games form and content at the same time，Instead, you cannot experience two different forms or two different contents at the same time。In his opinion，The content of the painting always penetrates the painter's design (form)，So，Even the same scene，Drawing in painting bet365 live casino games is also different from real life。and，Fusion of form and content is a necessary condition for people to experience painting，Because it is the best explanation of our visual experience。When we look at a picture，No matter how you tilt，None of the type of twisted by the Law Institute of Optics，It seems that the brain will automatically correct our perception according to the location。If we do not experience form and content at the same time，The perception of the form will not penetrate into consciousness。I think，Walheim may overestimate the stimulation of the form of the brain，The receiving of the surface information of the brain does not indicate that the form has entered a conscious experience，This information may only make the brain correct the observation position but does not really enter the state of consciousness。Another，Anti -case of this view also exists in art，The most typical is minimalism abstract painting，When we appreciate, we only pay attention to their forms，Because these forms have no content。

Gonbrech and Walheim, although they started thinking about the value of painting from a variety of perspectives，But they still insist that painting has its own uniqueness。This makes them unable to explain all paintings and works like formalism。but，We cannot determine that painting is not worthy，This can only indicate that the value of painting is not a unique thing。Based on their theory，We can expand my vision，The relationship between the uniqueness of the painting and its aesthetic value，Look at the value of painting from a thorough multiple perspective。This，We can put painting and history、System and theoretical Bet365 app download background related，Explain the value of painting with this。For example，Andy Walkhol's "Bridge's Box" although it cannot be distinguished from ordinary items，But still artwork。

　　Bet365 lotto review