Human dignity is not a novel theme in the history of political philosophy and political thought，But near the late，Human dignity becomes a hot academic topic。This is not only a challenge encountered based on human dignity in the world's practice，It is also due to the latest development of science and technology that has already endangered the theoretical basis and science "basis" of the concept of human dignity to some extent。

From the perspective of conceptual history，The so -called "asymmetry in time" between the concept of human rights and human dignity (Habamas language)，Requires us to re -understand the tension between the two in the enlightenment tradition with freedom and equality as a value -oriented.，Eventually condensed in the Declaration of Human Dignity in the Basic Law of Germany and the World Human Rights Declaration，Then I have proposed how to understand the historical philosophical significance and word -effectiveness from the perspective of human rights foundation;，Human dignity in cultural context not only exceeds the vision inside the narrow enlightenment tradition，and the cause of laying a foundation for human rights into the cause of relativeism and anti -relativeism, as well as the dispute between the relativeism of the postmodernism, and the extensive context of essentialism and anti -essentialism。

Fundamental，The "asymmetry in time" between the concept of human rights and human dignity is a fact that cannot be changed，The reason why it attracts the re -attention of contemporary society，It is mainly caused by the declaration of human rights and human dignity after 1945，It Bet365 lotto review is this declaration that has promoted the above asymmetry between the human rights and human dignity of the enlightenment tradition。 

German human rights theorist Roman introduced the concept of "Entsetzen"，Interpretation of human dignity after 1945 from moral emotions。A specific emotional response as a specific emotional response between anxiety and fear，"Shock" emphasized a reaction to our overall situation: "When they are facing them as the norms of people in the world、The overall self -understanding of the evaluation。That's overwhelmed and uncomfortable，It is the normative architecture of the world。"is the incomprehensible and incomprehensible of the collapse of the standard evaluation standards，This makes it to overcome this shock，People can only find and obtain a new normative understanding from the perspective of effectiveness。Roman's interpretation of the historical philosophical significance of human rights and human dignity after 1945，It is the foundation on the basis of this kind of effectiveness，It is actually aimed at the innate rational ability and optimistic progress of progress depends on the enlightenment tradition represented by Kant。

In Romance，The absolute validity of human dignity from the perspective of exertion as the validity and normative origin，The dignity with human beings is actually a "open concept" and "unspeakable proposition"，These two are parallel to。On the one hand，As a value orientation that cannot continue to derive and demonstrate as itself，The absolute validity of human dignity is based on "Human community hopes that humans should have an absolute、That is from human existence itself、Not transferred、Human dignity that must not be lost at the same time "，When this hopes in the Bet365 app download form of legal documents are reflected in the "World Human Rights Declaration"，Semantic connotation of human dignity as a legal concept、Conceptual status and function is the result of Performativer AKT，Is a political setting，This setting "Establishs a new standard foundation for the legitimacy of all countries (national and international)"。On the other hand，Emphasize human dignity as "the concept of openness" and "unspeakable proposition"，It is also to use human dignity as a legal concept and as theology、Philosophy and ethical concepts of human dignity are distinguished.，In the final analysis, it is because of，Using the legal attributes of human dignity to judge all national power，This requirement cannot，By quoting "nature" or "rational" to defend。

Although Roman implemented a steering of consolidation，From this to，The redefining definition of international human rights politics from the perspective of human dignity must be understood as the moment when human beings have regained historical autonomy，But the semantic connotation of the concept of human dignity is still clear through the historical interpretation and reconstruction of the concept of dignity。Roman's dialectics of general dignity and special dignity，Like Taylor's traceability of the conceptual history of recognition and recognition of the conceptual history of the political institutes of general dignity，Fundamentally pointing to the internal tension of universalism and equalist politics with freedom and equality as the value -oriented，This kind of tension is architectural art that supplements the concept of rights with the concept of rights，After reconstruction of the asymmetry between human rights and human dignity，It still exists。

bet365 best casino games Habermas attracts attention to understand the dignity of human beings as a moral load on human rights afterwards，Pocket attention from the role of human dignity in the perspective of human dignity from moral obligations to legal rights.。Habermas admits the inner、Moral and compulsory with rational basis、Combination between the established laws，Just like the combination of Greece and Hebrew，It is a historical "accident"; on the other hand, it continues to be based on the architectural technique of morality and legal relationships from Kant，Focusing on the fundamental concept of "self -authorization for self -decision", a perspective conversion，The conversion from rational morality to rational law，"It is the recognition of this perspective change，Moral recognition among responsible action subjects exceeds its connotation，From its origin, it is actually born of ‘dignity’ ”。In this way，Habermas uses a dynamics of the concept of rights to supplement the spectrum of the concept of rights，Reconstruction of the history of concept，From the perspective of this dynamics, "flat" the "asymmetry in time" between human dignity and human rights。

The "asymmetry in time" between human dignity and human rights in the history of concept existed as symmetrical in the context of human rights theory and practice in the history of human rights。At the practical level，The asymmetry between this asymmetric and human rights and justice in the domestic and international politics has some form of correspondence，Although the asymmetry of domestic politics and international politics in institutional practice obviously cannot be explained from the perspective of cultural differences。At the theoretical level，The key lies in bet365 Play online games whether the concept of human dignity can provide a strong defense for the universality of human rights in cultural context。

Although Habermas acknowledges，"，Origin issues and validity problems，It is impossible to distinguish it so rigorously as possible in the case of the so -called validity requirements of cognition and standardization. "，But the two -point method of the dual division of ethics and morality from the classical philosophy of ethics and morality，Still restricting Habermaz to start a so -called value -in communication mode of German sociologist Hans Joas。The latter's interpretation of the "Affirmative Human Rights Spectrum Department" of the Declaration of Human Rights in the World Human Rights，Example of this value of this value，The "value" here is the concept of human dignity for human rights in the cultural context of human rights in cultural context。

It seems to be the perspective of the coronom of the human dignity in the World Human Rights Declaration of the World Human Rights，This value of this value of Joose's example，Expressing a similar tendency to Roman。For example，He quoted Malitan's words，Pointing to the way to the target "does not use the concept of common speculation，but based on the concept of common practice "，This is to emphasize that the "World Human Rights Declaration" is a "mixed complex"，It is a dynamic process that has a decisive role in various belief systems。Especially in human dignity、Human Rights and Christianity and Enlightenment's key issues，Joos combines Yelinek's topic with Weber topic，The defense of the concept of human dignity in the cultural context laid a solid foundation。

Roman handles universalism in the universalization of human rights and the concrete context of culture，Reconstruction of Kant'Bet365 app download s so -called respected morality proposes relative defense of generalist human rights。The universalism of Habermas's equalism through the history and theoretical reconstruction of human dignity and human rights relationship，Dynamics with a concept of rights supplement the architectural technique of the concept of rights，Because there is only this dynamics，Only allows us to maintain a "moving understanding"。Joos is a positive human rights spectrum at the core of the history of human rights as a person's sacred history.，Example of a self -reflection、The universalism of the context and the value of the value of the ethical reflection。

When talking about the point of pointing of a certain spectrum of human dignity and human rights，Joos pointed out，"It should be called affirmative is not this kind of approval of the current implementation situation，Instead of agreeing with the ideal appeal formed in history，Happy to realize the effective value that has been generated at the time or even the current effective value "。Dilai, who wandered in the tap of historicalism and interpretation, once said，"The relative things must be more profoundly associated with the general effective things。Understanding the entire past sympathy，It must be a force that forms the future "。Further discussions on universalism and human dignity issues in cultural context from the perspective of essentialism and constructive disputes，It is developed in such an open meaning space and gets promoted。 

　　bet365 best casino games