Recent，China Social Sciences Magazine Research Office organized a one -month online questionnaire survey on the theme of "Title Review" on the "Chinese Social Science Online" website，Active response from online readers。The fairness aspect of the on -the -job title review process，Survey shows，The number of participants recognized the impartiality (including "justice" and "more justice") and the number of people who did not recognize the impartiality (including "unfairness" and "not too fair") accounted for 44.8%of the total number of questionnaires bet365 live casino games ( figure 1)。Analysis of the answers to different identity people is displayed，83.3%of the judges recognized the fairness of the judging process，but 43.8%of the critics and 53.9%of the onlookers believe that the review has no fairness (Figure 5); among the four age groups，46-55 age groups are clearly identified as the proportion of number of people who are unfairly as high as 60%(Figure 6)。Visible，Despite the degree difference，Most people have realized the phenomenon of injustice in the review of professional title，For this，Nian Fu Liqiang、The middle -aged crowd as the main force participating in the evaluation touches deeply。But，It is undeniable，Basic fairness of the review process bet365 live casino games is still people’s consensus。Related to this，65.4%of the participants believe that the level of professional title can reflect the corresponding ability to a certain extent (Figure 2)。On "Is the Title Evaluation Need to Hook with Foreign Language Levels"，51.9%people think that the two are unnecessary，35.1%people believe that they can relax foreign language requirements depending on the specific situation (Figure 3)。For the problems existing in the review，Feedback according to the participants，According to the severity of the problem, it is arranged from high to low: the professional title review process is not strict，It is easy to breed corruption; the title of the title of the title is unreasonable Bet365 app download in proportion; there is no strict standard for review，There is a heavy capital、Light level; face monographs、Thesis and other results，There is a heavy number of light quality tendencies; too much number of high -level professional titles，True high -level talents are easily overwhelmed; research on scientific research、Light teaching; too many job title series、Excessive miscellaneous (Figure 4)。The open problem of "how to promote the Reform of the Professional Title Review"，Suggestions participating in the investigators include: to improve the judge team，Taking academic rather than official positions in the selection of judges，Implementing an anonymous review system for out bet365 live casino games -of -unit experts; improving the supervision mechanism，If the online public materials are publicly opened; the title is only linked to the honor、Not linked to interests; settings can make up for conditions，Do not engage in "one knife" for truly outstanding talents; teaching、Scientific research titles separately review; separate evaluation and employment。

    (Author Unit: Research Office of the Chinese Social Sciences Magazine)