Create a Chinese discourse system for philosophy and social sciences，In the final analysis, it must form with Chinese characteristics、Chinese style、Chinese style of philosophy and social science innovation system，Introduction can reflect China's position、Chinese spirit、Research results at the level of China。To achieve this goal，The right to formulate academic standards is fundamental，Evaluation of the evaluation of academic achievements is the key。If we are academic、What is not academics; what results are best，What are the inferior results on these basic issues，Lack of objective、A fair evaluation standard，Do not have the necessary right to speak，That means that our academic research lacks necessary specifications and leaders，Can't form your own strength and characteristics。65 years after New China、Especially the development of 36 years of reform and opening up，Build a social scientific evaluation system with distinctive Chinese characteristics，Has become Chinese academic towards the future、The inevitable requirements and basic prerequisites to the world。

　　bet365 live casino games

Since the reform and opening up，Especially since the 1990s，With the progress of philosophy and social science research、Strengthening Chinese and foreign academic exchanges，my country began to absorb consciously、Drawing on the international academic evaluation mechanism，Gradually formed a journal、The academic evaluation system of the institution's focus，Journal、The number and level of post -documents and levels of monographs are used as important indicators for evaluating scientific research results。This set of evaluation methods，For facilitation of scientific research management、Incentive scientific research、Promoting the prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences in the new period has played an important role。But in the actual execution process，It also exposed some problems。

First, excessive bias indicators。my country's current academic evaluation system，Usually influencing factor、Reprint rates and other quantitative indicators are used as the core standard of the quality and academic journal level of evaluation papers，This approach has its rationality。Quantitative indicators are indeed a necessary reference for evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of scientific research results，The objectivity of helping to maintain academic evaluation，And easy to operate。But I also have to see，Quantitative indicators have its limitations，Not enough to comprehensively measure the quality and influence of scientific research results。For example，Some unique research results，The reprint rate、Impact factor is often unable to compare with the research results of application countermeasures，But it Bet365 app download has unique value in the inheritance of civilization，This is difficult to reflect the quantitative indicator。In fact，The high reference rate is the discussion，It may not be a superior work; the reference rate is low，may not lack academic content，Some still fill the academic gap、Open the Treasures of the Style of the Discipline。Therefore，Excessive bias indicators，seemingly objective、Justice，In fact, it is implicitly implicit。and currently，my country exists in the disadvantages of excessive quantification。Scientific research institution、Evaluation of scientific researchers，Light quality; for academic journals、Evaluation of Academic Press，Excessive respect for reprinting rate、Impact factor，Ignore its academic responsibility and academic responsibility。For this tendency，It is necessary for academic circles to take measures to correct。

The second is to leave the actual research of scientific research。Current academic evaluation，Lack of necessary interaction and communication between the evaluations and researchers，There is a situation that has evaluated the actual situation of scientific research。This is mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the evaluation process lacks the participation of scholars including journal editing，Unilateral behavior of the evaluation person，Researchers' views and willingness to the development of disciplines are difficult to reflect in the evaluation results; the second is that the evaluation system is too general，Not fully taken into account the uniqueness of different disciplines。In fact，Humanities and Social Sciences，Cross Discipline、Emerging Disciplines and Traditional mainstream disciplines (such as history、Economics, etc.)，The difference is very large，Use an indicator system，It is difficult to reflect the real situation of the development of different disciplines。A comprehensive academic evaluation system，It must be based on the actual development of academic development，Collective will to reflect the academic community。

Third is human factors interference。Academic is a matter of thousands of autumn，Academic evaluation relationship Qianqiu。Current，There is a serious utilitarian tendency in the academic world，Chasing Name and Following Blood、The phenomenon of urgency and close profit spread，and the incomplete academic evaluation mechanism、Evaluation standard opaque、Not disclosed in the review process、The absence of the academic supervision mechanism，Learning to find power for power、Money transaction phenomena occur from time to time。For example，To improve the impact factor，The person in charge of some academic journals is busy running relationship、Public relations，Journal between the journals，Even forced the author to promise to be reprinted after his article was published，Not only corrupted academic atmosphere，and damage the fairness and legitimacy of academic evaluation。Another example，Pass review was originally a useful bet365 Play online games attempt to correct quantitative evaluation，But twisted in the specific implementation，Impactia selected by review experts，Minority review experts cannot be independent in strict accordance with academic quality、A fair review，Often alienated near、Power size and personal good and evil as the basis for judging，thus shaking the professionalism and authority of peer evaluation。

Fourth is lack of guidance。The process of academic evaluation，It is also the process of academic leadership。Academic evaluation passes through scientific research results、Publishing platform、Research institution determines the level、Clarify the advantages and disadvantages，Research orientation of scholars，To achieve academic guidance。A sound and mature academic evaluation system，Must have your own value position，Must be answered where the academic goes come from.，You must pass justice、Objective、Evaluation of internal travel，Point out the success or failure of academic research and the future development path，It is by no means "faint by yourself，Make people Zhao Zhao "。If we pursue the so -called independence and neutrality of academic evaluation，Give up the mission to lead academics，Use quantification indicators instead of thinking about academic direction，Refined analysis of the development of disciplines with general standards，Listen to the interference of evaluation with non -academic factors，Our academic evaluation will eventually lose in the "Learning Sea"，Follow the current，Can't find a way out。In fact，Guidance of strengthening academic evaluation，It is a problem that the current social science evaluation in my country is urgent。

　　Three relationships need to be dealt with

my country's philosophy and social science，It is facing unprecedented development opportunities，Constructing a philosophical and social science evaluation system，Must adhere to three conducive to: conducive to adhering to the correct academic direction，Consolidating the guiding position of the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the research of philosophy and social sciences; it is conducive to promoting theoretical innovation and academic prosperity，Create a Chinese discourse system for philosophy and social sciences; it is conducive to Chinese academic to the world，and the international mainstream academic development equality、Dignificant dialogue and communication，Contribute to the improvement of world civilization for China、China Experience、China Wisdom。In specific work，To deal with three sets of relationships。

First，The relationship between theoretical leadership and academic standard。Compared with natural science，Philosophy and Social Sciences have a significant feature，That is the distinctive ideology attribute，Classality、Nationality is an essential attribute that any academic genre cannot be avoided。Today's International School，"The saying of the family，Bee out "，Various trends of thoughts、blend、Competition。Humanities and Social Sciences of China，Carrying bet365 Play online games the excellent academic tradition of the Chinese nation，The great practice based on the modernization of China's modernization，Marxism is the banner and soul of contemporary Chinese academics，Serving socialism with Chinese characteristics is the mission of the era。Construction of an academic evaluation system must serve this attribute，Persist in the guiding position of Marxism in academic evaluation，Promoting the formation of the philosophy and social science innovation system。What needs to be pointed out is，In Marxist academics，Science and class is not contradictory，Adhere to theoretical leadership and academic standards is not contradictory。On the one hand, we cannot give up the historical responsibility leading the academic direction，On the other hand, you cannot simplify academic evaluation to political evaluation，Instead, it is necessary to implement the "Double Hundred" policy，Discussion on promoting different academic views、Fighting and communication，The formation and development of support and protection schools。To pass justice、Objective academic evaluation，Promoting scholars adhere to the spirit of science、Scientific Principles，Excellent achievements that can withstand practice and historical test，Demonstrate the strong vitality and appeal of the academic academic theory of Sinicization in China。

Second，Based on the relationship between China and the world。my country's current academic evaluation system，Especially for academic journals、Evaluation of academic institutions，I have learned a lot of methods from Western countries。This has certain inevitability and reasonableness，A positive effect on the standardization of social scientific research。But I also have to see，In the international academic discourse system，Lack of Chinese Voice、Chinese factors、China Influence，It is a prominent problem we face。Take the magazine evaluation as an example，Blindly respecting social science quotes, which is SSCI，Regardless of its original intention，Simply use it as a journal and thesis evaluation tool，Some academic journals are proud of squeezing into SSCI，Some scientific research institutions will give special re -prizes to scholars published in SSCI journals。This kind of tendency to blindly respect the foreign index system，originated from the lack of SSCI in -depth understanding，Very unfavorable academic development。Philosophy and Social Sciences have always have a clear nationality，Chinese academic gains and mistakes will eventually be evaluated by the Chinese themselves。Build a Chinese academic evaluation system，Evaluation method for foreign countries，Persist in my main、Principles I used for me，The reference you should learn，Abandoned abandonment，At the same time，Based on the actual situation of Chinese academics，Develop your own evaluation standards，Unilateral pursuit of integration with the international mainstream academic evaluation system，Not to "cut the foot to achieve"。Based on this，Also use our Chinese people'bet365 Play online games s own vision，Examine international academic storm，Differential right and wrong，Clearly high，The voices of Chinese scholars themselves for the future of academics，This is the deserved meaning of China's academic academic to the world。

third，The relationship between quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation。Quantitative evaluation objective、Accurate、Easy operation，The fairness of ensuring academic evaluation、Avoiding subjective randomness is of great significance。But simply quantitative evaluation cannot bear the heavy task of scientific evaluation。Quantitative evaluation cannot accommodate those "impact factor" that are difficult to quantify，The academic contribution of a research results is by no means judged by simply relying on the reference rate，often requires industry experts to carefully consider and evaluate the academic history and current research status of this major，This requires the qualitative evaluation into the academic evaluation system。That is to say，Lack of quantitative qualitative evaluation is subjective and casual，and the lack of qualitative quantitative evaluation is incomplete。The evaluation system we want to build，It should be combined with quantitative and qualitative，On the basis of fully grasping the data material，Multi -angle deep essential analysis and generalization，Efforts to realize the dynamic balance of quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation。

　　Deepening the academic evaluation system reform

Reform of the Chinese Academic Evaluation System，We must persist in guiding Marxism，The purpose of serving socialism with Chinese characteristics，To promote theoretical innovation、Academic prosperity is responsible，To enhance China's academic discourse power as the pursuit。The following aspects are worthy of our attention。

First，Improve the peer review system。Pass review is an academic evaluation method widely used at home and abroad。This was first used by Western countries for patent review、After being promoted to the evaluation system published by academic books，After more than 200 years of continuous improvement，Forming a whole set includes the selection of experts、Anonymous review、Collective voting、Public discussion system, including the evaluation system，strongly promoted the healthy development of academic research and the formation of academic communities。After introducing the peer review system，The healthy development of academic academic，It produced a very important role，But the system is not sound、Procedure is not standardized、Insufficient supervision and other problems。In order to maximize the positive role of peer review，To improve the expert selection mechanism，Consider the knowledge structure、Academic achievements、Evaluation level and academic ethics to determine expert candidates，Avoid layman evaluation internally，Avoid the low level and randomness of academic evaluation。Academic Journal、Academic work publishing should further strengthen the two -way anonymous review and expert avoidance bet365 best casino games system，Control the interference of peer evaluations for the relationship between human relationships and interests，Improve the fairness of peer review。The system of academic evaluation appeals and accountability should be established，Channel provided by the judge，Express the malfeasance of the review expert，For the rights and money transactions in the review、Latin Gang Master、Scholars and other academic misconduct zero tolerance。

Second，Evaluation function of strengthening academic journals。In modern academic development，Academic journals have always been an important release platform for cutting -edge results，Play an irreplaceable role in leading academic development。Even the European and American academic circles，Publishing an article in what grade of academic journals is also an important basis for measuring scholars' research skills。To enhance the academic evaluation function of academic journals，The key lies in improving the level of the journal of academic journals，Eliminating Relations Draft、Human Love Draft and Money Draft，Cultivate and establish the credibility of academic journals。For this，To establish a strict anonymous review system and multi -level review system within the journal，Dispel the interference of non -academic factors through strict review processes。To promote the editorial department to run the journal at the commanding heights of history and the times，Create a politics、Understand theory、Tong academic high -quality editing team，Improve the editor "Sali Gold、Point Shishijin "academic screening ability and manuscript processing ability，Let the academic journals be in the evaluation of academic achievements，Getting off the orientation effect。

third，Rich academic evaluation content and means。There are academic activities，There is an academic evaluation。Academic evaluations are both for individual researchers，It is also necessary to widen the field of vision，Extend the scope of evaluation to discipline、Think Tank、University、Region，and even the international academic circles and online academic activities。For academic institutions，Evaluation of scientific research results，Also academic talents、Academic Team、Academic atmosphere evaluation。In the evaluation system，To achieve the diversification of indicators and means，Combining qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation，Combination of results evaluation and process evaluation，Combination of readers' evaluation and editing evaluation，Expert evaluation and questionnaire survey，At the same time，Pay attention to listening to the opinions of the evaluation object。Be good at using new media technology，Innovation academic evaluation method，Incorporate the online influence into the evaluation indicator system，Carry out network questionnaire surveys and remote video review，Establish an expert database，Open the network report channel，Make the academic evaluation run in the sun，It can withstand the public's review and inspection。

Fourth，Establish independence、Justice、Authoritative academic evaluation agency。Host fair，Ecnourcing to Direction，It should be the realm pursuit of academic evaluation，To achieve this goal，Establishment of independence、Authoritative academic evaluation agency，to avoid evaluation objects、Non -academic interference of interest groups。In Contemporary China，An influential academic evaluation agency，It must have several basic conditions: adhere to the firm and correct political and theoretical direction，The law of academic development、The current status of development has a deeper understanding，Recognize your academic mission and academic responsibility; there are more complete academic data database and survey analysis platforms，There are relatively good academic evaluation standards、Evaluation system and evaluation process; there is a loyalty、Dedicated professional academic evaluation team，Have strong credibility in the academic world、Cognitive and organizational ability。Only with these conditions，can we truly assume objective development of academic development、​​The heavy responsibility of impartial evaluation。

In short，Construction suitable for Chinese national conditions、Philosophy and social science evaluation system with distinctive Chinese characteristics，It is the basic requirement for the current prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences，It is also creating Chinese academic discourse rights、An important prerequisite for promoting China's academic academic to the world，Ren Daoyuan，Need to work together for national philosophy and social science workers。

　　(The author is the Secretary -General of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences、Director of China Social Science Evaluation Center、Researcher)