Abstract:In recent years，Some countries advocate a “rules-based international order”。But，These countries have not made it clear that the "rules" referred to in the "rules-based international order" refer to "international law" and thus elaborated on their rules-based view of the international order。In fact，A series of legal practices implemented in these countries show that，To a large extent, it pursues the supremacy of domestic law over international law，The rule-based view that regional international law overrides universal international law and politicizes international law。This view of rules undermines the role of international law in the international order，It goes against the requirements of the times to improve global governance and promote the establishment of a more just and reasonable international order。In order to correct the rules-based view pursued by these countries by advocating a "rules-based international order"，China advocates “an bet365 sportsbook review on international law”。The concept of rules embodied in “bet365 sportsbook review on international law” is，Confirm that international law based on the Charter of the United Nations is the authoritative system of rules for regulating international relations，At the same time, it does not exclude the role of other rules that do not violate international law in the international order。