Bet365 lotto review Hedgger and Xiapiro's controversy on the painting "Shoes" on Brahma Gordon is a famous public case in the history of modern art。The former advocates an intuitive intuition for the work，The latter adopts a prejudice understanding method，Two methods are derived from phenomenology and interpretation。Different methods lead to different results，Heidegger's error is that there is no strict implementation of phenomenal restoration，Therefore, I brought unreasonable prejudices into the work; Charlo's success is to rationally unify the phenomenal method and interpretation method，On the basis of fine intuition to the work，Reasonably played the role of prejudice。This controversy revealed us，The understanding of the meaning of art works should be: First, the intuitive intuition of the work，To ensure the beginning of the source of the work; the second is the prejudice understanding，Let the reasonable prejudice give full play to its role。Only the comprehensive use of these two methods，can the meaning of the work reasonably explained。

　Keywords:Apicking understanding of phenomenon explanation

Author Su Hongbin，Professor of Chinese Department of Bet365 lotto review Zhejiang University (Hangzhou 310058)。