Publicity of public discussion and academic research — two directions for both social science autonomy
April 12, 2018 16:30 Source: China Social Sciences Magazine Author: Sun Guodong

  Bet365 app download Academic research under modern conditions is a typical way of "rational public use",The truth is easy to fallacy,In nature (academic) in the public domain -based public discussion, the consensus caused by the main body。The autonomy and publicity of academic research have internal associations,It includes two directions: external and internal direction: both independent economy、Politics、Society and other fields,Also independent personal value preferences; they correspond to the publicity of the publicity and the publicity of the stance。To ensure the autonomy of social science,We need to follow the fair principle on the position,Adhering to the principle of recognition in terms of content。In "The Truth of the Truth/Truth",Practice public discussion、Public rationality,The mission of intellectuals。

  Keywords:Reasonable public use public discussion of truth consensus autonomy

Author Sun Guodong,Associate Professor (Shanghai 200433)。

Editor in charge: Cui Cen
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link: The official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxian 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Bet365 lotto review Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026