zhang haibo a and Tang Xing B

A and B SCHOOL of Government, Nanjing University

　　bet365 live casino games From the Perspective of Systems Thinking, China ’s Emergency Management Structure Can Be Analyzed in Terms of Five Dimensions: Social Change, Governance Transformation, Government Framework, Policy System and Operational Mechanisms. On the Basis of Comparative Analysis, We Discuss Structural CHANGE Across the Dimensions by Targeting Our Research on Major Disaster ake in 2013. overall, Consolidation and Evolution Coexist in China ’s Emergency Management Structure. At present, Structural Consolidation Has The Upper Hand, But there are also forces driving structural evolution. USING Induction log and the comparativer method, We Arrive at a ATheoretical Generalization About the Structural Consolidation of China ’s Emergency Management, Demonstration its "Comet-Shaped" Structure and "Comet-Tail" Effect. On this Basis, We Put FORWARD OUR TheRETIRTICAL Propositions. We Believe that the Underlying Reason for the Developmental PredicAMENT FARGENCY Management In CH INA TODAY is that it goes ahead on its own, Divorced from Structure. ITS FURTHER Development Must Go Back to Structure and Change with the Times, With a View to Promotion The Structural Evolution of China ’s Emergedment Management.

　　Keywords:Emergency Management, Systems Thinking, Public Governance, DISASTER RELIEF MeChanism, Policy System, Social Risk