Calculable Power in International Organization: A Case Study of IMF Quotas and Voting Rights Reform
November 29, 2017 09:51 Source: Social Sciences in China Press Author: Huang Wei

Huang Wei

Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

  bet365 Play online games Voting procedure is an important mechanism for public choice in international organizations. This paper measures and compares IMF member countries’ voting power before the 2008 reform and after the 2010 reform on the basis of datasets on IMF quotas and voting rights distribution provided by IMF. Our study verifies that IMF’s quotas and voting rights reforms do help to reduce the voting power gap among member countries. The 2008 and 2010 reforms produce a greater improvement in emerging members’ voting power under the 70 percent majority rule than the 85 percent rule; the 70 percent majority rule means the United States would lose its absolute veto. Moreover, the paper disproves the underlying assumption that regards a member’s voting power as proportional to its voting rights. Countries with different amounts of voting rights can still have the same voting power.

  Keywords:quotas,voting rights reform,majority rule,power index

  

Editor: Cui Cen
QR code icon 2.jpg
Highly recommended
Latest article
bet365 live casino games

Friendly links: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website registration number: Beijing Public Network Security No. 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by Bet365 lotto review China Social Sciences Magazine. No reproduction or use without permission is allowed

Chief editor’s email: zzszbj@126.com Contact information of this website: 010-85886809 Address: Floor 11-12, Building 1, No. 15 Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing Postal Code: 100026