wang fuhua

SCHOOL of Law, SHANGHAI University of Finance and Economics

　bet365 best casino games As an Economic Factor Affecting Access to Justice, The Cost of Justice Nature Constitutes An Element of Judicial Reform. It is the overald deConStruction of the Cost of Civil Justice., Rather than Partial Observation and Analysis Confined to Litchation Costs, That Can Legitimize the Sharing of Court and LITIGATION COSTS and Clarify the Demarcation Between Public and Private Costs. Sharing is intended to Establish a Balance Between The State's Investment of Public Resources in the Judicial System and The Costs Borne by the Litigant. The Second-Order Rule of Cost -Shaaring Center up of the Goal of Just and Equitable Sharing of Litchation Costs, But Also the Overal Consideration of the Adjustment Function of the Cost Mechanis in LITIGATION and PURSUIT of the General Improvement of the. System. The Third-Order Cost-Shaaring Rule Should Focus on Giving Full Play to the Legal Services Market and Social Organizations in Sharing the Cost of Litchation. Its Success Will Depend on the Development of Professional Ethics and on Legal Regulation.

　　Keywords: Court Costs, LITIGATION COSTS, Rights Protection, Judicial Reform