wang Cheng

SCHOOL of Law, Peking University

　　bet365 best casino games Despite Its Safety and Convenience, modern technology has turned out to be an alienating force independent of humankind. The relationship between modern technology and human development furnishes the macro-background for the discussion of personal information protection issues. Chinese law should respond actively to avoid being reduced to a "Morass of Rules" in the Global Context. China's Legislation On Personal Information Protection Emphasizes Public Law at the Expense of Private Law; e rule based support of basic civy. Within the lemStatem, Civil Law is an important Means and Basic Norm for Protection the Agency of Human Beings, As it can provide systemic support for the property of polsonal information. Formulation of the CorresPonding Should ESTABLISH The IndustEPEND ENT Control of Personal Information by the Subject of the Information, And Should Reinforce The Position of the Weaker Side in The Internet Relationship. With Regard to selectings Al incormation, The Models of Indirect Protection and Legal Interest Protection Both Have Flaws; The Rights Protection Model is Better Suited to China's Legi. Slative and Judicial Realities. The right to figure is be embeedded in the existing normal. Compatability of the lead system. The Rights Protection Model Should be Adopted in the Personality Right Section of the Civil Code.

　　Keywords: Right to Personal Information, Alienating force of Science and Technology,Protection Model, civil code