Assessing the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，Analyze the pros and cons，This is a method more recognized by various countries in recent years，It is also an important means to comprehensively promote the rule of bet365 bonus bets。Long time，How is the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，Mainly relies on abstraction、Qualitative judgment method，Lack of systematic support with objective results，It is difficult to grasp the strengths and weaknesses of the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets。In recent years，Introducing systematic and quantitative research methods into the evaluation process of the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，Effectively improved the above situation。The objectives and strengths of conducting a rule of bet365 bonus bets assessment are，Some areas can be measured with a relatively scientific and systematic set of indicators、The development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets in certain areas，Relatively objective、Intuitively summarize and analyze its effects and problems，And put forward targeted improvement suggestions。

　　Theoretical assumptions of bet365 bonus bets are crucial

Any evaluation of the rule of bet365 bonus bets needs to rely on a set of indicator systems to measure the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets in a certain place and industry，The setting of this set of indicators and the selection of methods must be based on certain theoretical assumptions，Make sure it has solid theoretical support、In line with the corresponding theoretical logic，Rather than just conjecture。For example，When assessing the overall development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets in a region，Evaluators must clarify what “rule of bet365 bonus bets” is。A third-party evaluation of Sichuan’s rule of bet365 bonus bets province conducted by the author’s team、The third-party assessment of Qianhai Rule of bet365 bonus bets Index is an example，We propose，The basic meaning of rule of bet365 bonus bets is simple、Clear，There is a good method，The behavior of the whole society has rules to follow，The rules formulated must reflect the interests and will of the broad masses of the people，Embody democracy and science；Laws and other rules should be implemented，Administrative agencies must not only serve economic and social development，We must also fully perform our duties in accordance with the bet365 bonus bets，Strengthening economic and social supervision and management；All disputes should be resolved within the framework of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，Achieve fair justice、Improve judicial credibility；The formulation and implementation of laws should be open and transparent，Make people’s behavior predictable，Reduce social conflicts and transaction costs；Both public authorities and the general public should know the bet365 bonus bets、Respect the Dharma、Abiding by the bet365 bonus bets。Accordingly，The setting of indicators for regional rule of bet365 bonus bets assessment should generally focus on legislation (rule making)、Government Rule of bet365 bonus bets、Judicial Construction、A society ruled by bet365 bonus bets、Safeguard supervision mechanism and other contents。

Another example，In assessing government transparency，Although it is mainly to evaluate the implementation of the "Government Information Disclosure Regulations" and related laws and regulations by government agencies at all levels，However, whether government management is transparent requires evaluating whether relevant government information is disclosed in accordance with the bet365 bonus bets from the perspective of those who demand government information、Whether the disclosed information effectively meets public needs and whether it can be easily obtained, etc.。Anyway，The evaluation of the rule of bet365 bonus bets can only have clear and reliable theoretical presuppositions and support，In order to ensure that the assessment activities and results are scientifically reliable and convincing。

　　The setting of bet365 bonus bets indicators must be planned and operable

On the premise of planning the theoretical assumptions，We must also adhere to the principle that indicators must be set "in accordance with the bet365 bonus bets" for the evaluation of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，That is, the requirements made against public authorities must be based on the principle that "nothing can be done without express provisions of the bet365 bonus bets"，Only those with clear requirements in laws and regulations can be included in the evaluation index system。Accordingly，The main assessment is the operation of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，Focus on whether the legal system is well implemented，It can also be observed whether the reason why it is not implemented is because the relevant regulations are unscientific or unrealistic。At the same time，The setting of rule of bet365 bonus bets evaluation indicators requires the selection of evaluation-related indicators、Typical "rule of bet365 bonus bets" incident。Various events occur in reality，Only events related to the rule of bet365 bonus bets and events closely related to the evaluation of the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets in a certain field can be included as indicators in the evaluation index system。Such as wind and rain are just a natural phenomenon，Not related to the rule of bet365 bonus bets，But once a disaster occurs，is evaluating government emergency management、Disaster relief and other aspects may become events related to the rule of bet365 bonus bets。Court police officers handling and executing cases in the online case handling system are only internal activities，But when evaluating whether the court may have a low level of handling cases，Or it is an important judgment indicator when there may be regulatory blind spots in the standardization of case handling and execution。At the same time，The setting of rule of bet365 bonus bets evaluation indicators also needs to pay attention to the logic between indicators，Ensure its scientific nature。If the number of corruption cases investigated and dealt with is large, it can reflect that the discipline inspection and supervision department in a certain place is more effective in handling cases，It can also explain the construction of clean government for local cadres、There are shortcomings in the standardization of power operation；Another example，It is the right of the counterparty to sue administrative agencies，The courage to prosecute is precisely a manifestation of the gradual improvement of the people’s awareness of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，At the same time，It does not rule out the existence of certain abuses，Then，It is obviously unreasonable to simply use the situation of administrative agencies being sued to assess administration according to bet365 bonus bets。In addition，You also need to pay attention to the operability of the evaluation indicators，Ensure that the designed indicators have clear meaning in actual evaluation、Easy to operate。How to evaluate the process of judicial disclosure，If you simply set an indicator such as "Convenient to query judicial information"，It will make the evaluators confused，Must specify where to search、How to find out。

Finally，Indicator setting should help ensure the objectivity of evaluation，Avoid giving evaluators too much discretion。The indicators set should only allow evaluators to make yes or no judgments based on certain facts，Do not let it judge the degree of good or bad。To achieve this purpose，It is necessary to specify the content that each evaluation index aims to achieve to evaluate the quality and inferiority of certain aspects。If it is standardized or not、Convenience is one of the goals of the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets in certain fields，But if these qualitative terms are simply set in the indicators，Then the evaluator has too much room for discretion，And different evaluators may make different or even very different judgment results on the same event。How to evaluate whether the court's handling of cases in civil enforcement work is standardized，It needs to be detailed as to whether the case is accepted in accordance with the bet365 bonus bets、Whether a property reporting order was sent within the specified period、Whether property inspection and control were conducted within the specified period、Whether the execution funds are paid in full and on time, etc.，These links are in compliance with regulations，Nature is standardized。Another example，Investigating the convenience of government websites disclosing government information，It needs to be refined to whether the website has set up a special column for relevant information、Whether relevant information is published in a special column、Is there any further classification in the special column、Whether the function is set and effective, etc.。

　　Based bet365 bonus bets real situation and data that can be grasped

Data acquisition methods are generally divided into subjective methods and objective methods。The former mainly relies on the subjective feelings and judgments of the interviewee or evaluator to draw conclusions，such as conducting interviews with interviewees、Conduct a questionnaire or have the evaluator give a score based on the situation of the evaluee。Interview is a common investigation method，Communicating with interviewees helps to understand the achievements and problems of relevant aspects，Successful interviews often capture a large amount of useful information in a short period of time。But the success of the interview often depends on the communication between the investigator and the interviewee、The interviewee’s own job experience, etc.，The information collected may be fragmented，And highly subjective。Questionnaire survey is a commonly used method in rule of bet365 bonus bets investigation and evaluation in recent years，Some rule of bet365 bonus bets assessments directly rely on respondents to assign scores to relevant rule of bet365 bonus bets issues。The advantage is that it is easy to operate、The cost is relatively low，But the difficulty is that the quality of the questionnaire design itself and the selection of survey samples are crucial，And when directly asking about satisfaction with certain issues, there is often strong subjectivity due to the respondent’s own factors。For example, when asking a person under administrative detention whether he is satisfied with the bet365 bonus bets enforcement by the police at the police station，It is difficult to expect that it can give objective conclusions；Another example is asking both parties in a litigation case about their satisfaction with the judge handling the case，It may also be because the demands of both parties have not been fully supported、Some attitude issues faced by judges during court hearings and other processes and unable to get close to actual answers。When using the expert scoring method，It often convenes a group of experts in certain fields，Professionalism is guaranteed to a certain extent，However, experts often base their judgment on written materials or oral reports provided by the person being evaluated，Due to the lack of personal experience, it is also easy for everyone’s evaluation scale to be very different。

Objectivity methods can help solve the above problems。Capturing and analyzing official data is an objective approach，If you can extract the data of cases that have been closed by the court and analyze whether the judgment documents of each case are online in the subsequent period、Time online, etc.。When using official data, you need to pay attention to the quality bet365 bonus bets data itself，Perform validation and eliminate some inaccurate data。Observation and verification from a third-party perspective is also an objectivity method，If based on the preset indicator system，Observe the disclosure of information on government or court websites，Or actually verify the service process，For example, actually issuing a government information disclosure application，Experience and observe and analyze the smoothness of channels and the degree of standardization of responses when government agencies handle applications。

Finally，Evaluation must achieve effective interaction between the evaluator and the evaluee。The value and significance of rule of bet365 bonus bets assessment is that it can have a certain impact and promotion effect on the development of the rule of bet365 bonus bets，Therefore，The evaluator must interact effectively with the evaluee regarding the evaluation results，Includes the ability to provide feedback on assessment results、Clear the issues identified by the assessment、Propose suggestions for improvement。This requires that the evaluation results must have a certain quality，The indicator system is scientific and feasible、The results are objective, true and reliable、Both the theoretical system and results can be questioned and verified。Otherwise，The evaluator evaluates his own，The person being evaluated still goes his own way，Then，The evaluation of the rule of bet365 bonus bets has lost its due meaning。Anyway，Rule of bet365 bonus bets assessment is a booster to promote the rule of bet365 bonus bets，But to play a good role，We must ensure scientific evaluation、Proper method、Reliable results。

　　(The author is a special researcher at the Research Center for Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences、Researcher at the Institute of bet365 bonus bets)