With the development of artificial intelligence technology，Algorithms are increasingly integrated into all areas of the digital economy and digital life。As the operating law of the digital world，The regulation and supervision of algorithms should be committed to building a value orientation for a new order of digital civilization，Support and ensure China’s digital economy appears on the world stage。The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued the "Implementation Outline for the Construction of a Rule of Law Society (2020-2025)"，Proposed to formulate and improve algorithm recommendations、Standardized management measures for the application of new technologies such as deep forgery，The "Internet Information Service bet365 bonus bets Management Regulations" (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulations") came into being in this context。The "Regulations" provide specifications from the design level of bet365 bonus bets，Covering algorithm discrimination、"Big Data Killing"、Hot issues such as inducing addiction，Proposed a Chinese plan for comprehensive management of bet365 bonus bets services。The concept it conveys is clear: to do good by advocating technology，Achieving traceability of algorithm behavior、Strong algorithm supervision、Algorithm regulation is effective，Thus promoting the systematization of algorithm governance and the modernization of cyberspace governance。

　　Adhere to the positive bet365 bonus bets concept of technology for good

The "Regulations" clarify that bet365 bonus bets providers should adhere to mainstream value orientation，Optimization bet365 bonus bets mechanism，Actively spread positive energy，Promote the application of algorithms for good。This concept runs throughout: bet365 bonus bets providers shall not use algorithm recommendation services to engage in illegal activities or spread illegal information；It is not allowed to generate synthetic false news information or disseminate news information released by units that are not within the scope of national regulations；Do not use algorithms to influence online public opinion、Avoiding supervision and management, monopolizing and unfair competition behaviors, etc.。Algorithmic recommendation service can be based on user interests、Hobbies and needs，Provide a more personalized and convenient information acquisition experience。However, algorithm recommendations that lack regulation can easily lead to algorithm black boxes、Algorithmic discrimination、Algorithm addiction and many other problems。How to calibrate the course for technological innovation and development within the legal framework，We need to explore an equitable law that encourages innovation and protects rights。

The first “mobile phone traffic hijacking case” heard by Hangzhou Internet Court，Fully consider the subjective intention of the bet365 bonus bets behind using the mobile App wake-up strategy to implement traffic hijacking。By effectively balancing network users’ right to know and their right to choose independently、Multiple legal interests such as market competitive equity value，Finally ordered the defendant to stop the unfair competition behavior involved in the case、Compensation for economic losses, etc.，Draw legal and reasonable boundaries for technological innovation and development。This case has a negative impact on Article 4 of the Regulations, which states that “the provision of algorithm recommendation services shall respect social morality and ethics，Abide by business ethics and professional ethics" and explained and confirmed it with vivid examples，It may provide more new ideas for further activating "promoting the application of algorithms for good"。

　　Focus bet365 bonus bets combination of "rule of law" and "autonomy"

With the development of the Internet economy，The network platform is designed through algorithms、Deployment and Application，Become an important subject of network operations。Therefore, for bet365 bonus bets services and other algorithms, the phenomenon of “algorithmic power” formed by embedded social power，The dual identity of the platform as an important "governance subject" and "governance object" must be made clear。In other words，Deepen governance into the underlying architecture of the platform，Let platforms serve as “formulators and enforcers of governance rules” under the rule of law。

One of the innovative highlights of the "Regulations" is，On the basis of following the algorithmic technical logic，Clearly constructed the algorithm accountability mechanism in the platform economy scenario，The veil of “technology neutrality” of algorithmic automated decision-making has been pierced through legislation。For example, Article 8 of the "Regulations": "bet365 bonus bets providers should be reviewed regularly、Evaluation、Verification algorithm mechanism、Model、Data and application results, etc.，Do not set settings to induce users to become addicted、Algorithm model that violates laws and regulations or violates ethics such as excessive consumption。”Algorithms, as the underlying technical logic of the platform, become the subject of direct supervision，The subjective intention of algorithm design and deployment is expected to become the basis for accountability。The first public data utilization case heard by Hangzhou Internet Court，The dispute arises from a platform that directly released information about "the plaintiff's bankruptcy and liquidation" without review。Although the information is automatically extracted by the algorithm、Generate，But the actual operating company of the platform is in algorithm design、Operation Supervision、You should have a certain duty of care during the results review process。“Technology neutrality” is not the same as “value neutrality”。Technology itself is neutral，But after being injected with design concepts，It becomes blameworthy。Therefore，In the platform design that is clearly an bet365 bonus bets provider、Deployment and application of algorithms based on responsibility，Comprehensive consideration of the platform’s actual control over different infringements、Result predictability、Subjective intention and subsequent relief measures, etc.，Formulate the principle of algorithmic responsibility that equals responsibility and ability，Promote the development and improvement of platform autonomy within the framework of the rule of law。For example, recommendations for artificial intelligence media algorithms，You can require the platform as an bet365 bonus bets provider to continuously improve the algorithm operation mode，Reconcile the relationship between trend algorithms and personality algorithms that are more closely related to public discourse，Reduce the “information cocoon” effect while providing services。

　　Refined regulatory classification bet365 bonus bets

"Regulations" in terms of supervision ideas，Displayed classification classification、Legislative concept of precise governance。On the one hand, it is based on the attributes of public opinion or social mobilization ability、Content category、User scale、The importance of data processed by algorithm recommendation technology、Implement hierarchical and classified management for different degrees of intervention in user behavior，On the other hand, specific specifications are made for bet365 bonus bets providers for different entities。

The "Regulations" put forward the concept of "bet365 bonus bets providers with public opinion attributes or social mobilization capabilities"，Make it clear that the name of the service provider should be reported、Service form、Application fields、Algorithm type、Algorithm self-assessment report、Stricter obligations such as filing procedures for information such as the content to be disclosed and conducting security assessments。Recommend service provider capabilities based on algorithm、Set corresponding class-level management mechanisms such as user scale，Conducive to better realizing hierarchical governance。However, the connotation and logical boundaries of “bet365 bonus bets providers with public opinion attributes or social mobilization capabilities” still need to be further clarified in judicial practice，Avoid ambiguity。Including the conversion of properties of different bet365 bonus bets providers in application scenarios，Also includes strengthening the effective connection between the hierarchical and classified management system and algorithm content, as well as dynamic adjustment management, etc.。This should be the innovation space left by the legislation for further expansion of the judiciary。

On the hierarchical management of judicial protection objects，The "Regulations" are aimed at minors、Elderly、Labor、bet365 bonus bets provider that provides services to consumers and other entities，Made more targeted and specific specifications。Emphasis on minors to avoid the inducement of algorithm recommendation services，Focus on the safety and convenience of algorithm recommendation services for the elderly。How to develop products suitable for minors、Model of algorithm recommendation services used by the elderly and other main groups？The Hangzhou Internet Court made a pioneering exploration of a public welfare case involving the infringement of minors’ online rights and interests by an App。Under trial，The court found that the app was collecting、Storage、Use、In the process of sharing personal information and so on，There may be designs that endanger the personal information rights and privacy rights of many unspecified minors in society。Therefore, the platform is not only ordered to compensate for the loss of social and public interests、Apologise，Also urged him to block it、Disconnect the privacy bet365 bonus bets involving minors and other series of rectification tasks。At the same time，Take the lead in promoting the establishment of a public welfare fund for minors’ Internet protection, etc.，Provide a judicial system basis for strengthening the protection of algorithm recommendation services for minors。The scale of underage netizens is huge，It is of great significance to protect the personal safety and tranquility of minors。We can see from the above cases，It is necessary to further tighten the algorithm’s collection and use of minors’ information，Building a special review and human, financial and material protection mechanism for algorithm recommendation services involving minors，Effectively establish legislative protection for algorithmic governance involving minors。

　　Adhere to the number-bet365 bonus bets-driven concept

Moving towards networking、Digital、In the new pattern of intelligent society，Algorithms will become an important factor influencing people’s ideological decisions and shaping social concepts。This "Regulations" sets an "algorithm gatekeeper" duty of care and user rights protection for bet365 bonus bets providers，Algorithm recommendation technology、Information content management、Recommended page display、Specific user objects, etc.，Proposed three-dimensional control requirements。But in addition to the "Regulations", it also strengthens regulations at the level of establishing rules and regulations，It is also necessary to highlight the pursuit of the value of “digital rights” in the digital age in the governance of judicial rules，By reasonably empowering users，Realize social welfare、Dynamic legal interest balance between technological innovation and user rights。

For example, the level of protection of digital human rights and the balance of legal interests。From the perspective of judicial practice，Some takeaway platforms are distributing orders、Remuneration composition and payment、Working hours、Reward and punishment algorithms are being designed，There is an excessive pursuit of food delivery efficiency to satisfy its own economic benefits and user rights，To a certain extent, it ignores digital human rights issues such as the protection of workers’ rights and interests of “delivery boys”。Another example is the issue of algorithmic recommendation services behind the platform’s right to operate independently and users’ right to make independent choices。The first retrieval service dispute case between a consumer and an e-commerce platform heard by the Hangzhou Internet Court，Determined that e-commerce platform search services can be lower than search engine standards in terms of “exact matching”。This fully considers consumers’ dependence on platform recommendation results and strictly examines the rationality of the retrieval bet365 bonus bets，Also respect the platform’s right to operate independently。

The "Regulations" system gives users the right to choose、Right to know、The right to obtain explanations and remedies throughout the entire operation cycle of the bet365 bonus bets system，The legal mechanism allows individuals to fight algorithmic control through "number rights"，But the forms of public participation can be more diverse。In addition to the current provisions，You can consider trying to embed a social review mechanism and an expert technical ethics review mechanism，Create opportunities for the public to effectively participate in the deployment of platform algorithm systems、Evaluate the consequences of using algorithms，Promote the continuous optimization of platform algorithm architecture based on public value orientation。

(The author is the Party Secretary of bet365 bonus bets、Dean)