June 2020，Zhang Genghua's "The Truth of History" was published by Oriental Press。The book was published by Fudan University Press in 2004 with the name "Introduction to History Philosophy" in 2004，Launched its additional book in October 2009。Compared to the first two editions，This edition has made a lot of supplementation and revision。Among them, the third、4、Five chapters all have a section of supplement，There are also some adjustment of the text fields.。other，Correct some of the mistakes of the first two editions，Booking a positive word、Own errors and irregular places in annotations。

The book is positioned as an entry book of a historic theory。As a beginner's "One Door and Step"，The whole book has a strong sense of scene。For example, in "The Moon Problem of History"，The usual bet365 live casino games view of historians is: historical facts are objective，It exists outside the historian and is not affected by it。Historical facts in a direct way to store in historical materials，Historians only need to follow certain rules and procedures，can get historical facts。Since the emergence of history，This becomes a common sense。This common sense has been suffered by many historians、Criticism by historic philosophers。Where，American historian Karl Becker's criticism is the most representative。He believes that historical facts are not out of contours like bricks，You can measure weight，Some kind of hard、Cold Bingbing。"These disappearing objective facts are replaced by the dim reflection and blurred concept of them，And these can't touch、Dark and blurred reflection and impression are all things left by real events that have happened。"The author quotes British historian Edward Carl、French philosopher Raymond Bet365 lotto review Alon、British philosopher Mike Oak Shaart、Similar views of Haiden White in the postmodern flag of the United States，It is obtained to make the original there is no doubt、Historical facts that are taken for granted，The conclusion of the "Moon Problem" in the historical field became an unpredictable "moon problem"。Moon Question is a metaphor for professors at Cornell University in the United States，means that the moon is when no one looks at it，It does not exist。

Common sense，Historical theoretical monographs quoting historical materials will not be too much，Most of the theory and theory，and this book is different。The author wrote in the "Introduction": "This book is a kind of door and ladder for beginners as beginners，It is necessary to let readers understand some basic perspectives of the academic controversy and controversy in the art，For this，This book is in the text or note，quoted the relevant discussions of many scholars and some bet365 Play online games wonderful assertions，Quotation of the original book as much as possible，and indicate the source or source，Reader according to the picture，You can further read many classic works and papers in this field。"" In the 1920s and 1940s，There is a small climax in Chinese historical theory research，Many historical Introduction、Historically -scientific theory works have been released in succession。Here，The author has a note，Publishing time in the note，From Cao Zuoxi's "Theory of History" in 1909 to Liu Jie's "History Theory"，List 26 reference books。Such examples are endless in the book。other，The book closely combines the theory of history with the practice of history。Careful people can find，Examples not only come from professional letters，It also comes from newspapers such as "Wen Wei Po", "China Reading News", "Reference News"。The source of these materials show that beginners should read more newspapers。Materials Bet365 app download everywhere，The author’s good intentions are visible here。other，A basic reading and reference book are attached behind the book，Beginners can also "enter the room"。

The theory of historical hierarchy began in Liu Jie in the first half of the 20th century、Lei Haizong and other scholars，Topic research began in Liu Zehua, who started in the mid -1980s、He Zhaowu，And the author here，The intention to discuss it more delicate。The author thinks，History is an extremely complicated discipline，Almost all the cognitive forms and knowledge varieties。Therefore，It can divide history into four layers: the first layer，Confirmation of historical facts; the second layer，Understanding of historical events; third layer，Summary of historical laws; fourth layer，Evaluation of historical significance。Different levels have different discipline attributes。If the historic is not stratified，Instead of discussing the nature Bet365 lotto review of history、Objective and other questions，will lead to partial general，It is easy to misunderstand the problem。

The author’s point of view is，Only layers can you understand the progress of academic problems，Only on this basis can further promote academic development。This research method is applicable to discussions on many academic issues today，History assumptions in the text is just one example。As for how to discuss the historical theoretical issues more in depth in layers，Then readers need to read and figure out carefully，。

　Bet365 lotto review