Gadamer's "Truth and Method" (1960).，Many Western scholars have a micro -word about the book: determine that Gadimer opposes the truth and the method，Choose the truth and abandon the method (Like、H. Turk); Burner claims that Gadamol's book tells "truth and non -method"; Lico even recommends，"Truth and Method" is more appropriate if it is changed to "Truth or Method";，Gadamer's title is intended to create a "humorous atmosphere"，He actually believes that "there will be no way to explain the existence of the methodology of the methodology of the text"，So etc.。

Comparison of comparison，Most of Chinese scholars agree with Gadmer's ontological interpretation.。According to Palmer's statement，Modern interpretation has three classics: Wakhr's "understanding"、Betty's "The theory of General Explanation as Psychiatric Methodology" and Gadamer's "Truth and Method"。but，So far, only "Truth and Method" has published Chinese translations，The other two methodology traditions interpreted classic classics and lack of people asking。I used to explain this situation with "the nostalgia of the Chinese"，But think about it，Gadamer's philosophical interpretation of philosophy based on understanding the change of body theory，"Xuan" is novel and persuasive，It is the deep reason that it can be popular in China。Emphasize understanding the subject、Personal chest expression，All of them have been given some reasonableness，Compared to adhering to the methodology traditional pursuit of scriptures、Haoshou Sutra can be able to speak Scripture，I don’bet365 best casino games t know how interesting。

　　Bet365 app download

An interpretation of ontology The academics can rise in the contemporary Chinese academic community，Naturally, there is a rational and advantage that cannot be ignored theoretically。but，This does not mean，Method Theory interpretation can be abandoned like。Just the opposite，Method Theory Tradition has always been the mainstream of interpretation in the West，and the interpretation of this body theory is not generally accepted by the academic community。This point，We can also get evidence from the criticism of Gadamore from Contemporary Methodology.。

We should treat methodology and ontology as two components of complementarity in interpretation。As we see，Western interpretation scholars' criticism based on methodological thinking，or Chinese scholars do the opposite，The interpretation concept of Zhang Yang's body theory dilutes methodology，Both the theoretical position of the opposite side of the opposite of the interpretation concept。In fact，The real advantage of the interpretation of practical philosophy，It is the complementary of the methodology and the body theory。Words，It is this kind of complementarity that can realize the practical function of interpretation of the dual sense of learning，that is: the practice of thinking (acting through the thinking activity of the subject to the spiritual world) and the practice of active activities as the subject (the power of thinking is acting through the subject of the subject)。

"Understanding and Method: Interpretation of the Methodology in the Academic Visiting" (Niu Wenjun，People's Publishing House, September 2022 Edition) One book，View its title，It is easy for readers to think of Gadmer's "bet365 live casino games Truth and Method"。The two do exist in a certain meaning association，But the thinking of "understanding and method"，Not simply follow the position of traditional methodology interpretation，Instead, it is committed to viewing the methodology and ontology of interpretation in a broader field of vision，Explore the issue of the relationship between "understanding" and "method"。The author puts this problem in the interpretation of the relationship between the interpretation and the entire modern scientific methodology relationship，Clarify the connection between the two、tension and conflict，Based on this re -positioning interpretation，Special is rare。In this perspective，Interpretation in humanities science、The role of the foundation of psychiatric science，It can be prominent; the interpretation of traditional differences and fusion in ancient and modern Chinese and Western interpretation，and the future direction of interpretation of the development of academic development caused by this，presented in front of the world with a new look。

　　Understand and interpretation of the meaning of generating

Western interpretation academia criticized Gadelmer to abandon or even oppose methodology，Relativeism of understanding，Several conclusions。but，The author of the book defends Gadmer，and excavate its inner methodology orientation。Gadamer founded the interpretation of the body theory，Naturally, in terms of explaining and understanding this body theory，But he did not give up methodology。In the argument with Betty，Gadamer's clear statement，He does not deny the significance of interpretation methodology。In the second edition of "Truth and Method"，He also deliberately shows his methodology: "My book bet365 Play online games is based on methodology，There is no doubt about this。”

There is an opinion in the Chinese academic community，I believe that Gadamer's interpretation uses the two methods of phenomenology and dialectics。Faculture，This is also possible。The book attempts to provide a more convincing insight: "Gadamol does not directly transplant the method of phenomenology into the interpretation，He weakened and even canceled Husserl's phenomenology intuitive method，He does not seek to be given sex at the beginning，The front structure of understanding exactly indicates，The manifestation of the matter itself cannot reach that kind of original being given，but an effect historical event。"" What was given in the original intuition，"Things itself" in the process of understanding is not the same thing。can also be seen from it，Methods of phenomenology and interpretation method based on phenomenology，Not the same method。Interpretation method，is a "inner method"。

"Workers want to be good，must first benefit its instrument。"Tools in your hand、Applicable method，Is a prerequisite for success。For the "things" as the purpose，"Device" is external、Tools that can act on "things"，It can be called "external method"。This method often has the meaning of external and formality。But，The "method" of this understanding cannot accurately portray the interpretation method。Compared to the external method，Hegel is called "inner method"，where Gadamol，Convert into a "interpretation method"。According to Hegel，This method "Not an external form，but the soul and concept of the content "。Here，Methods and content for a while。The goal of understanding and interpretation is meaning。This is not Bet365 lotto review to say，Significance has existed in a business，It has to show the world through understanding and interpretation;，The process of understanding and interpretation is the process of meaning of meaning。

　　Chinese interpretation of traditional based on value and practice

The book's trial on "Classic and Classic Consciousness" in the book，Working on the basis of previous discussion: not only clarifying the two meanings contained in the German "Klassisch", that is, "Classical" (classic) and "classic" (classic) Differential，It also pointed out the nature and scale of "classical" lies in "classic"，"Classic" marks the unity of historic and standardized。Because of this，"Klassisch" should be translated as "classic" in most contexts。In short，"Classical" is an ancient classics，But not all ancient classics belong to the classic，Only in history and continue to play a social standard role can be called a classic。That's for this，The classic laurel must be awarded by future generations。The most convincing evidence is the Six Classics。Although the Liu Jing has already existed，But before Confucius deletes poems，Unknown is "Jing"，Even the name of "Sutra"。After Confucius，Fang has the name of the Six Classics，Started in "Zhuangzi · Tianyun"。，Books in the name of "Scripture" repeatedly increased and deleted，Western Han Dynasty，Six Classics only stores five classics，From the Eastern Han Dynasty to the Seven Classics，The Tang Dynasty increased to the twelve classics，The Song Dynasty has reached the Thirteen Classics。

Examine this process，We are not difficult to make such a conclusion: the Chinese culture tradition always contains some unique classic consciousness -the necessity of classics and the clear consciousness of classics。Is this consciousness bet365 Play online games unique? Is there no such consciousness in Western interpretation of tradition?，Of course, there are classic consciousness in the Western interpretation tradition，and have been kept in the study of the study。As an interpretation of the discipline,，This consciousness is interrupted in modern interpretation。In the theory of understanding the theory of the founder of the founder of the modern interpretation,，Classic has been replaced by text concepts，Although he is used as an example of an explanation example, he is taken from the classic。The reason why his general interpretation science is called "general"，The most important symbol is to expand the interpretable object from the Bible to the language nature in the general sense。In contemporary，This concept is even given a generalized demand: all texts are "equal"，It is equal to everyone's life。but，If we seriously reflect on our reading experience，Who will agree that all works are "equal"? Skill the skills contained in the work、Realm、The difference between value，Classic classic is regarded as a pan -，Isn’t it unequal to classic、Is it unfair? Classic is the crystallization of the spirit of the times，Contains the historical memory of a nation，It also contains our concept of the future。If we have disappeared for the classic scenery，Humans no longer have hope。

I think，Chinese interpretation of traditional concepts of attention，It is precisely because it is based on the value of interpretation、Practical orientation。This is not to say，Western modern and contemporary interpretation has no value about value、Ethical thinking; we can understand this，When they talk about ethics，The main point is not the normative of interpretation。Just in a very weak sense -for Bet365 lotto review example, requiring the interpreter must have the sincerity of understanding，For the dialogue, it can be carried out smoothly -it can be regarded as the ethical specifications of interpretation activities。

　(Author Unit: The Department of Philosophy of East China Normal University and "China Interpretation" Shanghai Social Science Innovation Research Base)