Since modern times，With Western Xue East，Western logic, especially formal logic, is introduced to my country by the system。Due to Yin Ming's three -story argument and Aristotle's three paragraphs of the three paragraphs of similarity，Therefore, the question of how to explain the "similarity" and "differences" of the two in the Ming Dynasty for a century，It has launched a wide and in -depth continuous discussion，A scene of "Hundred Flowers" formed。

　　Bet365 app download

About the relationship between the three discussions and the three paragraphs，A view that the two are similar，Although they are different in the order of premise and conclusions，But the essence is the same，All belong to the deductive reason from general to special interpretation，and the three -story formula is essentially equivalent to the first AAA and EAE type。Although the three discussions have more examples，But it basically does not work in reasoning，Can be ignored。A view that the two are slightly different，Although they are all interpretation logic，But from the proposition、word item、Processing object、Judgment Standard、Reasoning process and other angles，They do not include each other、two independent forms of reasoning。These two views can be summarized as "similar theory" or "interpretation theory"。There is another view that the two are different，Three -branch argument is the form of argument，instead of inference form。Specifically，Some scholars think it is a dialogue mode，And some scholars think it is a question of giving the discussion，Then look for the "retrospective" form of the "traceable" for it for it。Another view that the three discussions are inductive reasoning，bet365 Play online games The general proposition in its premise is obtained by summarizing the example part，Examples are demonstrating、Reason plays a very important role。From this point of view, there are two kinds of opinions: one thinks that the examples can be completely，So the nature of the three discussions is completely summarized，is a form of interpretation and induction; another considers that the example is not fully induced，So the nature of the three discussions is incomplete。

The argument about the above issues of the academic community has led to a series of related issues.，No sincerity is。For example, about the positioning of Chen Na Yinming and even the entire Yinming。A view that Western logic is the basic rule that everyone has followed by everyone's thinking，It is similar to the self -comparison of Yinming，But the ratio of the reason that the reasoning is based on the reason for him and the reason for him。(For the comparison of self -comparison and the amount for him，Series for explicit term。Buddhist logicians divide the ratio as a self -comparison quantity and the ratio of him。Inner push for the comparison of the self -comparison，Its function is self -enlightenment;，Its role is to enlighten him。) A view of two peaks as a Buddhist logic，Chen Na Yinming and the law called Yinming，The former laid the foundation for the logic of Buddhism，The latter finally enables Buddhist logic to complete the leap from analogy to interpretation，Make the argumentation of the demonstration to the three sections of Western logic。Another point of view is from the development of the cause and the research content angle from the Buddhist family，It is pointed out that because it is not a synonym for logic，but a dialogue theory based on daily theory as a research object。There is also a view from the angle of the informal logic，pointing out that Buddhist logic theory is a program about debate，Bet365 lotto review Is an argument，instead of inference，with obvious psychological factors，It is "Research on Practice"，Chen Nainming is no exception。They advocate returning to Yinming as a Buddhist theory debate，Return to daily practice demonstration。

　　Yin Ming is a unique academic form

Exploring the above problems and the bottlenecks they encountered，People are becoming more and more realized that because they are not only logical or arguments,，Instead of logic、Debate and quantitative theory (knowledge theory) unique science in one body。In Yinming，Discuss how to get possible、How to get knowledge，How to start with wisdom。The core of the discussion on the discussion is Li、Break and negligence and other problems，The purpose is to teach。So，Debate Care、The place and environment of the enemy's argument; the rules that care about argument and the rules that must be followed together、agreed, etc.。Compared with，Logic is more concerned about the form of thought、The general rules of the structure，Follow reason，Especially the launching relationship between the premise and conclusion。So，Debate、Logic and quantitative theory has its own relatively independent research category，Can't mix it。At the same time，They are interconnected: logic is often used in arguments，This is particularly obvious in the new cause; and due to the argument in the Ming Dynasty, there is religious liberation and affection，Related discussions mostly focus on quantitative theory。

For the unique academic form of Yin Ming，Whether it is only regarded it as an epistemology，Still logic，or argument，There are biased bias。But if you don’t give it roughly,，Blindly compared with a certain discipline、Research，It is also not desirable。For a century，Study on Western logic research because of the frustration encountered by Ming is the best explanation。Compare bet365 best casino games the three theories with the three -stage theory，Its essence is to compare arguments and logic。The three -branch argument is the form of argument in the disconnection，belongs to the category of argument; three paragraphs are typical inference forms，belongs to the logic category。Compare two types of different areas for comparison research，In addition to it is not easy to see the essence of the problem，There will also be some pseudo -problems。For example，The "Chen Na Yinming Tong、Whether the foreign product has to get rid of the ancestors "。The academic community argued for decades，Still no conclusion。But if this problem is placed on the relative independent framework of logic and argument, it will be seen，But you can't know it anymore。The so -called division has laws，is when the argument is argued to the enemy's argument，He can’t use the topic as an argument，Because the topic is the focus of the dispute between the enemy。So，"Except the Law" is a very important rule for the explanatory argument (or three discussions)。On the contrary，The concept of the same product and foreign product，Purely Chen Na defined in order to give a set of general methods to give a set of discussions and the relationship between the law of the law，It is a pure logic concept。Judging from the objects discussed and the method of analyzing problems，The same product and foreign products are forms of form，Full of logical research paradigm。So，The same product、Foreign products have nothing to do with the law，and "Chen Na Yinming Tong、Whether the foreign product has to get rid of the ancestors "itself is a pseudo question。Another example，The relationship between bet365 Play online games The general proposition in the metaphor of the metaphor is also a false question。If not，How can it be a common relationship between them from the two attributes of specific things? Specifically，The bet365 live casino games argument "Zong: impermanence。Reason: What is the reason for what is。Same metaphors: All do it，such as bottle, etc.。The two traits of "what" and "impermanence" from the bottle and other things，Why can we get the common relationship between the two between the two? Actually，This is impossible。For this，Due to the category (or dilemma) of the Mingzhong Zhongzhong, this is a lot of reflection in this area。It is because of the general method that cannot give a set of internal relationships between any two concepts，So Chen Na can make a different approach，From the level of abstract concept，Start from the perspective of sentence structure analysis，This is the way of thinking used by logic。In other words，The general propositions in the metaphor are not obtained by summarizing the example part，Instead, it is obtained through the logical method。

　　Be careful of introducing Western logic research methods

Looking back on the 100 -year -old research process，From Western logic (including modern logic), was introduced into Yingming research，There are three sounds: the first category is welcome、Optical attitude。They think Western logic methods are very mature、Full results and widely used，Therefore, it is believed that it will have some actions in Yingming research。The second category is to think of it as a flood beast and blindly refuse，Scholars holding this attitude account for a minority in the academic community。The third category is holding a cautious attitude，Neither blindly refuse，Not blindly optimistic。The main basis is that because the Ming and Western logic is two different forms of learning，Because it is not all logic in the Ming Dynasty，Blindly transforming into a pure form of deduction due to Ming，It will lead to the loss of their own characteristics due to Mingming。The author believes that being cautious about the method of studying in Western logic is desirable，Pay attention to two aspects bet365 live casino games of introducing Western logic research methods。

First，Pay attention to the content、Objects and methods、Differences of tools。Yin Ming is the object of our research，Western logic is our introduction to study Yinming's perspective、Method、Tool，This relationship cannot be blurred，Not to be inverted in the end。Positioning issues are important，This directly determines the direction of the reason why the research is correct。Western logic is just a tool、Method，Can help us better understand Yin Ming，instead of transforming it into some kind of Western logic。For example，When we use Western logic to sort out、Understanding、Research on the epistemology of Yinming，I have to pay attention to the origin of the epistemology of the Mahayana Yoga faction，I have to pay attention to its preset，That is "all consciousness"，This is different from Western logic。Western logic is based on the two points of the objective world and the subjective world，I believe that there is a corresponding relationship between the two，This relationship logically uses "true、Fake "，That is the concept of "True Value" to discuss。Western logic is concerned about those sentences with real values，that is "proposition"，Based on this basis、Construction System。This is to pay attention when studying the cause，Can't use it for granted，Full of the presets of the two of them。，Use the Eulertu method to understand the theory of nine sentences，It should be noted that an Eurast's preset is "concept cannot be empty concept"，That is, the concept must have an extension。But the cause of the cause can be the concept of emptiness。If you don't notice this，It is easy to get eight causes，Not nine sentences。

Next，Pay attention to the uniqueness of Yin Ming。Yin Ming is a clinic of epistemology、Debate、Logic，Even psychology and other fields of learning。On the one hand, we must bet365 best casino games make a rough distinction to it，This is only conducive to the discussion of specific issues。If you want to sort out the logical thoughts of the Ming Dynasty，If you have to pick the relevant logic part from the Ming Dynasty literature, it is necessary to pick it out，Otherwise, it will not be able to understand its logic objectively and accurately。On the other hand, you cannot cut contact between various fields。If the logic and argument in the Ming Dynasty are split，Can't understand what the argument is five -branch or three -branch forms，I can’t understand why it is basically shaped after Chen Chen.。

　　(This article is the special "under the perspective of modern logic view" (19vjx130) in the National Social Science Fund

(Author Unit: Institute of Religious Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)