The difference bet365 horse racing odds is the most controversial concept in Rawls’s theory of justice，Since the publication of A Theory of Justice，Questions and challenges from different positions arise one after another。The author thinks，Most of these doubts are based on misunderstanding the connotation of Rawls’ difference bet365 horse racing odds。Therefore，It is necessary to reorganize the basic connotation and theoretical structure of Rawls’ difference bet365 horse racing odds，This is the key to understanding Rawls’ theory of justice。

Without a doubt，The essence of Rawls’ theory of justice is expressed through two principles of justice: the first bet365 horse racing odds，Everyone shall have an equal right to a similar system of liberties compatible with the most extensive system of fundamental liberties enjoyed by all。Second bet365 horse racing odds，Social and economic inequality should be arranged in this way，Making them (1) conducive to the greatest good of the least favored；And (2) positions and positions are open to everyone。Among them，The first bet365 horse racing odds is often referred to as the bet365 horse racing odds of equal freedom，The second bet365 horse racing odds consists of two parts，Respectively known as the difference bet365 horse racing odds and the bet365 horse racing odds of equal opportunity。It is important to point out that，Although the difference bet365 horse racing odds is advancing in a "natural way"，There have been three expressions with different content and focus - in Section 11 of "A Theory of Justice"，In the general concept of justice, the second bet365 horse racing odds is expressed as: social and economic inequality should be arranged in this way，Let them (1) be reasonably expected to be suitable to the interests of everyone；And (2) positions and positions are open to all。To Section 13，This expression has changed，Among them，The expression "reasonably expected to be in the interest of everyone" becomes "(1) the greatest interest of the least favored"。To Section 46，Rawls’s final formulation of the two principles of justice has not undergone any new changes—but the ideological connotation they express is consistent，Meet the greatest interests of the least beneficiaries。

As everyone knows，Rawls constructed the theory of justice within the framework of social cooperation。He thinks，“The intuitive idea is that everyone’s happiness depends on the system of social cooperation，There is no such social cooperation，It is impossible for everyone to live a satisfactory life。Therefore the division of interests should enable everyone to voluntarily join the cooperation system，Including those who are worse off”。In his opinion，The two principles of justice provide a fair basis for social cooperation。He said: "Based on it，Those with better talents、People with higher social status，Can expect when a workable system is a necessary condition for happiness for all，Others will also voluntarily join this system。”For ease of understanding，We reduce Rawls’s inference logic on social cooperation as follows: (a) The happiness of every social member depends on the social cooperation system；(b) In social cooperation，The bet365 horse racing odds of interest division should enable everyone (the lucky and the unfortunate) to voluntarily participate in social cooperation；(c) The two principles of justice, including the difference bet365 horse racing odds, provide a fair basis for social cooperation，For both the lucky and the unlucky，They will all be willing to participate in social cooperation。

Specifically，In a theory of justice as fairness，The difference bet365 horse racing odds is proposed based on the following considerations: on the premise that individual equal freedom and equal opportunities are fully guaranteed，If there is an unequal distribution, it can make everyone better off，Then，Is this unequal distribution just?？Without a doubt，Rawls gave an affirmative answer，As he said: "If there is an inequality in the basic structure of society that makes everyone better off than initially equal，Why not allow this inequality？”Rawls believed in the plurality of goals of social cooperation，Therefore, the principles of justice applied to the basic structure of society must take efficiency into account、Cooperation and stability。He thinks，“We may grasp a conception of justice simply through its role in distribution，However useful this effect may be in discerning the concept of justice。We must consider its broader connections...all else being equal，One conception of justice is preferable to another because its broader consequences are preferable”。In other words，In Rawls’ view，A just society is certainly desirable，But a just and efficient society is more worthy of people’s yearning。

Therefore，In the general view of justice，Rawls believes，When the basic freedom of individual equality is guaranteed，If socioeconomic inequality could benefit everyone，Then，This kind of inequality is just，This also became the first expression of the difference bet365 horse racing odds。To avoid possible ambiguities about “everyone’s interests”，Preventing extreme inequality caused by socioeconomic inequality，Highlight the constraints of the difference bet365 horse racing odds "Pareto Optimality"，Rawls further refined the expression of the difference bet365 horse racing odds and finally determined it as: socioeconomic inequality should be conducive to the greatest interests of the least benefited。Specifically，Under the conditions of background justice and procedural justice，If the system allows those individuals who are better off to benefit from socioeconomic inequality，Then the premise is that it must be in the greatest interest of the least benefited。In Rawls’ view，As long as the above conditions are met，This kind of inequality is acceptable for efficiency reasons，Therefore also just。

When expressing the difference bet365 horse racing odds，Rawls spared no effort to draw everyone’s attention to the following issues: 1，The difference bet365 horse racing odds mainly applies to the basic structure of society。He said，“The basic structure of society has two coordinated roles，The first bet365 horse racing odds applies to the first function，The second bet365 horse racing odds applies to another function。In the first function，The basic structure provides for and ensures that every citizen has equal basic freedoms，And establish a just constitutional government。In another function，It provides the background system of social and economic justice that is most appropriate for free and equal citizens”。The two principles of justice are applied as a whole to the basic structure of society，And function in harmony。Part 2，The difference bet365 horse racing odds is only a narrow distribution bet365 horse racing odds that operates within a set of background institutions。In A Theory of Justice，There is a "lexicographic" ordering between the two principles of justice，The first bet365 horse racing odds takes precedence over the second bet365 horse racing odds；In the Second bet365 horse racing odds，The bet365 horse racing odds of equal opportunity takes precedence over the bet365 horse racing odds of difference。The so-called priority here，Not just a sequential priority，And it is a general spiritual influence and guidance。Therefore，The difference bet365 horse racing odds can only work if the bet365 horse racing odds of equal freedom and the bet365 horse racing odds of equal opportunity are met，As Rawls said: "This priority means，When applying a bet365 horse racing odds (or testing it against a test sample)，We should assume that the prior bet365 horse racing odds should be fully satisfied。What we seek are distributive principles (narrow sense) that operate within a set of background institutions，This background system not only ensures basic equal freedom，Also ensures fair equality of opportunity。”If we break away from the prior background bet365 horse racing odds and only consider itself，So according to Rawls，The difference bet365 horse racing odds is not taken seriously。Third，The difference bet365 horse racing odds expresses at the deepest level an idea of ​​reciprocity。In justice as fairness，Mutuality is between impartiality and mutual advantage，It is a relationship between citizens expressed by the principles of justice that regulate society。

In short，The difference bet365 horse racing odds must be in the background system，That is, a redistribution bet365 horse racing odds that plays a role in everyone having equal freedom and equal opportunities，This is determined by the theoretical framework of the difference bet365 horse racing odds。Therefore，It is neither a bet365 horse racing odds of compensation，It is not a distribution bet365 horse racing odds that infringes on the self-ownership of others，It is a bet365 horse racing odds that expresses and embodies the concept of mutuality at the deepest level。

　　(Author’s unit: Party School of Zhuhai Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China)