Professor Zhang Jiang's "Explanation Theory (Outline)" (hereinafter referred to as "Outline") is to combine interpretation and knowledge theory。This idea is very creative，I walked out of a new way to interpret research。I once said，Now we only have philosophy historians，No philosopher。This sounds sounding a bit，But there really is such a problem，Scholars generally lack creativity，Most accustomed to doing introduction，Therefore, there are really few scholars who have their own independent ideological system and can be recognized by everyone。

　bet365 Play online games  

Speaking from the history of philosophy，Explanation has experienced several development stages，Including interpretation of text，such as the Bible、Interpretation of Historical Text; Interpretation of Methodology，How can the "psychiatric science possible" that Dilai is studying; philosophical interpretation，Gadamer's opposition is limited to the methodology level，Practicing the interpretation to the level of philosophy。They have formed a set of interpretation of discourse，But there is no intersection with British and American knowledge。As far as British and American analysis knowledge is concerned，It forms its own knowledge -based knowledge -based knowledge theory system。bet365 best casino games As far as these two systems are concerned，They all face some common problems that need to be explained，The nature of knowledge、Elements、How to get the results of "True"，How to confirm，etc.。

An problem left by the interpretation or an unfinished place is，Since the meaning can be regarded as a constant understanding and interpretation，So what is its "truth"? Gadamore's "Truth and Method" book，Opposition will be limited to the scope of methodology，and treat its ideological principles as a truth。But what is ironic is，I can't find what the truth is in his book、How to get the discussion of truth。

Professor Zhang Jiang tried to combine interpretation and knowledge theory，One of the claims contained in is psychiatric science knowledge with truth。This is a very worthy work。In his "outline"，The following method is an example of a combination: "The subject of consciousness starts with the general cognition and restraint of public rationality，Independent opinions that produce beyond public rationality，Certificate of reasonable self -consistent，Delivery public rational test。Test as a real person，Advanced is knowledge，Leading human rational progress。"" Here is an interpretation thing (such as "" Independent Opinions of Production Begamed Beyond Public Reassessment ")，There is an element of knowledge theory (such as "Test as the True，Advanced Knowledge ")。

Explanation was originally a tradition of ancient Chinese philosophy，Everyone knows the "Six Classic Bet365 app download Note Me、I Note the Six Classics，This point is reflected。But unfortunately，In the past, only the practice of interpretation，but failed to rise to the theory。Interpretation theory proposed by Professor Zhang Jiang，It can be regarded as the effort to make modern answers to this traditional question。

　　Innovation of interpretation theory 

The basic purpose of "outline" is to seek combination of interpretation and knowledge theory，Form a unified interpretation theory，Therefore, the fundamental problem faced is: how to explain how to combine with the knowledge of objectivity; or，How can the interpretation of subjectivity achieve objectivity and truth? This is undoubtedly a big challenge in theory。Generally speaking，"Outline" proposed a creative framework，And the author has previously discussed in some papers。Here，I think this framework has a highlights of innovation and can be attributed to the following。

The first is to advocate that "psychiatry knowledge is objective knowledge"，and try to explain how it can be like this，This table is now "Once the knowledge is produced，Naturally out of the production subject，Independent existence of human subject consciousness in an objective form "(Outline 3)。This explanation is very new，There is no lack of reasonableness。Because even psychiatric science knowledge，After it is produced by the subject，It is independent of the subject，The ideological object similar to the "World 3" pattern similar to Poper's sense。

Bet365 lotto review Second, try to explain how psychological science knowledge can be "true" question。"Outline" explanation is "resorting to history，In the overall historical process，Repeated knowledge of knowledge，Trust can be true "。Production of this passage with the "independent opinions" above，and "Test as True，Advanced Knowledge "linked，It is not difficult to find that it contains psychiatry knowledge from "independent opinions"，to "Test" and "Trust Is True"，Then to the three stages of "Advanced Knowledge"。Opinions talked about with knowledge theory、Belief、Knowledge three links coincide。

Three is related to this，Positive knowledge production and public space of psychiatric science、Public rational relationship，It is believed that "the production of psychiatric knowledge is expanded in public space"，It takes "the general cognition and constraint of public rationality as the starting point"，Taking the test of public rationality as the end，Test its true and false from public rationality。This is the above psychiatric knowledge.、Real，How to from independence、Trust is the proposition of true to advanced knowledge，Open a demonstration idea，is through public space、Test of public rationality to achieve。This gives "knowledge" to "knowledge" to give its own explanation。This is different from Kant，The latter is full of subjective reasons and objective reasons，As a judgment standard for three cognitive forms。In addition，"Outline" Bet365 lotto review also proposed "Repeated Knowledge Repeat，Trust can be true "，This further proposes the problem of "trust" or "believe"，Based on the "repeated appearance" of reasonable knowledge。This is also a very new saying，Can be a family say。

　Questions worth thinking about 

As a discussion，I want to further achieve self -consistentness on the "outline"，Raiders the following issues that are worth thinking about or view。

Outline 1 thinks，"Natural Science solve the problem of psychiatric science in effective methods"。What is this method，Is it an interpretation method? in the case of，Explanation method is an effective method of natural science? if not，What is this method，What does it have to do with the interpretation method? If "the integration of natural science and psychiatric science has been settled" (Outline 1)，So this integration should also include the integration of method。If this is the case，So you should answer what this effective way is。

Outline 2 thinks，"Psychiatric science and natural science are not opposite"。The interpretation of methodology regards them as opposition，At least there are obvious differences。Natural science grasp the facts，Psychiatric science grasps meaning。If psychiatric science and natural science are regarded as not opposite，So where are they in common?

"Psychological Science Knowledge，Classification as factual knowledge and value knowledge。Spiritual cognitive activities can be divided into factual Bet365 lotto review authentication and value certification。"" This involves the problem of the object of psychiatry。The factual knowledge of psychiatric science refers to what kind of "facts"，It is a text like "Culture History and Philosophy"，still includes economics、Sociology and the like? also，How does spiritual science knowledge be authenticated? If the interpretation of this kind of knowledge is performed by "trusting it true"，So is this self -consistent with factual authentication?

Outline 5 proposes，"Explanation is the only way to produce psychological science"。Is this so? At least one problem that will face is，How to view the "description" method? Husserl、Wittgenstein、The philosophy of the three of Heidegger，But one thing is the same，They all claim that they use the "description" method，The purpose is to indicate that your philosophy is objective。

Outline 8 said，"Pinity of Psychiatric Science Knowledge Refined to the Pental Cognition under the Public Causes Bouncing。Psychiatric knowledge provides reasonable beliefs for human beings。Eventually the human spirit and material practice test is true "。The problem here is，How can "multiple cognition" be tested as one yuan? also，Psychiatric knowledge "In the end," the test by human spirit and material practice is true "，and "Repeat the Repeated Knowledge，Can the Trust of Trust be true? "，It seems that there is no need to accept it through "trust"。

　(The author is a professor at the Department of Philosophy at the School of Humanities of Shanghai Jiaotong University)