How is the combination of interpretation and knowledge?
April 25, 2023 09:17 Source: "China Social Sciences", April 25, 2023, Issue 2638 Author: Cao Jianbo

"Explanation theory (Outline)" by Professor Zhang Jiang (hereinafter referred to as "Outline"),After reading more than 10 papers on his interpretation,The author believes that Professor Zhang Jiang's criticism of the compulsory interpretation can be described as the current disadvantages of the interpretation of the academic community today,Suggestions on the construction of Chinese interpretation can be described as high -house building,and his ideas about combining interpretation and knowledge,It is both original and very realistic。

In Outline,Professor Zhang Jiang advocates,An interpretation without justice will inevitably produce relativism、Mysterious Achievement,Even nihilism。So,Reasonable interpretation should be cited by contemporary public rationality,and emphasize the important role of context in the production of psychiatry。For this,I completely agree with the author。Many other insights in the Outline,The author will not comment one by one,The following is the order of "Outline",Choose only for different opinions or needs to be further explained.。

Differences based on interpretation theory and knowledge theory,Professor Zhang Jiang thinks,Psychiatry knowledge and natural scientific knowledge are side -to -town。But,In his opinion,The production of these two scientific knowledge,All need to use rationality (especially public rationality),Both bet365 live casino games the goal of pursuing certainty; coupled,The integration of natural science and psychiatric science has been set ",So,Can explanation theory explain natural scientific knowledge? This idea of ​​unifying natural scientific knowledge and psychiatric science knowledge,Perhaps it can be used as a greater theoretical vision to pursue。

Professor Zhang Jiang thinks,The type of knowledge is more certain、More credible and more correct。He said: "In the process of knowledge generation,Independent producer,Production self -considers compared to others,More certain、More credible knowledge ",and said, "Different cognition of the same phenomenon,is determining the producer self -confidence,Its cognition and judgment are more correct than others "。I agree with Professor Zhang Jiang's understanding of the degree of knowledge,In "Knowledge is absolute,Is it still? ("Philosophy Research" 2022, No. 6) In the article,I oppose the knowledge advocated by the traditional mainstream absolute knowledge theory.,Only the two -value judgment of "knowledge" and "unknown",The degree of knowledge of "Six" knowledge、"Know" the example of daily use and nature demonstration and composition (that is, true、Confirmation and Believe) Research,Provide defense for the degree of knowledge。According to knowledge degree,,The pursuit of knowledge certainty should also be understood degree,And this understanding may change with the change of the context,The best criteria for judging are public rationality。

Professor Zhang Jiang thinks on the one hand,"In the process of knowledge generation,Independent producer,Production self -considers compared to others,More certain、More credible knowledge ",On Bet365 app download the other hand, it is believed that "the subject of consciousness is based on the general cognition and constraints of public rationality,Production ... Independent Opinions,Certificate with reasonable self -consistent,Delivery public rational inspection "。So,How to know the knowledge obtained through individual intuition,What are the knowledge obtained by public rationality? the author thinks,Given that any science is "pursuing truth,Avoid errors "is the target,and the cognitive advantage of the expert community,So,During the continuous reflection balance process,Individual knowledge judgment should be corrected by the public's knowledge,The knowledge of the public must be corrected by the expert's knowledge。

Professor Zhang Jiang thinks,3051_3075。I think,Inspection of authenticity,Putting human spirit and material practice is not very good。It is usually considered,"Practice is the only criterion for testing truth",Theoretical theories tested through practice can sometimes be used as a means of "test" truth。In view of the important role of rationality, especially public rationality in the production and inspection of psychiatric knowledge,Can we consider using broad practice (including scientific practice or objective practice、Theoretical practice or ideological practice) to replace human spirit and material practice?

Professor Zhang Jiang thinks,"Determination of spiritual scientific knowledge,Decisions of the context of knowledge output and derived ",and advocate "Decision of Psychiatric Science Constellation by Context"。Professor bet365 best casino games Zhang Jiang believes that spiritual science knowledge is determined by context,The author also takes it deep。Emphasizing the important role of context in the return of knowledge (that is, affirmation of whether a proposition is a knowledge),is the core point of view of contextual knowledge theory in contemporary mainstream knowledge theory,It is also the proposition that the author has recognized and promoted for more than 20 years。Contextist knowledge Theory thinks,Any knowledge is the context,Knowledge to be affected by the context。Context -based knowledge view,The author does not agree with Professor Zhang Jiang's "conversion context,Facts and value recognition will not change,It is the perspective of unlimited context knowledge。I think,Because the context may be diverse,Even conflict with each other,Therefore, there is no knowledge of infinite context。Professor Zhang Jiang said "conversion context,Fure and value recognition changes,For limited contextual knowledge "may not be established,Because the context changes,The things that were originally considered knowledge may no longer be knowledge。such as,In the interpretation of existentialism,Heidegger's interpretation of Van Gogh's "shoes" will be considered knowledge,In the interpretation of public interpretation,Heidegger's interpretation is no longer knowledge。The context explained is diverse、variable,Therefore, the interpretation conclusion determined by the context is also diverse、variable。Despite this,It can’t be considered that there bet365 best casino games is no good or bad division、The difference between the advantages and disadvantages。From this perspective,The author agrees to Professor Zhang Jiang's "relativity of context,Determination of spiritual science knowledge is relative "。but but,I am worried that someone will watch the concept of contextuality interpretation as an interpretation view of relativity,See the psychiatric scientific knowledge generated as a relativity knowledge。I advocate,Production of determining knowledge due to context,Knowledge is inseparable from context,Therefore, the context factor can be regarded as the inherent of knowledge、Must -inevitable factors。Contextual knowledge theory advocates proposition P's true value in a specific context is absolute。In the context C1,If P is knowledge,So in the context C1,p not only really knowledge,And absolutely real knowledge。In the context C2,If P is knowledge,So in the context C2,Non -p not only really knowledge,And absolutely real knowledge。So,Contextist knowledge theory only advocates that the context cannot be wrong,instead of advocating all the seas of all seas must not be wrong,Not to advocate relativism。Absolutely indispensable knowledge theory proposition,In any context,The reliability of knowledge、Determination is not 10 %、50 %,Not 90 %、99 %,but 100 % absolutely reliable、Absolutely OK。Relators' theory of relativity treats relative context as external、Occascular factors,It is advocated that any proposition is true,No defective perspective。Since those who are returned Bet365 app download are people in real life,It is inevitable to be contextized,Because "all context is equal",The context of the evaluation will not be sensitive,contradictory view of contextism,plus a lot of evidence to indicate,The context will not be completely equal。So,The author opposes the view that "all context is equal",Agree with context unequal theory,Put forward the best principles of Fuyan context。The author advocates when the knowledge is returned,Knowledge in the best return language is the most reasonable、The most worthwhile。During the interpretation,The best interpretation subject is to use public rational interpreters in public spaces; the best interpretation object is the most interpretable object; the best interpretation standard is。Due to context inequality、There are layers,Therefore, the knowledge explained is also extent。Of course,There are layers of differences between the context and unequal,It cannot be said that there is only the best interpretation subject、Explanation objects and interpretation standards have the right to survive,Others must be removed。There are two reasons: one is,The audience of explaining the results is diverse、Contextualization,"Radish cabbage has their own love"; the second is,Due to time and space change,Explanation activity will come back in context,Under the condition of the context of the language,Various different context status may also change。

I think,Professor Zhang Jiang tried to combine the interpretation theory and knowledge theory is feasible,And it is important Bet365 app download for the Chinese discourse system that constructs interpretation,Therefore, it is worthy of vigorously。

 Bet365 app download  

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website Contact: 010-85886809 Address: Building 1, No. 15, House, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026