In order，Professor Zhang Jiang proposed a compulsory interpretation theory，Promote returning to the text itself instead of over -explanation。In recent years，Professor Zhang Jiang further developed this theory，Proposed public interpretation theory，It believes that "explanation is mutual understanding and communication in public spaces，instead of individual understanding and self -speaking instead of private space "。Explanation as a public activity，Also consciously，Explanation is not just making words or preaching a certain ideology，Instead, "Targeting the truth as the target，Event value of explanation "。This kind of view that will be explained as a public episodes，Conquest with the social knowledge theory that has started in recent years。

Social Epistemology is also a domain that is in response to postmodern trends。An important feature of the postmodern trend of modern ideas is to break the grand narrative，A manifestation of a grand narrative is the pursuit of truth，Therefore, the pursuit of truth must be deconstructed，Thinking that the pursuit of truth is actually a pure social process。Steve Fuller, who supports this tide, believes that we should indeed innovate the traditional epistemology of traditional epistemology，Social process of inspecting knowledge。but but，Do not use traditional philosophical speculation to analyze this process，Instead, the production system of designing and evaluating knowledge。He has created a sociology social epistemology。A philosopher represented bet365 Play online games by Ervin Goldman believes，Traditional epistemology (knowledge theory) does ignore the social dimension of knowledge，But this does not mean that knowledge should give up the pursuit of truth，It does not mean that traditional philosophical analysis cannot help understand the social dimension of knowledge。For this，He advocates the social epistemology of analyzing philosophy。Because the social epistemology of philosophy has followed the problems and methods of traditional knowledge theory，Therefore, we can call it social knowledge theory。

You can see，Social knowledge theory is very consistent with the theory of spirit and goals，All oppose postmodern trends，I believe that the theory of epistemology should be true，and emphasize the social process of epistemology。In "Public Interpretation Theory"，Professor Zhang Jiang focused on discussing the basic features of interpretation space，Think of the practical goal of seeking public interpretation，The social public space it occurs should have freedom、Equality、tolerance、Features of public constraints and pursuit of consensus。This outlines the general characteristics and principles of how to achieve the goal of seeking truth。Social knowledge theory In order to realize the goal of seeking true，It also attaches importance to the principle that the subject should follow in the social activities you know。but but，Professor Zhang Jiang from general、Different from the macro level，Social knowledge theory explores the specific behavioral specifications of social epistemology from the micro level。I think，This can further supplement public interpretation theory，Then provides specific practical specifications bet365 live casino games for the public interpretation of truth。Below，I will introduce how to do it as an interpretation based on the discussion of the principles of argument in the discussion of the principles of argument in Goldman's "Knowledge in the Social World"，can the proliferation of knowledge most effectively，This is to make more people get more knowledge。

Before introducing the principle of argument，Let's clarify what is argument。First，Debate is not a debate。Controversy is just repeating your own opinion，It will not give a reasonable reason to explain why your view is worthy of the other party。Next，Debate is not a debate。debate is a structured、Taking demonstration as a means，Pursuit of social activities that are better than different parties。A debate usually has a clear topic，There are different perspective supporters for this topic，There is a coordinated host，Supporters of different views (usually the opposite parties) strictly perform dialogue in accordance with certain procedures and rules，Defense for your own point of view in the program and rules，and refute different opinions。The goal of the debate is to win the opponent，instead of seeking truth。The argument is seeking truth。From this，Goldman thinks，If the speaker is arguing with the listener，So，The speaker believes the conclusion; the speaker believes that every premise of what is said; The audience expects that the listener can obtain a specific knowledge through his argument。You can see，Debate can promote the goal of seeking truth，This is to make more people get more knowledge。Due to no reason，Can't allow the listener to obtain the confirmation of confirmation; debate is not for the purpose of seeking truth，Pay attention to losing bet365 best casino games win，Do not ask the authenticity。The argument is divided into monologue and dialogue debate。​​Donald theory refers to the activity that argued one point of view from one party in one way; dialogue argument is the activity of two or more subject interdependences and arguments。Below，We will discuss the principles that these two arguments should follow in order to achieve knowledge proliferation。

When one person argued to another person，First，The point of arguing to the other party should be that the other party does not know。If the other party already knows this view，Debate will not allow the other party to get any new information，Therefore, knowledge proliferation will not be achieved。Of course，The less the audience knows，The more knowledge is proliferated。Next，All premises in the argument should be credible for some of the audience。If the listener does not believe in these prerequisites，Naturally, you will not think that these prerequisites support the viewer's opinion。other，The speaker is not only explained what these premises are，and explain the premise between the prerequisites as clear as possible、Logical relationship between the premise and conclusion，in order to enable listeners to understand how these premise is how to support the conclusion，Then confirm this point of view。but but，Different from strict philosophical argument，Debate should adopt a way to be friendly to the listener，Let the listener be the most efficient way to confirm this conclusion。If the listener must confirm the belief of the speaker's argument，The listener needs to be weakened or vetoed by the argument that the speaker supports the argument，Otherwise，The listener will not bet365 Play online games confirm the conclusion of the speaker's argument，Therefore, you will not get knowledge。

The preset knowledge of monologue is the one -way flow from speakers to listeners。But，In the process of real society cognition，Debate is often a two -way activity between listeners and speakers。In the dialogue debate，The listener is not just a passive knowledge recipient，It has independent thinking ability，Undertake the subject of understanding the responsibility of promoting the truth of society。To maximize the proliferation of knowledge，Dialogue on the interaction between listeners and speakers also needs to follow some specific practical principles。For example，When the listener has the belief that will weaken or veto the argument that speakers argues,，The listener should not just refuse to accept the speaker's point of view，It should also bear more social "responsibility"，Inform the speaker's weakening or rejection of rejuvenation，Let speakers change their original beliefs，so that the society can do better in seeking truth。At this time，We will say，The listener responded to the speaker's argument in a critical way。

Generally speaking，The listener has three ways to challenge speakers: one，Show a veto factor in the premise of the original theory;，denies the premise in the original argument;，Decisure the logical strength or logic relationship between the relationship between the premise and conclusion in the original argument。As long as a principle that needs to be followed in a critical follow -up argument，It is meaningful in seeking truth。That is to say，Only the listener confirmed that the speaker's original argument has problems in the above three situations，His challenge is meaningful for seeking bet365 Play online games truth。Of course，The premise of challenging speakers critically is to accurately understand the speaker's argument。That is to say，The listener can correctly reconstruct the speaker's argument。The challenge to speakers should be directly related to speakers' arguments。If the listener does not accurately understand the speaker's argument，The premise that the speaker did not mention，or transfer the speaker’s conclusion to other views，Or error refute the logical relationship between the premise and conclusion，Obviously not conducive to seeking truth。

Dialogue and debate considers social cognitive activities in actual situations，Therefore, the refute of the listener challenge the speaker，Speaker responds to the listener's refutation，Since the time is limited，So you should follow the principle of efficiency。That is to say，The listener does not need to challenge all the problems in the speaker's argument，Just choose the main problems for challenge。Turn in turn，The speaker does not need to respond to all the challenges of the listener，Just choose the most important challenge to respond。When the speaker decides to accept the challenge of the listener，According to the principle of growth of knowledge，Speakers must not only change their original beliefs，You need to publicly recover your original argument in time，Otherwise, it will make other listeners unable to track the trajectory of arguments，This is not conducive to the proliferation of knowledge。

The above is very briefly introduced by the proliferation of knowledge in the process of social cognition，Principles that should be followed。You can see，The principles of knowledge proliferation in social knowledge theory bet365 Play online games are consistent with the pursuit of public interpretation theory，and give a micro、Demonstration of specific levels of argumenting practice rules，It can help the public explain the specific implementation of the public space in the social space，Then promote the truth of society。

　　bet365 best casino games