Summary:Chinese nj bet365 justice and Rawlsian Western nj bet365 justice are two different discourse logics of nj bet365 value。Marx’s Critique of Justice and Value Research Methodology，Insist on facts and values、Substance and form、The overall methodology of historical analysis and practical confirmation，Rawls is constructivist reflective equilibrium method。Marxian nj bet365 value methodology is better than Rawlsian nj bet365 value method。Analysis of the Purpose of the Fair Value Category Based on Marxist Methodology、Normative、Concreteness，Justice is a value virtue superior to justice；From the perspective of China’s nj bet365 justice (fairness and justice) and the rank of Rawls’ “fair justice” value、Strength and Weakness、The difference between constraint and constraint，And nj bet365 facts，nj bet365 system value basic structure efficiency，Especially from the practical confirmation of "Marx's efficiency is optimal" or "Deng Xiaoping's optimal"，Justice is an nj bet365 value that is superior to justice。Justice is the value discourse logic of China’s social governance system，It should also be suitable for the value discourse logic of global governance system。See and stop from here，Adhere to the consciousness of Marxist methodology，Not only is it a prerequisite to clarify which one takes precedence between nj bet365 justice and Rawlsian Western nj bet365 justice，It is also the fundamental path to realize the innovative development of philosophy and social sciences。

　Keywords:Marxism Rawls Methodology nj bet365 value Discourse logic

Author Tan Peiwen，Professor of School of Marxism, Guangxi Normal University (Guilin 541004）；Tang Zhihua，Professor of School of Marxism, Guangxi Normal University (Guilin 541004）。