Richard Robiti is in the introduction of "Experience and Mind Philosophy" for Celas，Describes the thinkers of Pittsburgh as the explorer who completes some kind of philosophical planning，The overall roadmap of this philosophical planning is: (Celas) will analyze philosophy to lead its Hume stage，Introducing its Kant Period → (Brandon) will analyze the philosophy of the philosophy to lead its Kant stage，Introduction to its Hegel stage。The description of Ryti essentially reflects the traditional philosophy of contemporary philosophy in the tradition of "analysis -continental division"，Try to open up a new thinking path。Celas is a pre -clue of Fuxing Hegel's thoughts by clearly revealing the core issues of modern philosophy (the myth given to the myth "(he will" give "what he gives" and Hegel -style "direct nature" equivalence，And thinks that Hegel is the enemy of direct nature and leads to the same passersby); Brandon enters Hegel philosophy when solving the problem of normative sources，and find the basis for his standardized and consolidated school in Hegel's mutual recognition concept，According to this, the English world has activated the new research and explanation of Hegel。McDower, who is also a member of the Pittsburgh School, is explained by the interpretation of Kanto by the interpretation of the Hegel's concept.，and try to put Hegelra on the stage of analyzing philosophy。

Actually，The integration of "Mainland China -Analysis" This typical vane of the road direction is the picture scene between contemporary British and bet365 live casino games beautiful philosophy to the metaphysical interpretation of Hegel and the non -metaphysical interpretation of the school。For example，Robert Pippin Criticizing the discourse scoring practice of Brandon (Discursive Score-Keeping) is the double betrayal against Hegel (the first betrayal is Branton's individualist restoration from Hegel's thoughts，The second betrayal is Brandon's methodological abstraction and idealism directly filter out Hegel's historical transformation of Kant)，Dan Ping's own talk about discourse practice also deviates from Hegel，It is mainly reflected in the versatility of the concept of the social nature of rational actors。The key issues are not the contemporary research of Higgel, such as Brandon, or even Terry Pinkard (Terry Pinkard).，Instead, this kind of research status and research path reflects a new way out of contemporary British and American analysis tradition and mainland traditions，and a large part of this way out of this way out is provided by Hegel。Although Macorwell once said straightforward，"For the philosopher who analyzes the camp，It is unusual to get nourishment for its own thoughts from Hegel's concept. "，But the current status of the research in the philosophy of contemporary analysis undoubtedly shows the re -interpretation and activation of Hegel's thoughts。

Pau Redding (Pau Redding) reviewed the entanglement of analytical philosophy and Hegel philosophy in its book "Analysis Philosophy and Back to Hegel Thought" (2007)。Reading thinks，Russell is intended to make a calm division between analyzing philosophy and Kant -style derivative philosophy，That is just a "analysis of philosophy Bet365 lotto review creation myth"。In essence，Many philosophical genres of idealism with Kant and Hegel are integrated into the development process of analysis philosophy。Analysis of philosophers in the tradition of philosophy also promoted the solution of the traditional problems of philosophy in Kant and Hegel's thought nourishment。For example，Macorwell and Brandon not only acknowledge the correlation between its thoughts and Hegel philosophy，and all believe that Hegel provides solutions for the core theory of philosophy that plagues the philosophy of the second half of the 20th century。

Maybe for analysis of philosophy，Kant philosophy shaped the world with the initiative with the initiative、With a more sober empiricalism, becoming a deeper friend of empiricalism，So it is also a friend of the philosophical thinker who is more intimate than Hegel。But the difference between Kant or Kurgel，As analyzed by Reading: "Back to the 20th Century，Science has already undergone enough historic changes，This makes us prefer to agree with Hegel instead of Kant。The plasticity of this knowledge is connected with the fact that the path of Kant and Hegel is separated from Hegel，Once again, Hegel is ranked as one side of modern thinkers。"" But，Kant is always unable to bypass it，The path of contemporary analytical philosophers to Hegel is also achieved on the basis of Kant。Just their discussion on Hegel，It is not in the sense of "Hegel's completion of Kant", which is not judged by Piping。Brandon、The key points of the contemporary analysis camp thinkers such as Macorwell and Celas can prove this。

From the opinion of Brandon，Kant's norms are his revolutionary contribution in the history Bet365 lotto review of thought，But it really clarifies the source of norms, but Hegel。Lack of historical sense becomes Kant's "flaw"，and Hegel explained the problem of standardized sources for its social historicity。In "The Old News"，Brandon describes the insight provided by Hegel as "for Hegel，All prior settings are the prescribed things of the society "。This view becomes the key discussion of the Hegel phase of the analysis philosophy referred to the philosophy of Ryti。Brandon further advocates，Hegel places the standardized foundation in social recognition practice，All conceptual commitments as social achievements are based on mutual recognition，Established a specific connection between language and spiritual concepts by recognizing the concept。Concept、Specifications and mutual recognition are closely linked，This has formed the theory of regulatory and conscience of Brandon，Establish a systemic description of standardized sources。

Branton's criticism caused by the concept of "recognition" in the analysis context is multi -faceted。Many researchers from Hegel think，Brandon mistakenly interpreted the relationship between Hegel's view of society and rationality，Because of its emphasis on the priority of sociality, it violates the primary characteristics of Hegel's philosophy emphasized rationality to society。In the perspective of critics，This rational positive harm of Brandon is dual: one，If rationality is specified through social recognition process，All individuals involved in the dialogue process of recognition qualifications are the subjects of "Pseudo-Autonomy"，So how can this kind of discourse practice that has no real autonomy bet365 live casino games from the beginning can determine the norms and its effectiveness? Two，This interpretation has arrived with Hegel text，It means ignoring the classic text and even tampered with。In essence，This kind of criticism reflects the competitive relationship between Hegel and non -metaphysical interpretation of Hegel in the contemporary Hegel research circle。Researchers who have criticized the above criticism of Branton think，If Brandon understands the relationship between Hegel's recognition concept and true unlimited concept, and this relationship is important in "Phenomenology"，He will not misunderstand Hegel's true philosophical intention and make this non -metaphysical interpretation of it，Because the true infinite concept can explain the spontaneousness of the thought and explain the true autonomy，3095_3112，and finally explain the ambitions carried by the entire Hegel system。Agree with Branton's point of view and believe that his work is vital scholars for promoting analytical philosophy and Hegel research，The above -mentioned criticism can only be regarded as an uncomfortable understanding of the ambitions of Brandon's philosophy or just entangled from the end of the thin branches without seeing the full picture of its philosophy。

Macorwell, although a member of the Pittsburgh school with Branton，and also benefit from the work of Celas，But his way to be close to Hegel is obviously different from Brandon。Mike Tonwell thinks，Hegel's deportation method and results of Kant's priority framework make it a resource that can be used in contemporary analytical philosophy when discussing knowledge issues，The discussion of the relationship between bet365 live casino games the spontaneous unity and intuitive unity of Kant is the beginning of the work of Hegel's theory。According to this，Mike Tonwell agreed to the evaluation of the relationship between Kant and Hegel，It is believed that Hegel's conceptualism is "thoroughly to Kant"。Mike Tonwell thinks，The condition of the "conditions of the possibility of general experience is the condition of the possibility of the experience object" in Kant.，and he is subjective and objective、The balance between thought and real，We seem to have seen some of the shadows of Hegelism in the early days。But Macorwell has obtained it after further analysis，Kant, an early Early Hegelist promise to gain a balance between subjective and objective, is virtual，The incomparable nature of non -time -space free things makes the balance cannot be achieved。In order to rebuild the objectivity and get out of the priority framework，We need to stop regarding things that are time -oriented and spatial as directly，We need to understand things that are intellectual as intellectual in Kant as an element in the self -development of rational and freedom，Power on the development of Hegel。

In short，Regardless of the degree of question and criticism of the proposition of the proposition of "analyzing the trend of philosophy '"，It will ultimately make the adverse reputation that has been pressed on Hegel from Anglo -Saxon philosophy for the end.。Push the analysis of philosophy to Hegel stage，The attemptors who made this effort found that the real lasting vitality of Hegel's philosophy was found through its analysis.，Try to use the resources of mainland philosophy to obtain a new solution mechanism and path for analyzing bet365 best casino games the development of philosophy。

　　Bet365 lotto review

(Author Unit: Department of Philosophy of Guangxi University)