Open Fang Jun's new book "San Ye of Thought -Special Research on History Materialism" (Social Science Literature Press 2022)，Read the papers I have known，The time that gradually forgotten becomes fresh again; and the shiny new works，The resonance of the current academic thought is rare。Actually，A logo of the spirit of a nation，It is the start of the serious and serious academic text。It should be said，Our generation is lucky，Because I have encountered the best time for the development of modern Chinese society。So，We have no reason to contribute to the essence of all our thoughts as much as possible。For myself，From more than 20 years ago, "Back to Marx -Philosophy of Economics Context"，To the upcoming "Back to Marx -Critical Critical Criticism in Social Field Theory"，All such dedicated academic efforts。One breath is still，If you must fight。

"San Ye of Thought -Special Research on History Materialism" Fang Jun's 2000 published in "Perhaps" published in "Philosophy Research"，It is not important to raise a banner "，It is my "Back to Marx -Philosophy of Economic Context" more than 20 years ago.。Strictly speaking，This is not a book review，but a thought from high -end academic editors from first -class academic journals。Whether it is to me，Still the discussion of other scholars，Fang Jun did not simply give recognition without reflection，Questions and thinking in critical distance，bet365 best casino games It guarantees the authenticity of the historical logo of the history of thought。Fang Jun's questioning more than 20 years ago was: Back to Marx and lift a theoretical banner，You can "what trees are planted under this banner，What fruit "is more important，A seemingly original academic creation，How to follow "Follow Social Life、Time topic with the sufferings of the public "? (P. 335) This kind of doubtful questioning，Of course I deeply stab me。For many years，This critical reflection has always been like my research as a shadow。From the perspective of Fang Jun，"Philosophy is not knowledge"，Critical reflection on real life。Actually，This is the understanding of Marx's understanding of philosophy。It is precisely in this sense，"Marxism is the science of practice，The theory of the people "，"With some kind of selfish desire、Private、Private name、Private interest cannot enter the depths of Marx's heart "(preface page 4)。For this，I feel the same。But，Another question I think at the same time is: theoretical connection is actually the real character of Marxism，But what kind of theoretical approach to reality may be a more precedent question。Because，Using Western bourgeoisie's ideas to impersonate Marx，Or a pseudo -Marxism of the concept system of dogma，and simply "contact the actual"，Its negative effects may be greater。This is why I repeatedly emphasize the reason why Marx's original historical ideological situation is，Only in this way can it be possible to make the scientific world view bet365 live casino games and methodology of historical materialism and "pay attention to social life、Combination of Times Projects with the Popularity of the Mass "。Abstract "theoretical connection actual"，Always assume that I already have the absolute truth of Marxism in my hands，Then use it to arrange real life。For this simple and rude approach，In the past history, we left a painful lesson for us。

but but，Fang Jun's new question is: "You want to" return to Marx "，To give us a "original context" of Marx thought，So，"How can the‘ Marx ’interpreted by‘ I ’? (Page 334) Objectively say，I really can't guarantee。I'm afraid no one can guarantee。This is the secret of Marx's "About Ferbaha Outline"。Because，All later scholars' interpretation of Marx's historical text，All are just real life of a specific era，Understand a subjective reconstruction of a historical situation that people do not survive at all，The essence of all theoretical interpretations in the specific era，It must be the "My relationship with my environment" in practical activities under certain historical conditions。More than forty years ago，My teacher Hu Fuming reiterated that "practice is the standard for testing all truths"，It is also revealed that Marx's own "non -God View" epistemology。Remember when I was writing "Back to Lenin" in 2007，In the context of the theory of concept，I started to gradually replace the "I think" "I think" in the book "Back to Marx".，Some of my friends have questioned: If you are not sure about the understanding of Lenin in your book is "truth"，So what do Bet365 app download you write about it? Actually，Self -claiming things in your hand，I always contain error possibilities with my opinion that I realize my views，It is already two completely different conceptual concepts。

Of course，The historical situation encountered in the academic research process of each of us is very complicated。On the one hand，For a scholar，Published original academic papers or publishing academic theories，The utilitarian factors that exclude reality，The purpose is to enable readers to get new knowledge。Talk to the bigger，It is also a generation of response to the history of thought。But，Objective laws according to information dissemination and acceptance，If the amount of new information contained in an academic text exceeds a certain limit，The spread and acceptance of new information will be greatly reduced。I'm afraid，This is also the reason for Hydegel, which is far more than the consensus of the academic field consensus, which is far more than the consensus of the consensus consensus.。When I wrote a book "Back to Marx -Philosophy of Economics Context" more than 20 years ago，I am also afraid to use the new concept too much or make a large number of new ideas，It will lead to the reader's obstacles，Therefore, many new terms and perspectives that seem to be prone to misunderstandings are deleted at the last submission。Even so，This book was still unexpectedly impacted and misunderstood after being published at the time。Until the publishing of the book "Back to Lenin" in 2008，I officially proposed the idea of ​​"concept bet365 Play online games theory"。After that，Naturally, it is expected to be a serious obstacle。can be predicted，The second volume of "Back to Marx" I have completed at present，Because no longer suppress the originality of academic ideological categories and viewpoints，Its publication will definitely encounter the new cognitive break in the "law" prophecy of the communication science。

On the other hand，For a scholars' good articles and discussions，The luckiest thing is the scholar -type editor who meets the real "knowing goods"。Remember that I published the paper "Analysis of Marx's Special Regulations on Social History Development Natural Development" in 1991 in 1991，I am still a young teacher who works at a city -level party school，At that time, Mr. Wang Yuheng of the editorial department at the time for the sake of this article，It took a lot of hard work，Discussion over and over again，Modification again and again，He doesn't know me with me，It is just a new academic point of view。Good magazine，It is the land that cultivates scholars and leads thoughts; a good editor，It is a picker itself，What kind of article he knows will promote academic growth。I know Fang Jun，When he works in "Philosophy Research"。After publishing "Back to Marx"，Readers who have grasped the young Marx "people learning phenomenology" to "historical phenomenology" logic transition from the book like him like him。In his opinion，"Back to Marx" proposed that "'social materialism' constitutes an important theoretical source of historical materialism，While criticizing classical bet365 best casino games economics，Critical research on the dynamic history of capitalist economic life，is the further deepening of historical materialism、The fundamental prerequisite for rich and development "(pp. 332-333)。I think，If there is no in -depth understanding of Marx's classic literature，Is it impossible to make such a deep comment。Open Fang Jun's "Critical and Power of Social Symbolism"，You will be very surprised to see the author's deep academic skills，and his depth of philosophical thinking in the context of Marx's economics: "A kind of upside down and negative power and relationship" appeared in the exchange relationship，From the perspective of symbolics，not only reflects the separation of natural existence (use value) from the existence of pure economy (value)，It is more reflected in the separation and upside down that can be referred to with it，Products as a symbol，It is a kind of alienation for the dominant person (pp. 230-231)。This is the most cutting -edge of the basic theoretical research of Marxism、The deepest thinking sector。From this，You will know and believe in the academic vision of Fang Jun。

Actually，In my own academic development process，I have encountered a lot of such excellent magazine and publisher editor teachers，It is the hard work of the handling of the "others wedding dresses" that they stay away from the spotlight，Scholars' growth，Academic maturity。Chinese academics can have today，We should thank them silently。For the other army，Academic research comes from his busy editing and booking work.。But，The scattered Bet365 app download leaves of this thought reveal the extremely valuable light of our time。Hope，This light can illuminate the road to the front。

bet365 Play online games