For domestic scholars，"bet365 best casino games" was studied more as an economics work from the beginning。Under this economic research model，People default that "bet365 best casino games" is a subject with empirical significance、The science of mathematical quantification，Rather than an abstract philosophy。In the past ten years，Some scholars gradually interpret "bet365 best casino games" from a philosophical perspective，This has caused concern among scholars，Considers that “academic circles have gradually shown a theoretical tendency to interpret “bet365 best casino games” as a philosophical work。This tendency crosses the boundary of "bet365 best casino games" is a masterpiece of political economy，Leading to the weakening of the scientific nature of "bet365 best casino games"。To this，The author thinks，First, the scientific nature of "bet365 best casino games" will not be weakened by readers' interpretation，The key to the question is whether we really understand or master this science；The second is that the philosophical interpretation of "bet365 best casino games" does not mean that it is not a scientific interpretation，In other words, science cannot be equated with economics in a narrow way。

Disagreements among scholars surrounding the scientific nature of Capital，roughly reflected in the following three aspects。First, science and value、Differences in Interpretation of Moral Judgments。Under the comparison of these two seemingly opposing sets of concepts or categories，bet365 best casino games can either be regarded as morally irrelevant，It is a pure science，Like Hilferding’s point of view；Either interpreted as a non-scientific argument，But a value、Moral judgment，Like Bernstein’s point of view。Understanding science as and value、Opposite moral judgment，In fact, science is equated with "natural science"。The second is the difference in interpretation between science and ideology。Scholars who view the nature of "bet365 best casino games" from an ideological perspective，Either you think "bet365 best casino games" is an ideological work，Not scientific，Like Bernstein’s point of view；Either you think "bet365 best casino games" is not an ideological work，But scientifically，As Althusser’s point of view。The third is the difference in interpretation between science and philosophy。In the debate on the scientific nature of Capital，Potentially there is another point of view，That is, acknowledging the philosophical nature of Capital seems to mean denying or weakening its scientific nature。This view actually opposes philosophy to science from a disciplinary perspective，Philosophy is included in the humanities that cannot be verified experimentally or mathematically，Science is seen as providing certainty、Natural disciplines with objective conclusions。

When discussing the scientific nature of "bet365 best casino games" from the above three perspectives，We are always in the theoretical context of the reader，That is, there is no real entry into the theoretical context of Marx and his thoughts on Capital，And then there are differences on scientific issues，It is also impossible to truly grasp the scientific nature of "bet365 best casino games"。Therefore，The preferable method should be to return to the theoretical context of Marx and his thoughts on Capital。

一，The method used in "bet365 best casino games" is different from the method of natural science，And overcome the limitations of natural science methods，Realized scientific innovation in methods for research in the field of human social history。"bet365 best casino games" is based on absorbing Hegelian dialectics，Full use of the "from abstract to concrete" method，By grasping the abstract concept of "commodity"，Shows the currency contained within it、Capital、Residual value、Rich and specific content such as land rent and wages，Profoundly reveals the inner structure and laws of capitalist social production。By this method，Marx’s “bet365 best casino games” overcomes mathematics in natural sciences、Experiment、The limitations of empirical methods in studying human society，Realized the unification of precise research and reasonable expression，Beyond previous philosophy and political economy。

　Second，Objects grasped and studied in "bet365 best casino games"、The content is not ideological subjective conjecture，But it has real and effective objective reality。Although Marx emphasized，“My point of view is to understand the development of economic and social forms as a process of natural history”，But the fundamental point of Marx is not to equate human history with natural history，Rather, we believe that human history has objective regularities。Therefore，Different from natural science，What "bet365 best casino games" wants to grasp is not a world composed of pure materiality，But a human world。

Third，The conclusions drawn in "bet365 best casino games" are realistically foreseeable and historically forward-looking。"bet365 best casino games" reveals the inner structure of the capitalist mode of production and the formation of contradictions、Development mechanism，Demonstrates the historical trend of the gradual demise of capitalist society。The conclusion is not only true in a cognitive sense，Also has human purpose，Achieved a grasp of the laws of development of human society。Even today in the 21st century，Various theories explained in "bet365 best casino games"、Thoughts are still valid。

　　(Excerpted bet365 best casino games "Theory and Review" Issue 1, 2021)

(Author’s unit: School of Marxism, Fujian Normal University)