"Capital" scientific debate and truth
June 08, 2021 09:41 Source: "China Social Sciences" June 8, 2021, No. 2182, Issue 2182, 2021

For domestic scholars,"Capital Theory" from the beginning is more studied as economics works。In this economics research mode,People default "Capital" is an empirical significance、Mathematical quantitative science,instead of abstract philosophy。In the past ten years,Some scholars gradually interpret "Capital theory" from the perspective of philosophy,This has caused concerns about scholars,It is believed that "the academic community gradually shows a theoretical tendency to interpret the" Capital theory "as a philosophical work。This tendency has passed the boundary of "Capital" is the boundary of the giant of political economics,It has weakened the scientificity of "Capital" "。,I think,First, the scientific nature of "Capital" will not be weakened because of the reader's interpretation,bet365 best casino games The key to the question is whether we truly understand or master this scientificity; the second is the philosophical interpretation of "Capital" does not mean that it is not a scientific interpretation,That is to say, science can not be narrowly equated with economics。

Differences formed by scholars around the scientific issues of "Capital",roughly reflected in the following three aspects。First, science and value、Different interpretation of moral judgment。Comparison of the two groups of concepts or categories that seem opposite,"Capital Theory" is either regarded as nothing to do with morality,Is a pure science,Ruhifa Pavilion's point of view;,but a value、Moral judgment,Ru Bernostan's point of view。Understand science as with value、Moral judgment relative,In fact, science is equivalent to "Natural Science"。Second, the difference between scientific and ideological interpretation。Scholars who look at the nature of "Capital" from an ideological perspective,Bet365 app download Either I think "Capital" is an ideological work,Not scientific,such as Bernostan's point of view;,But scientific,Ruda's point of view。Third, the difference between the interpretation of science and philosophy。In the controversy of the scientific issue of "Capital",Potentially exist another point of view,The philosophical nature of recognizing "Capital" seems to mean that negation or weakening its scientificity。This view is actually relative to philosophy and science from the perspective of discipline,Philosophy is included in the humanities discipline that cannot be confirmed by experiments or mathematics,Science is considered to be able to provide sure、Natural disciplines of objective conclusions。

Discuss the scientific time of "Capital" from the above three perspectives,We are always in the theoretical context of the reader,That is, the theoretical context does not really enter Marx and its "capital theory" thinking,Then there is differences on Bet365 app download scientific issues,I can't really grasp the scientific nature of "Capital"。So,The desirable method should be the theoretical context of returning to Marx and its "capital theory" thought。

One,The method used in "Capital" is different from natural science methods,and overcome the limitations of natural science methods,Realized scientific innovation in methods in the field of human social history。"Capital" on the basis of absorbing Hegel's dialectics,Methods "from abstraction to specific" method,By grasping the abstract concept of "product",Show the currency contained in it、Capital、Remaining value、Rich and specific content such as land rent and salary,Deeply reveals the inherent structure and laws of capitalist society production。Through this method,Marx's "Capital" overcomes mathematics in natural sciences、Experiment、Empirical methods are limited in the study of human society,Unification of accurate research and bet365 live casino games reasonable expression,Beyond the previous philosophy and political economics。

Its two,Objects grasped and studied by "Capital"、The content is not the subjective imagination of ideology,Instead, it has real and effective objective reality。Although Marx emphasized,"My point of view is to understand the development of the social form of the economy as a process of natural history",But Marx's fundamental meaning is not to equate human history with the history of nature,Instead of thinking that human history has objective regularity。So,Different from natural science,"Capital Theory" is not to grasp the world composed of pure materiality,but the human world。

Its three,The conclusions obtained from "Capital" have realistic predictability and historical forward -looking。"Capital Theory" reveals the inherent structure and contradictions of the capitalist production method、Development mechanism,The historical trend of the capitalist society bet365 Play online games gradually moves towards the demise。The conclusion not only has the truth of the cognitive sense,Also with human purpose,The grasp of the laws of human society development。Even today in the 21st century,Various theories described in "Capital"、Thought is still effective。

  bet365 Play online games

(Author Unit: College of Marxism, Fujian Normal University)

Editor in charge: Zhang Yueying
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Bet365 app download Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxian 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026