Scientific Research Institute is a collective referred to for the research institute and research institute of scientific research，Scientific Research Institute in the documents of the state and ministries and commissions generally refers to the research institute and research institute of state institutions。The scientific research institute of our public institutions mainly undertakes the government、Each ministries and commissions、Army、Hospital and other subjects with important value project research。Due to the talents and professional advantages of these research institutes，The state attaches great importance to their scientific research activities，Funding investment and scientific research tasks gradually increase，This not only brings unprecedented development opportunities to the Scientific Institute，It also brings a lot of challenges to its performance evaluation。Achievements Evaluation Weight Light Quality、Light conversion and other issues such as heavy production gradually prominent。Performance of scientific research results performance evaluation system and system is an important task for the reform of the scientific research institute，The main responsibility of strengthening the performance evaluation of the Scientific Research Institute is active attempt。

　　Bet365 app download

Long -term effort，A series of documents on the evaluation system and system reform of scientific research results have been introduced.，The main responsibility in the performance evaluation of the Scientific Research Institute has a certain basis。such as，Determination of the evaluation standard、Selection of evaluation methods and methods、Evaluation system -oriented presets, etc.，Promoting the development of scientific research in the research institute。but，There are also some shortcomings in the scientific Bet365 lotto review research institute's performance evaluation system and system，The effect of "Wooden Barrel Effect" cannot be ignored，Enhancement of the main responsibility。

First, the standard consideration of scientific research results performance evaluation is not weekly。Design to transfer the scientific research results performance evaluation criteria and system that everyone is satisfied with everyone is unrealistic，I can only try it constantly，Improving evaluation standards and optimization evaluation index systems in exploration。Current，The scientific research performance evaluation standards of some public institutions have "one -size -fits -all" phenomenon，Type and characteristics of the Institute of Research、Relators of individual differences and particularity of scientific researchers are relatively small，Some evaluation standards ignore the evaluation of the social value and contribution of scientific research results。

Second, the method of performance evaluation of scientific research results compares a single。In terms of performance evaluation of scientific research results，Some scientific research institutes only use journal levels、SCI papers quantity、Project level and other evaluation scientific research results or talents，Pay attention to the assessment of quantification，Understand the quality and social evaluation of scientific research results。Long this time，It will inevitably reduce the overall scientific research value and social contribution of academic achievements，It may cause waste of scientific research results。Another，Evaluation methods for classification evaluation in different categories also need to be improved。

Third, the correlation between scientific research results performance evaluation and economic income is too strong。The scientific research achievements of the scientific research institute of public institutions must have the consciousness of serving the society，To establish the spirit of "worrying and worrying in the world in the world"。but，The performance evaluation of scientific research achievements of the current research institute is often promoted with personal title、Subsidies issuance and honor is closely related，Leading many scientific Bet365 app download researchers from various ideas，Easy to make close benefits due to personal interests。This is not only endangered scientific research innovation，It also caused scientific researchers to ignore team cooperation and collaborative research，To a certain extent hindered scientific research collaborative innovation，The output of more academic and practical value of scientific research on value and practical value。The output of the scientific research results of these employed units is often competitive.。Another，Some public institutions scientific research performance evaluation of scientific research performance still has power and responsibility、Low -efficiency and other issues or management bottlenecks that restrict scientific research and academic innovation。From the above, it can be seen，One aspect of a shortcomings of scientific research performance evaluation of scientific research institutes in public institutions is not tolerance is that the main responsibility of the scientific research institute is not strong。

　　Best due to the subject responsibility

The Institute of Scientific Research Institute of Institutions is the main force engaged in scientific research，Has made outstanding contributions to my country's innovation and development。The main responsibility issues caused by low scientific research performance evaluation of the scientific research performance of public institutions，There is a unique reason。

The composition of the evaluation subject is not scientific enough。Theoretically speaking，The subject of performance evaluation of the scientific research institute of public institutions is composed of academic community，But in reality，The evaluation subject of the scientific research institute of most public institutions constitutes a lot of members of the administrative department or management department。Most of them are not familiar with the academic connotation of subjects and scientific research results，can only be evaluated by quantitative indicators for results。Specific manifestation as the influence factor of the papers to determine the quality and value of the paper，instead of the quality and value of academic content。When the academic community breaks away from the performance evaluation subject，The authority of the evaluation of scientific research Bet365 lotto review results will inevitably be questioned。These indirect points of the main responsibility of the scientific research unit。

The design of the reward or incentive system is not fair enough。Performance evaluation and reward methods of scientific research institutes of public institutions should be objective and fair、Combined with actual，to help stimulate scientific research creation。But，At present, the performance evaluation of scientific research institutes of some public institutions adopts a general performance evaluation method to evaluate different categories、Different difficult scientific research content，And the content of the content with scholars' allowance、Promotion and other tight associations，Objective justice that leads to performance evaluation rewards is difficult to guarantee，It is difficult to play its incentive effect。And，The salary and performance rewards of scientific researchers of some institutions of public institutions are controlled by total amount，Can't enjoy salary incentives with market competitiveness，Lead of insufficient innovation vitality。These directly point to the main responsibility of the scientific research unit。

The institutional design of the supervision mechanism is insufficient。The supervision power of the performance evaluation of the scientific research institute of public institutions should be controlled by the national administrative department，But under the current supervision mechanism，The national administrative department only uses the guidance work at the macro level，It is difficult to play due role in specific performance evaluation supervision。Another，Scientific research performance evaluation is also susceptible to interference by external factors，The institutional design defects of the scientific research results performance evaluation supervision mechanism are hard to say。

　Return to scientific research book

The lack or problem of the performance evaluation of the scientific research institute of public institutions，How to improve its performance evaluation quality，Let the scientific Bet365 lotto review research institute's performance evaluation return to science and scientific research book，The key is to play and strengthen the main responsibility of the scientific research institute。

First，Institutionalization Clear performance Evaluation subject composition。Scientific research performance evaluation bet365 live casino games subjects should return to the academic community evaluation system，Specific from the Scientific Institute、University、The party and government departments are commonly composed of experts，If necessary, you need to hire a professional third -party evaluation agency，Carry out specific performance evaluation activities。Scientific Research Institute、Universities can jointly establish a performance evaluation research department，According to different disciplines、Different difficult academic achievements set a classification evaluation team，Cross -school when necessary、Cross -district joint formation，to ensure the academic and professional nature of the evaluation subject。During the evaluation process，Avoidance system for the evaluation of the research institute，Create a relatively complete defense system、Feedback System、Backtime evaluation system, etc.，to make the results of academic evaluation more standardized、Science。When hiring a third -party evaluation agency，Ensure the professionalism and independence of the personnel of the third -party evaluation agency，and formulate evaluation standards in advance、Details，Strictly implement the formulation of the performance evaluation scheme，Avoid bad interference from external factors。At the same time，Regular retrospective performance evaluation results，Accept the supervision of relevant departments。

Next，Institutionalized reward and punishment subjects and responsibility list。In terms of scientific research performance evaluation and reward subject composition，Establish a government department、University、Scientific Research Institute、Foundation、The results of the results of the results of the third -party evaluation agencies and other parties.，In accordance with the reward measures and reward rules，"Actively mobilize the enthusiasm of researchers in the research institute、Creativity "is the fundamental goal，Precision Reward。At the same time，Scientific research performance evaluation and reward subject is also responsible for formulating bet365 Play online games a reward plan、Implementation results reward distribution、Improve the reward system and mechanism。Of course，The evaluation and reward activities it carried out should accept public and social supervision。

Last，The work authority and responsibility of the subject supervised by the institutionalization research institute。In terms of performance evaluation and supervision of scientific research institutes，If you can set up a supervision team from the national level，Objectively、The best fairness and fairness，But there are difficulties in practical exercises。The Institute of Scientific Research still needs to play and strengthen its supervisor's main responsibility，such as，Establish an internal supervision team，Supervision and Evaluation and Reward Qualification Certification，Specific implementation of supervision evaluation and reward work。Scientific Research Institute as the main body of supervision to escort the evaluation and reward work，Make performance evaluation effectively。Of course，Supervision work should be institutionalized，Make each of the supervision permissions and responsibilities of each stage reasonable and reasonable，Make sure the credibility of scientific research performance evaluation results。

(This article is the major topic of the Ministry of Education and Social Sciences Research Project "Research on the Reform of my country's Science and Technology Evaluation System in the New Era" (19JZD025) phased results)

(Author Unit: School of Public Management, South China University of Technology)