Thinking about my country's scientific research evaluation system
June 08, 2021 09:43 Source: "China Social Sciences" June 8, 2021, No. 2182, Song Yanhui

With the continuous deepening of the reform of the scientific research management system,Scientific research evaluation system as an important part,Its reform work is also continuously promoting。Scientific Research Evaluation as an important process for judging the value of academic achievements,The scientific research evaluation system should tend to be scientific、Reasonable。In contrast,The exploration of some Western countries for scientific research evaluation is first in our country。For example,The evaluation system of American universities first introduced the "peer expert review",Based on this, the citation metering method、Social Evaluation Method,Usually a third -party special evaluation agency conducts objective and independent assessments; European universities' evaluation systems are mostly dominated by the country,Scientific research evaluation is mainly for research institutions,Including the overall scientific research evaluation, including colleges and universities,instead of bet365 best casino games scientific evaluation for scholars' personal research。my country's scientific research evaluation system is at the beginning of the establishment,It is a reference for European and American countries,At present, the evaluation system is gradually presenting、dimension、Method、The development trend of diversified process。

Since the founding of New China,my country's scientific research evaluation system has experienced the establishment of the system、Changes and broken processes。Government departments attach great importance to the establishment and development of the scientific research evaluation system,I promulgated a series of policy and regulations documents,The evolution of the system is roughly divided into four stages。

First,Stage of Starting and Development (1949-1976)。This stage is manifested as a political evaluation as the center,Leading administrative forces,The system of the system promoted by relevant departments to promote scientific research evaluation。For example, the "Interim Measures for Scientific Research Reward in Higher Education (Draft)" (1956)、"Interim Provisions on the Name of Teachers and Formation and Promotion Measures for Teachers in Higher Schools" (1960)、"Inspection Report on the Working Measures on bet365 live casino games Teachers' Work Elimination of Universities" (1964), etc.,Lien the teacher's title evaluation with the political principles of scientific research evaluation directly。

Second,Adjustment stage (1977-1989)。After the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Party,my country has entered a period of reform and opening up,Research on scientific research evaluation gradually embark on track。The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued the "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the reform of the education system" (1985)、"Interim Provisions on selecting Key Disciplines of Higher Universities" (1987), etc.,This stage is still manifested as the main assessment method with qualitative evaluation。

third,The change stage (1990-1001)。The country begins to implement the "Science and Education and Education" strategy,Actively explore the scientific research evaluation system with Chinese characteristics,I issued the "Interim Provisions on Education Evaluation Education Education" (1990)、"Outline of Education Reform and Development" (1993)、"Letter of Entrusting Beijing Institute of Technology to establish a" Letter and Graduate Education Evaluation Consultation Institution "(1994), etc.。This stage is manifested as an evaluation system bet365 live casino games that adopts qualitative and quantitative coexistence,But at this time the peer review mechanism is not mature。

fourth,Perfecting stage (2002 to the present)。The development of the scientific research evaluation system is faster and standardized,To integrate with international standards,my country has made a deeper reform of scientific research evaluation policies。For example,Ministry of Science and Technology、The Ministry of Finance, etc. have promulgated the "Interim Measures for the Management of Science and Technology Evaluation" (2000)、"Interim Measures for the Management of Bidding for Bidding for National Scientific Research Plan" (2002)、"Interim Measures for the Evaluation and Review of the National Scientific Research Plan" (2002)、"Several Opinions of the State Council of the Communist Party of China on Deepening the Reform of the Innovation and Mechanisms to Accelerate Implementation of Innovation -Driven Development Strategy" (2015)、"Regarding deepening project review、Talent evaluation、Opinions of the Institutional Evaluation Reform "(2018) A series of normative documents,Re -pull back to "Scientific Research" itself,Try to establish a set of classification evaluation index systems mainly based on diversified innovation。This stage has accompanied the rapid bet365 live casino games development of my country's scientific research since the 21st century,The longest time、The deepest change,Many new problems have also been produced。

From the long -term bet365 live casino games development of my country's scientific research work,The existing scientific research evaluation system is selected as the selection of evaluation indicators and evaluation methods,It is more and more difficult to meet the needs of the times and the expectations of the evaluation subject。Especially since the 21st century, excessive pursuit of quantitative indicators、Relying on external evaluation indicators and other issues have become increasingly becoming the focus of academic attention。For example,Ministry of Education、The Ministry of Science and Technology has issued the "Several Opinions on the use of the correct evaluation orientation of the relevant indicators of SCI papers in higher schools",Deliven to eliminate academic unhealthy winds such as "theory of only theory" and "SCI first"。The formulation and implementation of the "Opinions" promoted the development of academic innovation towards high -quality development,Construction of fairness、Scientific、A standardized scientific research evaluation system conducted a macro guide,It is conducive to creating a good academic ecological Bet365 app download environment。Current,my country has not fully established scientific authority、Open and transparent scientific research evaluation system。In view of the complexity of scientific research evaluation,The importance of policy promotion reform,From evaluation policy、Evaluation subject、Evaluation index system and other dimensions study my country's scientific research evaluation system、Policy,Discuss its status and role in establishing a scientific research evaluation system,The development of Chinese scientific research evaluation will be very beneficial。

  bet365 best casino games

Editor in charge: Zhang Yueying
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official Website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026